>What the system subjects us to against our will: -porn industry -rap culture/hollywood destroying the youth -transsexual children -opioid deaths by the millions -mass abortion - profit driven - fetuses used to make body lotions -poisonous food, drink, and environment -spyware products everywhere -planned obsolescence -built by the lowest bidder -shallow materialism and consumerism -breakdown of family unit and gender roles -mother earns money to pay daycare to do her 'real' job -divorce business -generic mass appeal products -morals, laws, and culture subject to profit -sociopathy rewarded, decency punished -political and social systems fully controlled by corporations -manufacturing of endless proxy wars -manipulating money is a job in itself -debt based economy -constant inflation considered normal -race to the bottom wage slavery -manufactured identity-based infighting -illusion of democratic control -mass immigration for welfare and wage suppression -only frivolities get cheaper while necessities rise in price -false dichotomy of the only alternative being bread lines
So far the goals have been: >creation of FAQ >creation of /prep/list >make memes >keep threads alive >have informative, educative and entertaining discussion
Anti-tech is nigger-tier controlled opposition thinking.
Self-sufficient technology should be highlighted.
Ideology should be removed.
Lucas Martinez
Reply to American user :
>Excuse me. I'm in and out of meetings, so I need to be brief.
No problem mate. Things be the way they be.
>I see people popping into these threads from time to time that give courtesy bumps and, in general, like the efforts put forth here. It's in part because we use Ted as a symbol and mostly because they see an honest and competent effort (by a lot of us) to spread the word. I think this lull in quality posts is temporary.
Hope you're right about the lull, user. And God bless all those faggots that keep bumping, by the way. They could just as easily sit back and NOT bump.
>I think this general can push anons over the edge into finally reading ISAIF cover to cover.
There is so much fucking raw potential here.... Don't want to be overly optimistic, but the whole of Yas Forums is just ripe to be swayed in an anti-tech direction, especially with Coronachan doing her thing. Too many reasons to enumerate right now, but basically just think about what stormfags accomplished thru sheer insistance....
>These people probably have friends (haha), and these friends won't be as willing as the user to read ISAIF. Why not give them a modern ISAIF to hand to them instead. Something they couldn't look up immediately and say: "WTF the unabomber wrote this! Are you crazy?"
This is an excellent point. Fucking Unabomber, man.... Maybe you should reiterate and reinforce this very point again in future threads, you are definitely on to something here:
In other words, ISAIF for curious polacks, and a 'new revamped-for-the-current-zeitgeist text' for their friends. It is starting to make sense. Plus, having the text be anonymous in origin may well work in favor of the spreading of the ideas themselves.
Justin Thomas
b.u.m.p.
Tyler Edwards
bump
Nicholas Nelson
Wow look at all these third-worlders who have not invented a single enduring technology. This must be a Microsoft thread.
Jordan Nelson
We can compile all valid criticism of ISAIF as a start. Then IDK. We can have a manifesto olympics or something. I don't think an essay can effectively be written by many anons. The FAQ lends itself well to this sort of approach, but the essay needs to be at least stylistically consistent. Keeping posts short to bump.
