>physically impossible for us to have even the film from the moon if we ever even went
Only pro israel boomers still believe this shit
Julian Miller
Easton Taylor
>film is in cold storage
>film was scanned to 4k and uploaded to flickr for the world
>film was also scanned to 6k for distribution from nasa's own site
>"It’s physically impossible for us to have even the film from the moon if we ever even went."
Aiden King
>impossible for the film to exist
flickr.com
Logan Jackson
>no argument
>blind faith because it makes USA look good
Good goy, the USA is a based country and totally not an israel golem. How did the film survive radiation in space both ways through the van allen belts and sitting there for hours being bombarded by unmitigated radiation on the moon? How did the film not shatter in -200 degree cold? How did the massive heat change in the internal mechanics of the camera not render it useless?
Jason Butler
From a studio on earth, nice bro.
Julian Carter
Also look at the picture in the OP. Literally movie set spotlight. See the hotspots? If this were really taken on the moon there would be no difference in intensity of light anywhere since the sun is massive. Look at a picture on earth with no clouds with a distant backdrop. Literally no difference of light intensity anywhere. Even film experts have no answer to why this famous picture and all of the rest of the apollo pictures look like they are shot under a studio spotlight.
Cooper Collins
We probably could have gone but after doing research I am 100% convinced that the broadcast and pictures supposedly taken on the moon literally cannot be real. It’s just another situation like the holocaust where they never envisioned the internet existing so they thought they could just strong arm any independent researcher who writes a book or something. I really don’t know if we went but I’m certain that the footage is bullshit. If you comb through the official video you can see parts where the astronauts make impossible movements under any type of gravity whatsoever as if they are being propped up by steel wires. There’s even a few frames where you can see light reflecting off of something feet above the astronaut. It just makes it more spooky how the telemetry data just disappeared and how we gave up further space exploration shortly after to feed african niggers instead.
Luke Baker
>How did the film survive radiation in space both ways through the van allen belts and sitting there for hours being bombarded by unmitigated radiation on the moon?
The worst mission in terms of radiation exposure was Apollo 14. They got the equivalent of roughly 3-4 years of background radiation on Earth. If you specifically look for it ISO 160 color film might show slight fogging at that age but nothing you can't correct when printing (1960s) or digitally (today). Fogging doesn't become bad until you exceed a decade.
It amazes me how people assume the Van Allen belts or the lunar surface must be like the fucking Chernobyl elephant's foot. The moon is as far away from the sun as we are. If radiation levels were high enough to destroy film or kill astronauts over the course of an 8-12 day mission there would be no life on Earth. Neither the Van Allen belts nor are atmosphere are THAT good at blocking radiation.
>How did the film not shatter in -200 degree cold?
I don't even know if they would have had to alter the base for this. But I can tell you that it would have absolutely been possible to make a custom film base that would remain flexible at -200F.
>How did the massive heat change in the internal mechanics of the camera not render it useless?
Why would it have? Film chemicals break down with extreme heat + time. Short exposures to heat that's not high enough to literally melt the film base shouldn't destroy the film.
More importantly: you are assuming the high/low temperatures experienced by the film. There's no air on the moon, therefore no convection and very little conduction of heat. That means it takes a great deal of time for an object to either radiate heat away (cool off) or absorb heat even in sunlight. The common Hollywood myth that you would freeze instantly if kicked out of an airlock is absolute bullshit.
Evan Allen
>a 1960s studio can withstand the scrutiny of 14,500 6x6 Hasselblad frames shot on Ektachrome
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Leo Morgan
>We probably could have gone but after doing research I am 100% convinced that the broadcast and pictures supposedly taken on the moon literally cannot be real.
Go to the flickr link above and show me the picture that you think is fake.