Is this the hidden purpose of mass surveillance (sold as 5G/Internet of Things/"smart cities")?
sciencedaily.com
>Quantum mechanics states that particles can also behave as waves. This can be true for electrons at the submicron level, i.e., at distances measuring less than one micron, or one thousandth of a millimeter. When behaving as waves, they can simultaneously pass through several openings in a barrier and then meet again at the other side of the barrier. This "meeting" is known as interference.
>Strange as it may sound, interference can only occur when no one is watching. Once an observer begins to watch the particles going through the openings, the picture changes dramatically: if a particle can be seen going through one opening, then it's clear it didn't go through another. In other words, when under observation, electrons are being "forced" to behave like particles and not like waves.
Does being watched 24/7 have such an effect on human consciousness, forcing it to act in a certain predictable way, even if the person doesn't realize or care about being watched? Is this the reason why they have been pushing mass surveillance so intently? Did they manufacture this disease for the sole purpose of forcing the population to accept it?
Is this the hidden purpose of mass surveillance (sold as 5G/Internet of Things/"smart cities")?
Other urls found in this thread:
dailymail.co.uk
archive.4plebs.org
washingtonpost.com
cnbc.com
dailymail.co.uk
qz.com
realityblurred.com
gulfnews.com
forbes.com
edition.cnn.com
blogs.wsj.com
thaipbsworld.com
straitstimes.com
inquirer.com
hoodline.com
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
archive.org
centerforhealthsecurity.org
twitter.com
dailymail.co.uk
>Apple and Google are joining forces in a bid to develop technology where smartphones can warn users that they may potentially be exposed to coronavirus.
>The rival companies are opening up their mobile operating systems so both iPhone and Android devices can run contact tracing apps.
>These work by using a mobile's Bluetooth signals to track every other phone its user has come into close contact with.
>The implementation has raised concerns over potential beaches of privacy, though the tech giants insist that the data will be anonymous and that 'privacy, transparency and consent are of utmost importance'.
sure it will, but what if the government forces you to own a "smartphone" with such an application installed and carry it everywhere? As it stands, I have to fill, print and sign a declaration to take one step outside or I can receive a fine.
...
bump
Yes but my gypsy friend, you can always choose to burn down telephone poles and electric wires. You choose instead to comply with your government which locks you in your home.
It's like this: I'm tired of the US government and I'm tired of being ruled over by Wallstreet nigger brained faggots. I'm okay with dying if it means I don't have to live in a world where I'm chipped like a fucking farm animal and have to ask for permission to leave my home.
As it currently stands, I have to ask for permission to carry a gun outside. I have to ask for permission to go shoot my gun in the woods. I have to ask for permission to hunt, I have to ask for permission to fish or even to hike on the fucking trails of a National park that my tax $$$$'s pays for. I have to ask for permission to take my kids out of the fucking joke that is public school education (i.e. brainwashing camp for faggots and drooling retards). I even have to ask for permission to start a business and apparently, when a pandemic strikes, we have to ask for permission to make money so we can put food on the table.
Where does it fucking end?
You have to draw the line somewhere and if you faggot cucked sheep are just going to sit around with a finger up your ass that's your business but that's not how I want to live. I'm not an insect, I'm not tax cattle and I'm not a slave to the corporations.
Yes. Theyve known about it for a long time.
Its called the “chilling effect”
>In a legal context, a chilling effect is the inhibition or discouragement of the legitimate exercise of natural and legal rights by the threat of legal sanction.[1] The right that is most often described as being suppressed by a chilling effect is the US constitutional right to free speech. A chilling effect may be caused by legal actions such as the passing of a law, the decision of a court, or the threat of a lawsuit; any legal action that would cause people to hesitate to exercise a legitimate right (freedom of speech or otherwise) for fear of legal repercussions. When that fear is brought about by the threat of a libel lawsuit, it is called libel chill.[2] A lawsuit initiated specifically for the purpose of creating a chilling effect may be called a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation ("SLAPP").
They know they can control behavior by measurment.
>YEAH WE ELITE NEED TO SPY ON CATTLE.
IT'S ABOUT SPIRIT COOKING AND DRIVERLESS CARS.
YOU KNOW, THE ONES THAT WILL BE TAKING PEOPLE
TO CAMPS :)
it all makes sense now...
>less than one micron, or one thousandth of a millimeter
A micron is one millionth of a meter.