Look at how much energy that requires. That's not a 5G antenna like towers have. Far less energy.
Anons give me your thoughts on 5G
Nolan Collins
Dylan Robinson
Additionally, do you wonder why higher frequency carrier waves are used if they have shorter effective ranges, and don't increase data transmission rates much?
A) It lowers average latency because connected devices are closer to the tower, and there are generally fewer devices per tower
B) Waves don't propagate as far and interfere with other towers or receive interference as easily
C) Higher resolution for building X-rays and spatial analysis
D) The obvious answer: To prevent its frequency band from interfering with already extant RF broadcasts
Jacob Jackson
just wait for 6g and 7g, that will be the real shit
5g is nothing
Adam Watson
>A) It lowers average latency because connected devices are closer to the tower, and there are generally fewer devices per tower
Yes I know
>B) Waves don't propagate as far and interfere with other towers or receive interference as easily
Yes I know
>C) Higher resolution for building X-rays and spatial analysis
Yes I know
>D) The obvious answer: To prevent its frequency band from interfering with already extant RF broadcasts
I wasnt born yesterday
Robert Green
Is it really that bad in most places? Googling providers in some of your cities I see unlimited plans with 100mbps+ under 50$ pretty much everywhere. Might be worse outside of bigger cities, but that's to be expected.
Andrew Fisher
>I need to consoom product wirelessly faster!
>Fuck wifi... I need watch 4K video using my dataplan while I wait in line at the Wendies!
Jeremiah Long
If 5G was harmful, then they wouldn't even install those towers.
>BUT MUH RADIATION
it's non-ionizing. it literally doesn't have enough energy to break apart DNA.
>BUT MUH FIRE
it's being set on fire by retarded brits.