>Ok Yas Forums Prove the Holocaust didnt happend with ARGUMENTS
Well they say there was a plot to murder all the Jews. And they had all the Jews rounded up in camps for like 3 years after the supposed start date of this holocaust in 1942. And 3 years later there were still millions of Jews alive in the camps. So it would seem pretty clear that there wasn't a "plan to murder all the Jews". Whatever other unfortunate things happened. Murders. Mass murders. Starvation. Disease. Ect. Whatever all of that that happened was, it wasn't some grand plan to "murder all the Jews". It just patently wasn't based on the fact that they kept those Jews alive and clothed then, fed them, sheltered them for 3 whole years at a financial net loss to the reich.
The Holocaust
In KL Litzmannstadt kapos were Jews. They were beaten for wearing a cross/being catholic by them.
There is no actual proof. You have the burden of the proof here.
>Holocaust? Never heard of it
>Alarming
Topfuckingkek!!But it's time to go back.
>Im tired of negationism, name calling and ad hominen arent real arguments, please elaborate
ok schlomo...you are so tired of these tactics.I totally believe you.
They weren't doing much to keep them alive either.
You are forgetting that before they started moving people out of ghettos (let's say 1942) they were quite busy genociding Poles.
Rather 2 than 3 years.
>Murders. Mass murders. Starvation. Disease. Ect.
Calling it "unfortunate" is moronic.
Why wouldn't it be part of some plan? A coincidence? This sounds unbelievably stupid.
Gee, i wonder why Auschwitz camp was so huge.... hmm... probably to host a lot of people? Nah, a coincidence.
You call starvation "keeping alive"?
"Clothed them?" Nobody got any clothes before being selected to live after arriving into a concentration camp, where he got stripes outfit (not exactly top hugo boss).
I also wouldn't call that food, what they were getting to eat, mr fancy pants.
Germans robbed Jews of everything. What "financial loss"? Are you a clown?
"hlocaust" can mean anything you want. On the other hand "genocide" is a precise term.
Stop this strawman: "murder all the Jews". Of course he didn't mean it because first he would need to conquer USA. Very dumb strawman.
Watch the movie "The Bunker" (1981). He wanted to "show the world the way" to free themselves from Jews. To give an example, how to do it. He wanted to inspire.
Your argument serves two purposes:
- to hide that Hitler multiplied Jewish domination over the world by making Germany finance hlocaust religion for decades to follow (as a result of his "genius")
- to hide that genocide on Poles, Russians, Belarusians and others were even bigger and deserves not less recognition
Here are some numbers, since it is all you care about: 600'000 Jews were living at some point in Warsaw Ghetto alone. How many of them survived? If most survived they would try to restore exactly the same settlements as they were having in Poland. So after 70 years, it would be easy to investigate, that half of some town's population continue to have their own town, despite moving few thousands kilometers away.
This is how people behave. Regardless, you would be able just to find those people, even scattered all over the world, you would find whole towns, whole streets. There was plenty of time...
Unfortunately, those who survived were the worst people, who murdered their own nation. Look up Judenrat, jewish kapo
If you want to know, how many survived, my best shot would be to read Department of state report on Poland from 1946. You should also try to evaluate how many escaped to Soviet Russia and joined the communist ranks.
The expression "hlocaust didn't happen" is not "wrong" or "right". It doesn't mean anything, because the word "hlocaust" can mean any Jew ever murdered since Adam and Eve left The Garden. The same story as with "antisemitism". It's just moving the goal posts.
>inocent jews
/thread
It happened but to a lot more people than just jews, and without nearly as many jews killed as they claim.