New Cuck Philosophy video:

New Cuck Philosophy video:

Marx was not a "statist"

youtube.com/watch?v=rRXvQuE9xO4

Attached: Screenshot01.png (219x204, 36.52K)

No one cares.

Silence roach

Ching chong ping pong

I am a pro-statist

you need a state to enforce a social contract which is where your rights come from
i don't think you can have rights without something like a state to enforce them
how the fuck does justice exist without a state?

Attached: [V LIVE] TWICE TV 2018 EP.05-62509-[06.52.412-06.56.649].webm (1920x1080, 2.51M)

true marxism is very close to libertarianism and anarchism so it's quite glaringly obvious that he was not a statist.

Marxism also relies heavily on temporary statist measures which is why it inevitably leads to a Soviet state rather than a Marxist one. Communism fails due to the human condition of lust for power.

>Marxism also relies heavily on temporary statist measures
In the video the guy shows it's how Marx thought only before the 1870 Paris Commune. After the Commune both he and Engels seemed opposed to even temporary statism

What a retard.
Hurrr derr we all magically share everything

Before the hurr durr we magically share everything there's still labor incentives, only they're in the form of labor vouchers instead of money. So you can't accumulate/loan/invest it, only earn it through work.

(((Marx))) never worked a single day in his life. He is a super neet talking about economy and workers in general

Our rights come from God, faggot. Now get back to hiding in your house from microbes. Pathetic.

Attached: 200w.gif (200x113, 99.29K)

i'd argue that the soviet union after lenin abandoned the marxian path and instead settled for the state capitalist route. The state in that form became aggressively bureaucratised favouring the social hierarchical structures that inevitably produce exploitation and corruption. It's within this societal framework that the apparent innate natural human condition of "lust for power" is an emergent property of those bureaucracies and is an emanation of those oppressive power structures through our consciousness. The "lust for power" is a psychological tyranny, a manifestation of the conditions in which we inhabit. Transform the conditions from such a paradigm and we will no longer have such a destructive appetite to rule over others. Humans merely reflect its surroundings and conform to the collective, subjectively applying a moral value to retain and perpetuate that status quo. The "lust for power" is learnt, mimicked imitated and synthesised out of our own weaknesses. It can change and it will change.

>Before the hurr durr we magically share everything there's still labor incentives, only they're in the form of labor vouchers instead of money
so it's slavery then

it's perfectly analogous to wageslavery

That's called money you retard.

you can use money to earn more money without working for it (somebody else does the work). That doesn't apple to labor vouchers.

So you mean like Yas Forums? Oh God, what if next Marx will be from here? And Hitler was also Neet! The world trembles at the feet of the neet!

what if the majority of people don't want to live under communism?

you do, you just don't know it yet

but you know better what i want?

do you condone rape?

the general will must always take precedent over the individual will for the achieving and preserving the common good.

i hope you lose everything

they’re called ”temporary” because the goys wouldn’t support marxism if they were told it was going to be a brutal revanchist jewish tyranny.

Marx talks almost nothing about the actual goals of his ideology, beyond fluffy dreamer bait like “a classless society” and other nonsense because no one would support creating the USSR if it was described to them.

And yes, making use of public unrest to institute their own tyranny was always the plan.

We all have equal rights and obligations to the community we live in. If someone doesn't respect another individual's liberties or fails to carry out their (reasonable) duties, they are denied certain advantages from the community.

>Marxism also relies heavily on temporary statist measures
Leninism does. I'm not going to claim it wasn't real socialism, but there are other kinds of socialism, and its weird that MLs are considered the only type when they were the minority of commies before 1918.
The dictatorship of the proletariat, as described by engels, was direct democracy.

that doesn’t matter because the plan is to use social unrest to institute a jewish tyranny to take revenge on the goyim and enrich the clan at their expense.

The USSR did exactly what it was supposed to do, and as a result even those who were expelled early on like trotsky were billionaires even in 1920s dollars.

Yes it caused a few goys to die of starvation, but they’re not human anyway according to the talmud so what does that matter?

what if the majority of people don't want to live under communism?
>you do, you just don't know it yet
but you know better what i want?
>the general will must always take precedent over the individual will for the achieving and preserving the common good.
but what if the majority of people don't want to live under communism?
>you do, you just don't know it yet
but you know better what i want?
>the general will must always take precedent over the individual will for the achieving and preserving the common good.

national socialism is “real” socialism.

Marxism was meant to do what it did in Romania, Russia, in Poland and many other places. Use goy social unrest to create a jewish tyranny that could enrich the tribe and let them take revenge for all their perceived slights and wrongs their deranged minds had decided that the. guys had done them.

it was allso never intended to be implemented, but just bait for dumb goys. Meant to create displeasure with the current social order so it could be replaced with a brutal jewish dictatorship.

And if that a not true why was it always a what happened where marxism was implemented?

What happens when they have more thugs and guns than the community?

Golly gee, Marx isn't the right-wing strawman that has been misrepresented and manipulates by centuries of propaganda... You'd all know that if you were actually curious minded people interested in ideas and using your brains. Unfortunately you're just shitposters and not interested in genuine learning. Learning means also reading ideas you think you disagree with.

>literal commie youtube channel being shilled on Yas Forums
end times indeed

civil society currently exhibits the will and desires of the ruling elite oligarchs whose values are in direct contradiction of the majority. the majority reciprocate these values because they have been convinced of their value through status. The status is derived from the dominant rule and authority of the ruling class. the monolithic dominant state reinforces its values as the "common good". The majority who have sacrificed their own personal will for an exploitative existence through capitalist servitude and subjugation is not the will of the common good but the will of the elite disguised as the common good.

read my reply, why did you delete your former reply

Hitler worked many jobs and fought in WW1. Marx never did shit.

Yes it does, you fucking failtroll

40 minutes of
>it wasn't REAL communism!!!

it’s called usury and used to be illegal, but after the jews won ww2 it’s suddenly the highest good.

bigthinkemoji.jpg