Why is technology taking so long to develop realistic robot sex dolls for us?

Why is technology taking so long to develop realistic robot sex dolls for us?

Attached: B8C1DD67-5B57-4839-91C6-5E8E25C00F1D.jpg (590x673, 93.83K)

Jews are against it

>for us

speak for youself degenerate genetic deadend

Why did she get so fat and ugly. My Taylor Swiftbot will be from the prime 2005 era.

Why are you taking so long to get a girlfriend son?

because they're trying to make realistic faces and emotional responses that places them squarely in the uncanny valley, when patrician robofuckers want a gynoid. just create a slightly distorted synthetic feminine voice and give her a chasiss like this

Attached: b12bfa346c1c3b6f4e4d0e89e90e4525_large[1].jpg (1236x2000, 946.32K)

It happened when she started taking positions on politics. Everything has a price.

>relying on venture capital for sexual gratification
>relying on OTHER MEN for sexual gratification

You're not even a proper man, you're quasi homosexual

i would rather have human level AI that i can fuck around with and just bail out any time i want, fuck having some robot around when i only want to fuck it maybe 3-4 times a day, besides it will probably spy on you for the government and your coomer self won't give a shit

Attached: 1586119209082.jpg (780x409, 44.46K)

Taytay's always perfect and will never hit the wall thanks to the Adrenochrome™

You have to be fucking kidding me!
Why the fuck are you trying to talk people into this shit,
Cant you just fuck off and let them get a girl instead, you closet faggot.

Yeah she started getting hot. What a price to pay

The technology is there. The problem for the jew comes when they realized if we have this new technology we can mildly satisfy our needs without a woman or masturbating to porn, potentially leading us to freedom of mental instability and other minimal issues that these two bring behind, specially avoiding ideologically and emotionally damaged women, being the main benefit not engaging in the feminism and patriarchy paranoid schizo dynamics, while stopping the gender war agenda.

gee i wonder why you are upset, you walking yeast factory

Attached: 1586130294532.jpg (259x194, 6.43K)

They probably want to flood the market so when protesters start to gather half of the country is going to have one by then

t. chad

Because you dont need "robotic sex dolls" when you have a real life biosynthetic sex toy walking around at a rate of nearly 1:1 for ever real person.
All you have to do is not be a total piece of shit loser.

Yeah nah, fuck you bitch gonna have to earn money some other way that is not relying on your tits and cunt :)

Attached: 1585683822176.webm (853x480, 1.58M)

But I want a robot who looks like Tay Tay

Attached: 8F6A300F-4CB4-4DA5-9BE3-B88B2D37E68C.jpg (640x778, 193.41K)

You know that's bullshit, a woman is a ball and a chain. High quality ones are expensive and hard to exchange

Then get a trap, its not rocket science.
Im literally a guy
A woman is only a ball and chain if you dont know how a leash works. This world revolves around dominance. You either have a bitch or you are the bitch. If you dont have her trained, you are the woman.

>possible legal trouble
>annoying needs and past baggage
>pestering you all the time for bullshit reasons
>thinks using her cunt as a weapon is a winning strategy for the long term

vs

>will do anything you want and can tweak their personality to whatever you feel like that day

hmmm

>trained
>leash
All this work for some pussy, you are a slave of jewish construct called "a real man would". A man does what he wants and I want to have a sex doll

>>thinks using her cunt as a weapon is a winning strategy for the long term
>vs
>>will do anything you want and can tweak their personality to whatever you feel like that day

you literally just did
>being her bitch
vs
>her knowing her place

Women who are in submission will always tweak their personality to align with yours.

>A man does what he wants and I want to have a sex doll
Thats literally the only valid rebuttable to what I said and yet its not applicable to this conversation because the the faggot slide thread maker op asked "why hasnt science made sex dolls" and not "why shouldnt I have a sex doll".

>>Taylor Swift
>>She
user, I...

How it's not applicable men who wants sex dolls are happy men who don't want them are happy because more single women. Losers are still losers except less frustrated. I see only positives

Based leaf

because the topic at hand is "Why is technology taking so long to develop realistic robot sex dolls for us?" ()
not "why shouldn't I get a sex doll".
Your answer is for a hypothetical opposition to why you should not have one, to which you replied "because real men do what they want".
Nobody said you shouldn't have one.
I answered op, that science isnt making them because they already exist.
You respond with "men do what they want". we are talking about why something doesn't exist, not whether or not men should partake ins somethings use when it does exist.

Because women do not want to lose power to something men could just buy off the shelf.
Think of the shame a man has when purchasing or using a sleeve.
Compare that with the shame (or lack thereof) a woman has to endure when purchasing or using a vibrator or dildo.

You want to look like a chad and all I see is a retard. My 1st post was 100% on point if anything was not applicable it was your post and my replies are applicable to your post