I looked a couple days back on Sara Gonzalez Devant (Stella Moris/Morris) and now it's getting scrubbed all over. Her pictures, everything.
I can't vouch for the sanity of General sands but she wrote:
The agent who says she's Stella Morris and alleges she has two of Julian Assange's children is actually Sara Gonzalez Devant tied to Rothschild, Soros and many times over Pedogate. Assange has not spoken on the matter.
Her mentor Stephen M. Saideman of US Joint Staff, Council on Foreign Relations, Canadian Defence and Security Network partners with US Army War College, US Navy War College and US National War College.
how is that she has legally changed her name at some point proof for any of those claims? i recognize you leaf and you're either extremley low energy and iq or a paid shill
Grayson Miller
>how is that she has legally changed her name at some point proof for any of those claims?
You never bothered to look up the information obviously. CIA are notorious for name changes, obviously. >i recognize you leaf and you're either extremley low energy and iq or a paid shill
If you recognized me, you'd know which one I am. You seem very triggered.
Josiah Cox
Why does this "larp" push your buttons? Further investigation warranted methinks. I almost skipped this thread until I saw your reaction.
Joshua Brooks
bump for interest.
Strong scepticism of the "girlfriend" who just magically emerged. Assange was under total surveillance- how could this have only just got out
use archive before posting as things can get scrubbed within minutes of postin here.
Mason Howard
i did and i know all of your claims by someone who spouts retarded lies since years and apparently bothers enough to register domain names for assanges family. it's an psyop and you're either part of it or retarded enough to fall for it. and yes, i know who you are and as i said you're either paid to post this or a complete imbecile. in both cases you should off yourself because you will never contribute anything good to this board or the world in general.
Anthony Sullivan
>I don’t think Assange can comment on anything.
How about that he received the highest honor from Rothschild magazine the Economist?
fb . com /notes/christine-ann-sands/who-said-julian-assanges-british-partner-and-their-children-exactly-the-family-c/2620942221362077/
Jeremiah Robinson
Yeah, I am guilty for being an idiot for falling for the whole wikileak thing
Jason Davis
If I don't support Wikileaks, I support Trump. It was one or the other.
Luke Brooks
I’m most worried about Assange’s eyesight if he fell for that fuggly beast.
Hunter Robinson
Better than pam
Gavin Reed
>says a bunch of baseless bullshit without any evidence whatsoever >"r-refute my claims" go bury yourself shill. you're the cancer of this board. you're knowingly or unknowingly assisting a psyop to destroy wikileaks. justice will come your way. sage in all fields.
Nolan Jenkins
The cooking spray? Strongly disagree.
Gabriel Long
You said you saw her claims, lets see what you saw and see you refute them.
Your angry reaction only makes it more interesting for others. Nothing should be hidden or not up for discussion.
and why exactly should i waste my time in "refuting" claims someone completely makes up? there is zero evidence for anything that "person" writes and again, you're extremely stupid to fall for it or part of it. and i think the latter.
Luke Kelly
The whole thing is strange to me but lots of things about Wikileaks doesn't add up. It could mean many of things. Perhaps they are doing it for a reason that no one even knows about.
Adrian Adams
the only credible sources I found stated the embassy complained he wasn't cleaning up after his cat.
why did anonymous dessert assange? were we all just pawns back then?
