The moon has no electromagnetic field dumb dumb. That film did not come from the moon, end of story.
Only pro israel boomers still believe this shit
>Shielding is not possible
>The sun is not bright and illuminates from one side
You think you're so smart don't you? So adamant in your beliefs. And you don't even have proof. Sounds familiar.
>i just get done saying they probably wouldn't have needed special film
>"Also, they never addressed any “special film.”"
Holy fuck you are dense.
>Also, why is the OP picture have lighting as if a small but powerful light source was closeby and not a massive source from millions of miles away? A moon lit by the sun wouldn’t have studio tier light hot spots.
>t. Never Taken an Outdoor Photo
Ektachrome had about 8 stops of dynamic range or latitude. It's pretty hard not to blow out highlights in full sunlight with that range.
"Moon landing is fake" is just US government disinfo. They don't want people discussing what's actually on the moon :v)
youtube.com
i.4cdn.org
That op photo is not possible if it was taken on the moon.
>electromagnetic field STRONK!
You are absolutely and completely clueless about all aspects of radiation, aren't you?
I've studied photography for two decades. Please enlighten me as to what's wrong with it.
Im not reading all that shit nigga.
if you actually believe in the moon landings you are an irrational fuck. anyone with a brain capable of critical thinking can tell it was a hoax. Look at all the characteristics of studio lighting in the photos along with what it would take to get men to the moon. Hint the radiation belts are a big problem and the smoking gun to the hoax
You don’t understand what he’s saying because you’re retarded. The film used in the Apollo cameras would not be able to withstand the radiation and extreme temperatures of the trip to the moon and back.
>The film used in the Apollo cameras would not be able to withstand the radiation and extreme temperatures of the trip to the moon and back.
You might want to read my other posts retard.