Don't you think it's funny how atheists literally can't refute Christianity?

First you have to start with the Judeo-Christian belief that there is a magic apple that gives one instant god-like knowledge when swallowed. The apples actually have magic apple power but are also cursed by the magical Jew-god called the Yahwah. You believe that Adam and Eve ate the Genesis fruit thus awakening the wrath of the Yahwah. Then the Jew-god formed an implacable grudge against humankind which could only finally be expiated by a human sacrifice. Then the Yahwah went on to literally breed with a Jewess because he experienced an irresistible messiah breeding desire after seeing the Jewish girl that he wanted to rape. Then a magical Jewish Mashiach bastard was born that later would become a rabbi and would actually be used as the very human sacrifice that the Yahwah had been waiting for in the first place because of the stolen apple! These are the Biblical Judeo-Christian beliefs that will help you construct a Biblical Judeo-Christian worldview.

Attached: 5858.jpg (435x571, 33.29K)

you guys always cryptically and then never give any real reasons for it, the few times ive been given even a crumb it doesn't even point to a christian god, just some useless deist god

>having a literal child's understanding of the garden allegory.

please educate yourself

> cannot disprove a talking snake
> cannot disapprove millions of zombies rising from the graves when Jesus died

Okay. Sure.

imagine unironically saying all this lol

Nobody cares about the opinions of memeflags, Moshe

have you even read the bible nigger? jc went back to his hometown and was ridiculed by the people who knew him as a child for claiming to be the messiah. its in the fucking bible asshat

clealrly the apple didnt work anyway

so obviously a jew made the universe. makes sense.

How do you justify worshiping a god who commands the torture of babies?

and even if it did fit his view it doesn't do shit to prove the bible right as it's all in the bible itself, "if my book is wrong then how come my book says it's right?"

Show your flag.

Do you want me to post the logical argument for the resurrection od Jesus?

The apostles have seen Jesus walk on water and raise the dead. Why would they be scared of Roman soldiers?

yes please post the logical argument for god letting his creations murder him and then raising himself from the dead so he could forgive his creations for exercising the free will that he gave them.

im not stopping you but i feel that if you had a decent one you'd open with it

Attached: when a christian tries to debate.png (709x758, 422.01K)

God bless you, my brother in Christ. Don't let these unbelievers sway you from your faith.

If Jesus didn’t rise from the dead, then the foundation for the Christian faith would be destroyed.

1. Jesus didn’t really die on the cross.
2. Jesus’ body was stolen.
3. The disciples were hallucinating.
4. The account is legendary.
5. It really happened.

All the accounts affirm he died. Pilate verified he died. During the lifetime of the eyewitnesses no one disputes his death. Secular and contemporary historians Lucian, Josephus, and Tacitus cite his death as factual.

What if the disciples faked the resurrection story by stealing Jesus’ body and then claiming he was alive? Not only was the location of the tomb well-known but the Romans had assigned guards to watch the tomb 24 hours a day. This was a trained guard unit comprised of 4 to 16 soldiers. Josh McDowell notes, “The Roman Guard unit was committed to discipline and they feared failure in any way.” It would have been impossible for anyone to have slipped by the guards unnoticed and then move the stone. Yet the stone was rolled away, making it possible for eyewitnesses to enter the tomb. And when they did, the body of Jesus was missing. If Jesus’ body was anywhere to be found, his enemies would have quickly exposed the resurrection as a fraud.

What if the disciples might have been so emotionally distraught that they hallucinated and imagined Jesus’ resurrection? Hallucination is not even a remote possibility, according to psychologist Thomas Thorburn. “It is absolutely inconceivable that 500 persons of average soundness of mind should experience all kinds of sensuous impressions, and that all these experiences should rest entirely upon hallucination.”

Is it just a Legend? Legends do not develop while multiple eyewitnesses are alive to refute them. Legends develop by oral tradition and are not supported with contemporary historical documents. The legend theory does not adequately explain either the empty tomb or the fervent conviction of the apostles that Jesus was alive.

Attached: 1586725318528.jpg (942x1309, 482.19K)

I think the problem you have is that you listened to atheists explaining you the Bible. The bible is book with many texts inside. These texts have different genres, which tell you different things about how God reveals himself to the world.
It's like reading Moby Dick and arguing about biology. Or complaining that a poem doesn't include enough historical events.

> just some useless deist god
It takes some time to show that Christianity is true. It is usually done in several steps, similar to how you teach physics in different sections, like mechanics, electricity and such. It simply takes longer than 5 minutes.
What was proven to you was probably the God of classical theism. You called that God useless, so we cannot move on to Christianity yet.
Can you tell me the attributes of this theistic God? Is he omnipresent, omniscient and omnipotent?

>If you want physical proof, you won't find any
So you're admitting it isn't true?
>Obviously God isn't a physical being,
Then he doesn't exist. If something isn't physical it isn't fuckig real
>Are you familiar with the cosmological arguments?
Yeah, they're meaningless bullshit. "I think something is real therefore it is" is not an argument. I could think I have an elf loli gf, that wouldn't make her real.

How the fuck do you think that's proof, we're talking about some tiny event 2000 years ago that wasn't even written about until way later, there's no way to prove that it happened. You're acting like there are established facts here and we can look at it all in one picture, which we absolutely can't but even if we can your reasoning still doesn't go beyond doubt. Hell, OJ got off and rightly so.

I'll ask you again: how do you justify worshipping a god who demands the torture of babies?
Your replying to pasta