On December 30, 2019. Li Wenliang, a doctor at the Wuhan Central Hospital, told his colleagues that 7 people were diagnosed with SARS infections that were traced back to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, and that precautions should be taken. A few days later, Li was "educated" by the police to "not spread rumors". In the end, he was proven right - patients were coming in with a "new type of coronary pneumonia" and one of them even infected him on January 12: >I was very worried at first, but the doctor would comfort me every day when I went to the ward. I am no longer feverish, and my mental state is better than a few days ago. I believe the hospital and the doctor, I will definitely be cured. After recovering, I want to quickly return to the front line and continue to see the patient.
So he was on his way to health. His parents also got infected and fully recovered: >My parents also had fever and other symptoms after me. The lung CT showed ground-glass lesions. They are being treated in other hospitals in Wuhan, but they are all fine now, without any problems
However, he ended up dying, even though he wasn't in the age group (34) that dies from corona. And yet, his parents - aged over 60 - have been able to recover "without any problems". There's more suspicious things about this story. Take a look at Li's photo from Wikipedia (pic related) compared to the photo of the allegedly sick Li. Looks like a completely different guy. Face shape, hair and eyes seem to differ, but the biggest clue is the lack of moles on the first photo, which happen to exist in the second. This would not have been the first time the elites replaced someone. Also, why was Li reported as dead, and later revived? >edition.cnn.com/2020/02/06/asia/china-li-wenliang-whistleblower-death-timeline-intl-hnk/index.html Clearly, the official story already stinks with fakery from a thousand miles - so let's dig deeper into this case...
October 18, 2019. A New York City hotel is holding a pandemic drill >centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about which is supposed to educate the world leaders on what to do if such a situation arised in real life. You can check out the full list of participants here >centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/players/index.html - for now, just note that it contained people both from the USA and China. The highlight video of the event mentions stuff such as:
- The virus could cause a worldwide pandemic if not quickly controlled - It spreads extremely fast - Can only be combatted through corpos and governments from different countries working together - Vaccine not likely to appear early enough to be useful - Countries banning travel, flights being cancelled - Economic collapse - Governments being at war with the virus - Social media platforms censoring "inaccurate" information - Loss of faith in government
Literally everything stated in the video has later happened in the real world. But the single piece of evidence that seals the deal is the fact that they mentioned a novel coronavirus right at the start - instead of any one of the hundreds other possible infections. How could they have known, if this wasn't planned in advance? They said that this wasn't a prediction and that the simulation was based on SARS (also a coronavirus) - but again, why not any of the other possible infections? And why did they get everything else right? These vermin have engineered this so-called pandemic and now - by saying "it's a coincidence, lol" - are mocking us right into our faces.
Cooper Young
How dangerous is the new coronavirus? Let's analyze infection rates.
On February 11, the amount of worldwide cases was 45134. Of course, that wasn't enough for the scaremongers so they started including clinically diagnosed cases (archive.is/mfBAj) which means they used symptoms, instead of actual testing - adding 15152 cases in one day. That's much better for our super serious pandemic. However, even the stats from testing are fake since the tests are only 20% accurate: >When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67% unboundmedicine.com/medline/citation/32133832/[Potential_false_positive_rate_among_the_'asymptomatic_infected_individuals'_in_close_contacts_of_COVID_19_patients]_
This means that - out of five people tested positive for the novel coronavirus - only one of them actually has it. There will also be people who are tested negative, yet do actually have the virus >One problem is the test can have minor errors. Primers can grab onto a piece of DNA in the wrong way or be led astray by contamination from a previous sample or the throat swab may not contain enough virus. All these could lead to a wrong result. Chinese scientists say in practice, just 30-50 percent of infected patients test positive. news.cgtn.com/news/2020-02-11/Science-Behind-Virus-How-to-test-for-new-coronavirus-NZjFdcj9aE/index.html
Aiden Howard
Some people are even tested positive days after already recovering and being released from the hospital after two negative tests: >Four medical professionals with COVID-19 who met the criteria for hospital release or lifting of quarantine in China had positive real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results 5 to 13 days later, according to a research letter published yesterday in JAMA. cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/02/some-covid-19-patients-test-positive-days-after-recovery The mainstream interpretation, of course, was that they haven't actually recovered and still had the virus. If so, why did two tests come out negative? The saner interpretation is that the test is a total joke. And yet, everyone takes the statistics based on this crap as gospel. Of course, you could say it's just the Chinese test, but since that was the place with the highest amount of cases, it still invalidates a significant percentage of the stats. Of course, China was also sending the faulty tests to other countries, some of which rejected them (see Spain) The WHO test, developed in Germany, is allegedly more accurate. However, it seems to also react with other bat viruses, not just the nCov: >To show that the assays will detect other bat-associated SARS-related viruses, we tested bat-derived fecal samples available from Drexler et al., (3) und Muth et al., (4) using the novel assays [...] All samples were successfully tested positive by the E gene assay. who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/protocol-v2-1.pdf
Noah Gray
So, if you had some other bat virus, you might also test positive for corona. Of course, we don't really know what kinds of tests is each country using and how accurate they are. There were reports of test kit contamination - so you could have literally gotten the virus if you used those. Faults inherent in PCR testing also exist: >The success of rRT-PCR testing depends on several factors, including the experience and expertise of laboratory personnel, laboratory environment (e.g., avoidance of contamination), and the type and condition of specimens being tested. cdc.gov/coronavirus/mers/lab/lab-testing.html
Even if we assumed the tests were perfect (disconfirmed above), the people going to be tested are the ones who already have symptoms. See the testing policy for one of the US hospitals: >He explained that the most eligible to receive testing for coronavirus are those who are already very sick with something such as pneumonia, or an individual who already requires use of a respirator. ktar.com/story/3031974/phoenix-er-doctor-outlines-criteria-for-receiving-coronavirus-test/ Or the Indian policy: >India has only been testing those who have travelled from affected countries or come in contact with a confirmed case and shown symptoms after two weeks of quarantine. On Tuesday it added health care workers with symptoms who are treating patients with severe respiratory illnesses. indiatoday.in/india/story/coronavirus-covid-19-testing-india-1656728-2020-03-18 This heavy selection bias will further increase the reported rate of infection (since the people without symptoms - that would be tested negative - will just sit at home). Okay, so maybe the infection stats are unreliable. But still, lots of people are dying, aren't they?
Brayden Young
>b-but that wasn't the REAL coronavirus kek
Ayden Reyes
ANALYZING THE DEATH RATES:
The people who are actually dying are either old or suffer from other diseases. Check this out: >On Tuesday, the number of fatalities in England increased by 14. NHS England said those who died were aged between 45 and 93 and all had underlying health conditions. news.sky.com/story/uk-coronavirus-cases-reach-1-950-up-407-in-24-hours-11958875 So, 14 new cases, and not a single one can be confirmed to actually have died from corona. Yet, in the statistics, all the deaths will of course be attributed to the virus - despite the fact that heart disease or diabetes have no problem killing on their own, both being in the top 10 causes of death. For more confirmation, go through virusncov.com and you'll see the vast majority of reported deaths are either old people or ones with underlying conditions. In fact, it seems that it's almost impossible to die without those pre-existing diseases. See: worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/
What about Italy, which has the highest death rate out of all the countries? Funnily enough, this is the strongest example for proving my thesis. According to Silvio Brusaferro - head of Italy's health institute - not one of the over 4000 deaths has been confirmed to be from corona: >Rome, 13 mar 19: 12- (Agenzia Nova) - people who died from coronavirus in Italy, who had no other pathologies, could be only two. This is what appears from the medical records examined so far by the Istituto superiore di sanità, according to the president of the Institute, Silvio Brusaferro, during the press conference held today at the Civil Protection in Rome. "Positive deceased patients have an average of over 80 years - 80.3 to be exact - and are basically predominantly male"
Luis Roberts
>these two pictures look different the one on the left is heavily pixelated, he's wearing glasses, and in a different position. no shit. >nah man china dindu nuffin wrong stfu
Cameron Scott
cont. >Only two people were not at the moment carriers of pathologies, but even in these two cases, the examination of the records is not concluded and could, therefore, emerge causes of death other than Covid-19. So, not only were the people who died old (look at the chart at the top of this report to realize anyone under age 60 is pretty much immune), but they've also all had chronic diseases - both massive causes of death that certainly don't need help from some puny virus. The deaths are also almost all from heavily polluted areas - yet another contributing factor independent from corona. Despite that, they will be all attributed to COVID-19 in the stats. So, the virus doesn't appear too harmful - but I've heard it's extremely contagious. What about that?
Sebastian Miller
ANALYZING CONTAGION:
What would you guess is the probability of catching the virus if you live with someone who already has it? According to the media hype, you'd think it's pretty much a certainty. And yet the WHO's report tells a different story: >preliminary studies ongoing in Guangdong estimate the secondary attack rate in households ranges from 3-10% who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/who-china-joint-mission-on-covid-19-final-report.pdf
What about non-family specific close contacts? >As of 17 February, in Shenzhen City, among 2842 identified close contacts, 2842 (100%) were traced and 2240 (72%) have completed medical observation. Among the close contacts, 88 (2.8%) were found to be infected with COVID-19. >As of 17 February, in Sichuan Province, among 25493 identified close contacts, 25347 (99%) were traced and 23178 (91%) have completed medical observation. Among the close contacts, 0.9% were found to be infected with COVID-19. >As of 20 February, in Guangdong Province, among 9939 identified close contacts, 9939 (100%) were traced and 7765 (78%) have completed medical observation. Among the close contacts, 479 (4.8%) were found to be infected with COVID-19.
So, 38274 people - who were all in close contact with someone infected - were tested in three different locations, and the overall rate of contagion was a puny 3.1%. To better visualise this: imagine a corona-infected person shaking hands with 100 different people - only 3 of them will catch the virus. Of course, the types and durations of "close contacts" will be different, but you can expect the average contagion rate to be about 3%. For a practical example, check this: cmaj.ca/content/lack-covid-19-transmission-international-flight
As we can see, both the statistics and real life seem to show that nCov is not very contagious. Okay, so all of infection rates, death rates, and contagion rates have been way overstated. But I've also heard...
Jordan Taylor
>posts: 8 >posters: 3
Take your meds
Lucas Barnes
Bane?
Christian Hall
OTHER FAKE CLAIMS:
>That the hospitals are overcrowded with dying patients? That's literally fake news - journalists have gone to those hospitals, and saw no one there. (bitchute.com/video/XxeGUIBPVleu/) See also #FilmYourHospial >That young, healthy people are dying too? But were they really healthy? Many young people are not so healthy anymore and many chronic diseases develop without symptoms until in advanced stage. I doubt the doctors have been subjecting all those victims to a battery of tests which would have shown early heart disease, pre-diabetes, hormone abnormalities, low vitamin levels, etc. Besides, the media is faking those claims too. A healthy 16 year old woman dies - now how do we turn this into a coronavirus death? First test came out negative, second as well...finally, the third one was positive. There, we've got the young corona death we were looking for! dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8159309/Schoolgirl-16-no-underlying-medical-conditions-Frances-youngest-coronavirus-victim.html
Colton Gray
>That the experts are saying most of the world will get infected and/or die? These predictions are based on computer modeling which requires knowing pretty much everything about the virus in question. How long it takes to infect someone else, how many other people will an average person infect, how many people will quarantine themselves and for how long, whether they travel or wear masks, how long does the virus stay around in a form that is able to infect others, does the virus mutate to weaker or stronger variants, obviously the accuracy of tests, possible treatments and lots of other factors. If any one of those assumptions is wrong, the whole thing falls like a house of cards. I mean, just look how big of a difference in results did the Imperial College report get just by switching a few assumptions - and again, those were not even close to all of them. >imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf And since we can't know most of this with any sort of accuracy (and some of the assumptions have already been proven wrong), the claims are pretty much fortune telling but less fun.
I could go on - new fake claims appear all the time - but there isn't much point. Since the basis for the corona panic has pretty much evaporated, the question that needs to be asked now is: What is the actual point of the fake pandemic?
Matthew Reyes
THE BLUEPRINT FOR SLAVERY
Let's look at what kinds of changes have happened in the world as a result of this fraudulent pandemic: >Travel restrictions in many countries >Shutting down of schools, churches and other places >Panic buying leading to fights over toilet paper >Increased digital surveillance in Israel, Iran, Australia and many other countries >Forced home quarantines, even with no evidence you're infected - complete with fines or beatdowns for resisting >A massive, coordinated, worldwide crackdown on any non-official / alternative information >Social distancing recommendations, including no handshakes and a ban on meetings with more than two people
Now, let's do a thought experiment. Imagine there's no coronavirus - what would you call all of the above, then? For me, the most fitting term is slavery. After all, what is there to do? You can't leave the country, town or for many people - even the house; can't go to a sports event, can't talk to or even be near people, can't cut your hair or blow your money in a casino since all that stuff is closed. Independent info is gone (at least from the biggest platforms) and we're bombarded with propaganda every waking second. People are being prevented from touching their faces, or using cash. Denmark is even implementing a forced vaccine law: >Denmark’s parliament on Thursday night unanimously passed an emergency coronavirus law which gives health authorities powers to force testing, treatment and quarantine with the backing of the police. >“It is time to put aside party politics and be together to do what it takes to bring Denmark safely through this situation.” investmentwatchblog.com/denmark-has-passed-a-law-that-will-allow-the-authorities-to-force-people-to-be-vaccinated-for-coronavirus/
James Sullivan
China's surveillance state might also stick around after the end of the "epidemic": >However, experts fear that this mass data collection could continue after the coronavirus is less of a public-health threat, and becomes a permanent addition to the Communist Party surveillance's state. businessinsider.com/coronavirus-china-surveillance-police-state-xinjiang-2020-2
A nanon explains the privacy and freedom violations in Italy: >They keep changing the fucking rules all the fucking times, they say they want to change them again now, every time they do it is worst. >You can never be sure about what happens when police stops you cause a lot of times it completely depends on their interpretation if your reason to be out is valid or not. >Now going back to your own home is not a valid reason to be out anymore so there is lot of people stuck in other parts of the country and unable to go home. >You cannot do any physical activity anymore, not even alone which is completely retarded. >These rules also apply to parts of Italy that have very few cases which is also retarded.
Quoting an article from the biggest Italian newspaper (translation graciously provided by the nanon in question: >We need to suspend the privacy regulations in order to track people movements like it was done in South Korea so that we can contain the coronavirus spread. It is Luca Zaia governor of the Veneto region which is one of the regions that were hit harder together with Lombardia and Emilia Romagna that is launching this proposal again. "In this nation I am convinced that we need to suspend the current privacy regulations and give more freedom to the medical system", this is what he said to journalists. He continued "About the tracking Israel offered to help us with the movement tracking using intelligent systems. The best way is to focus on civic sense". repubblica.it/politica/2020/03/26/news/zaia_sospensione_privacy-252373104/
Mason Thomas
The tech giants are also increasing the censorship on their platforms, which very likely won't ever be rolled back: >Content that increases the chance that someone contracts or transmits the virus, including: >-Denial of expert guidance >-Encouragement to use fake or ineffective treatments, preventions, and diagnostic techniques >-Misleading content purporting to be from experts or authorities reclaimthenet.org/twitter-blocks-some-coronavirus-links/ oneangrygamer.net/2020/04/twitter-censoring-tweets-they-feel-increases-risk-of-transmitting-coronavirus/ I wasn't aware that the virus is spread by the Internet now - must be extremely powerful, better quarantine our computers. The aim here is to normalize the dependence on the experts, and prevent finding or sharing independent research, or even daring to question the safety of the official measures, as certain journalists unfortunately learned.This will, of course, eventually apply to all other alternative medicine - Corona is just the Trojan Horse by which we get scared into following "the experts".
Ultimately, the ruling elites want the full control of people. To accomplish that, they need good enough excuses to prevent them from rioting (assuming it would even happen, but they want to play it safe) School shootings, terrorist attacks, environmental disasters, and now pandemics, set up exactly this purpose. If you scare people enough, you can get them to give up their freedom in the name of safety. The coronavirus provides an almost perfect excuse; it's invisible, deadly and contagious. It has allowed them to lock people up in their homes, as well as implement distance policies, minimize direct human contact, continue the war on cash, censor independent research, track you digitally, etc. These seem like exactly the kind of changes you'd want to enact to prevent an organized counter-attack. And from the reaction to this fake pandemic, it's easy to deduce that people won't stand up.
Anthony Brooks
These statistics from Poland show that only 3% of people are against the draconian government policies. Indians have even accepted being marked like animals. This is called learned helplessness and is the state of mind that the people in power want to put you in with every fake event. After they're confident there's no danger of retaliation anymore, they will implement the changes they want without the need for an excuse. There is some hope though: >Neder said she and her son were placed in quarantine for several days and were told to await testing for the deadly virus. While in the hospital, Neder says she took a pregnancy test and discovered she was pregnant. Neder told The Times that the conditions at the hospital left her desperate to escape. „The conditions there were awful. Doctors were very unprofessional and not wearing any protective gear,“ she said. „We had no choice but to jump out of [the] window. >Another woman named Alla Ilyina told The Times that she had been quarantined in a St. Petersburg hospital after returning from Hainan last month. Despite testing negative for the coronavirus, she remained under lockdown in the hospital, which she likened to a „cage.“ >„I drew up a map before and made a detailed plan,“ she told The Times. „When evening came and the medical staff had let their guard down, I short-circuited the magnetic lock in my containment room and opened the door.“ Sounds almost like escaping a high-security prison. However, this kind of stuff would need to happen on a mass-scale - including standing up to the would-be kidnappers. However, lone wolves cannot enact the necessary systemic changes. Eventually, the police, media, AI surveillance, courts, prisons, etc. would take care of them and break the spirits of everyone else. To combat this, people need to meet up and plan for a destruction of the above systems enslaving them - but with the scare isolating everyone from each other, that's becoming increasingly unlikely.
There are lots of theories for the origin of the virus. The mainstream have mostly focused on animal hosts, especially bats, but also pangolins and snakes. Alternative media have jumped onto the bioweapon theories - whether created by the USA or the Chinese. I was even able to find a theory of the virus being brought by a meteorite: >sott.net/article/428971-Coronavirus-came-from-meteor-which-hit-China-last-year-claims-scientist How to make sense of all this? For me, all the above theories are disinformation. They all start from the assumption that there is a single "novel coronavirus". The first genetic sequence of the virus was uploaded to GenBank on January 10 (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988269/). On March 24, Iceland scientists found 40 different variants already (nypost.com/2020/03/24/iceland-scientists-found-40-mutations-of-the-coronavirus-report-says/) and all those came only from 3 different countries. How many more are there running around elsewhere, or undetected? And have any of those been shown to cause the diseases attributed to nCov?
Just by that we can see that the single, murderous "COVID-19" we've been threatened with is an illusion.
Nathaniel Stewart
I dont want to listen to your mix tape
Daniel Powell
It's just Anglo-Saxon mission dude
Juan Walker
Goddamn Yankee mutts who still think the Corona is some hilarious prank need a proper Islamic beheading at this point. The fact that your shitty government has a hard on to use this crisis to make Chicom authoritarianism a joke is NONE of our problems, and it doesn't diminish the fact that the COVID 19 strain is a real deadly corona virus and the lockdowns are fucking justified. These are also the degenerate faggots that try to lecture us how we'd be worse off under Chinese foreign influence. I hope each and every one of you drown in jewish phlegm, like you'd all love to be
Chase Cooper
Also its not our fault that American "businesses" aren't cash solvent and are so bad at fre market that the small ones are now gonna soon be all bought up by Walmart or something. You all deserve communism.
Henry Murphy
Take your HRT pills faggot
Christian Sanders
>posts: 22 >posters: 8
I implore you to consume your medication
Caleb Miller
Thanks, it stank from the beginning with all those videos out of Wuhan, it just seemed so stage managed, the doctor stories were too convenient, and then comes the oil crash, and all the other countries joining in or face the jewish media onslaught, as well as globalist condemnation. Fuck all these globalist kike commies now they are openly calling for communism "temporarily" to get the economy on track. Death to all these traitorous scum.
Luke Bailey
>even though he wasn't in the age group (34) that dies from corona
0.2% die in that age range
Which is 1 in 500
Adam Morris
>Literally everything stated in the video has later happened in the real world so they did a good job then. what's your point? tell us in your own words instead of spamming walls of text. a sars like virus has been predicted for years. it has always been a case of when not if.
the real crime is that we never got prepared for it. well that and china's fucking lies.
Ian Sullivan
Americans deserve nothing but communism. They can't handle the free market forces, an unpredictable pandemic is part of it.
Dylan Rivera
this, gentlemen, is someone who is a schizo 20 times the same thread in a day on multiple fucking boards take your meds
Benjamin Williams
>However, he ended up dying, even though he wasn't in the age group (34) that dies from corona. Old age is a risk factor for death, not an absolute requirement for it. Being a doctor greatly increases your chances of dying from it too. There have been papers out on the increased viral load from many interactions being more harmful than if you're just exposed once.
Luke Anderson
Link to the archive post, then. I've never posted this before.
Grayson Lopez
Interesting fact: hospitals get $13,000 from Medicare per COVID-19 diagnosis and $39,000 for every pation that goes no a ventilator. youtube.com/watch?v=IkMSEHmeaNQ
