Redpill me on the "Minor attracted person" meme

Leddit is seething right now because of this alleged Yas Forums psyop.

Given the current liberal political climate, do you actually think that there will be a legitimate push for pedo acceptance?

Attached: asdaddd.jpg (731x544, 46.51K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mfEgDiRe7_I
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Well liberals say that you can castrate your kids and put them on hormone therapy and that it is a perfectly moral thing to do so why not allow kiddy fucking too if the kid doesn't mind? Honestly its not even much of a jump in my opinion anymore

If your not pushing this your not a based accelerationist retard.
MAPS are legitimate.
MAPS are people.
MAPS pioneered the way for gay rights
#naturalove

If a kid is old enough to know it wants to "become" something it's not, it's old enough to be fucked. And that's what these tranny freaks don't tell the normies. All the alphabet people are pedos.

Does this mean the west will stop complaining about lolicon?

haha, google maps

Lmao

Well yeah, I cant think of an argument from their liberal perspective why it would not be perfectly acceptable

only after you stop censoring them

all sodomites are pedophiles

This, and checked. Acting as if a 7yo should be able to decide to chop off his dick and balls is absolutely a step toward acting as if a 7yo should be able to decide to "date" grown men.

This. Make the faggots cannibalize each other.

Push it to who? I don't have twitter and no one would see it if I did.

Step towards? Nigga, that's 12 steps after you've won the marathon

How is wanting to fuck a kid different from wanting to fuck a man in his butchered “front hole”? They both go against nature.

>Given the current liberal political climate, do you actually think that there will be a legitimate push for pedo acceptance?

Not in the immediate future, but within 15 - 20 years I think it will happen. They can only take the earliest steps right now. The rest of society still has a healthy repulsion to pedos, and there are valid concerns about consent that weren't present in the debates over casual sex, homosexuality, and transexuality.

For now they will just wear down at the borders of cultural resistance to pedophilia. At first it will be showing more sexualized teenagers and children in the media, but in situations involving other minors. Along with that will be essays and editorials in the "intellectual" magazines and journals that take a critical approach to concepts like age of consent, without directly challenging them. Then you will see sympathetic portrayals of pedophiles in artsy movies and documentaries, but they will be attractive women instead of gross creepy men. After that, funny and relatable male pedo characters on sitcoms and comedy movies.

Once the public has been conditioned to see pedos as kind of weird, but "not so bad as our parents thought", then the big political push will begin.

>Redpill me on the "Minor attracted person" meme.
They're trying to normalize it so it gets added to the alphabet of protected sexuality.

I would say that one situation involves a person who can't give effective consent, but then I realized someone who cuts his dick off is probably not in his right mind, either.

It's not a jump at all, I'd argue a kid having a relationship with an adult is nowhere near as damaging as having a 3 year old take estrogen pills with the aim of having his junk chopped up and a permanently open wound being put in its place. They've already accepted this shit, pedos are no big deal to them.

However while they still think pedophilia is taboo, we should definitely push the point. Start making LGBTQMAP+ shit and divide them, it won't stop shit but it might slow it down a little.

>How is wanting to fuck a kid different from wanting to fuck a man in his butchered “front hole”? They both go against nature.
One is traumatizing to someone who is innocent, the other is a degenerate act against someone who is already mentally traumatized

All sodomites are degenerate agents of Satan. They should all be purged.

>we just want to be left alone.
>what happens in the bedroom isn't your business
>we want to be married in your church, user
>yes 8 year olds should take hormones
>we're not pushing our degeneracy on you, user
>bake the cake bigot
>take the wedding photos or we'll sue you out of business
>will you chop my dick of, user, so I can affirm my new gender?
>can I fuck your child, user?
>we were born this way we can't change

Attached: C7D8BB16-89C1-461C-B830-2A577A0D6C4F.gif (260x183, 903.6K)

Have you learned nothing from the past 50 years? All you need to be is a voice. A vocal minority trumps the majority 100% of the time. Whenever you see someone arguing in favor of MAPS back them up as much as possible. Do this with fake accounts so you don't fuck your social credit score.

C

>what is nambla

>Compare tranny kid rights and MAP rights
>(((they))) either seeth or try normalizing MAPs too
>???
>Name the jew
>Profit?

>Assumes all gays are pedos and trannys
God hates you and your ignorance. You're no better than a pedo

It's been brewing for quite a while.
Shoeonhead had a vid about it since almost a year ago:
youtube.com/watch?v=mfEgDiRe7_I

Degenerate fucktards that should get a bullet to the fucking head is what I think.

I don't see what the rational defence would be for a person trying to maintain both that (1) a kid is mature enough from age 6 and on to decide to go on some hormone blocking therapy to change gender and (2) minors are too dumb, immature, unwise and under developed to decide what kind of sexual contact they may have with some partner.

Now, since I personally oppose (1) I can also defend (2) on exactly the same ground. But I don't see how someone that accept (1) can.

Also: WHY IS Yas Forums BEING FUCKING ATTACKED BY THE CAPTCHA?

No, God hates you and all fags.
Shoe does crack with trannies and is a literal female cuckold

>the meme that was thrown around years ago is slowly becoming real

This is just getting better and better, sad. Yes, there will be a push, but it will be gradual. One degeneracy at the time, wearing people down and making them accept progressively increasing depravity. They are still trying to normalize tranny illness for the time being, so the focus is there.

you know nothing. all sexually deviant activity is sin and punishable by death. faggotry, transgenderism, pedophilia, fornication and adultery all fall into this category. you get the rope first.

repent, faggot.

Attached: repent..jpg (600x600, 33.52K)

fags rape kids more than any group lol

Why is homosexuality a real sexuality, but "pedophilia" isn't?

Attached: vanilla2.jpg (820x699, 169.73K)

I cant think any rational defence either, its just that liberals dont like the idea, atleast not yet, in their mad quest for inclusivity they eventually will include every sort of degenerate behaviour and I believe that in the end it will be good for us normal people who find all this sexual deviancy repulsive, people may not question gay weddings but they will question all of it when it goes too far

>>what is nambla

A fringe political organization with next to no influence in American politics.

Literally the only reason why the Alphabet faggots are pushing against this because it includes adult male and minor girls under MAP. Faggots fuck little boys all the time and are open about it too.
Allowing adult male and minor girl relationships would actually be a return to how things were traditionally (age of consent was feminist-supported law when it was first created). The only real "age of consent" is "age of whenever you get married".

Attached: 1576958284575.jpg (1200x1753, 379.46K)