West coast forming an interstate compact against congressional approval

Doesnt seem like a big deal. Whats the problem?

United States Constitution
>Article I, Section 10
>"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State."

Watch Trump do nothing.

Attached: 1568329812934.gif (480x320, 2.05M)

Forming interstate pacts and agreements without congress is a violation of federal law.

Okay and? Is the nature of this pact dangerous in any way?

Your governor is just following orders. They are going to starve you a bit you make you take the vaccine. If you do this we can get food production back, but not before. Meanwhile your ancestors kept farming while the black plague killed half of Europe.

>dangerous
Depends on how you define dangerous. Would the southern states forming a pact for segregated schools be dangerous?

My man our governor has increased drug overdose deaths in my state by 700% since 2016 and made it basically impossible for police to do their job in any capacity even when responding to emergencies. She's actively killing this state and entering into an interstate agreement will be in every way against our best interests.

I dont really think thats comparable. These states are forming an agreement to help each other deal with the virus itself and the eocnomic fallout from the virus. I really dont see a problem.

ok boomer

I'm sure your governor is retarded. I'm a californian, Newsom is retarded and I hate hhim. But I dont really see how this particular compact is relevant to those kinds of social policies.

NE kike shitlib rathole states are doing the same thing

>A hastily organized press conference involving the governors from six northeastern states - NY, NJ, CT, RI, DE, RI, PA - is underway, as the group explain to the public how they will work together to cut costs and pool resources to battle the epidemic, and coordinate the difficult decision of reopening the regional economy.

>Earlier, several governors insisted that they and they alone would decide when to reopen their states, and the briefing was apparently called after President Trump insisted he had the sole power to reopen the states - which many immediately rebuffed.

>At the briefing, the governors' response was delivered by New Hampshire's Tom Wolfe.

>"Since we had the responsibility of closing the state down...we have the responsibilioty for opening it up...you've got to get people healthy first before reopening the economy, or it's not going to work...we're almost ready to start moving on to the next sense which is moving back to some semblance of a new normal," said New Hampshire Gov. Tom Wolfe. "It was our responsibility to steer our way through these uncharted waters and it's our responsibility to steer our way back."

They are BEGGING for a civil war.
Now watch Zion Don do absolutely nothing.

How is that begging for civil war? Wheres the antagonism?

I suppose could then say to these states, No more Federal funds for you. For anything. Including FDIC bank insurance. Nada.

>hastily organized
The Tri-state accord has been in place for almost a month now and they've been doing joint governor conferences regularly. National news only shows the Cuomo ones but local carries the joint one's usually just Cuomo/Murphy but sometimes Wolf and/or Lamont will show up. Only surprise here was that rhode island and delaware joined on out of nowhere. The west coast one and whatever is going on in new england are new as of today.

>How is that begging for civil war? Wheres the antagonism?
It's the slippery slope. CA, OR, and WA are trying to band together to defy a presidential order to get back to work. A nation divided cannot stand.

>A nation divided cannot stand.

Good. The U.S. is a dangerous, unwieldy colossus. A loose confederation of regions would make for a much more peaceful and prosperous existence.

>West coast states banding together
>New England states banding together
>Atlantic States banding together
Isn't this exactly what Trump was saying he wanted states to handle things, so when they're handling things that's a problem? Way too many newfags shilling for big government, you would think king nigger was still in charge.

>science - not politics

Attached: images.jpg (225x225, 12.44K)

>Isn't this exactly what Trump was saying he wanted
Well now he's saying he wants it different, and youse guys better wise up.

holy fuck its happening

Attached: cuckmap.png (2568x1435, 2.04M)

Attached: Interstate Compacts.png (1280x853, 169.44K)

>all the whitest states controlled by marxists

Draw some alternating lines through NH/MA/VT, they're not formal but they started sharing supplies today from whoever can get their hands on stuff first.

Women and californians in government is a mistake. Also spics. Smart black men are allowed though but no affirmative action.

Trump doesnt have unilateral authority like he claimed today. The states are semi sovereign. They arent just federal districts. If the states want to collaborate to maximize supply chain efficiency, then let them.

>The states are semi sovereign.
They have no armies unless you consider the state police an army. National Guard was turned over to presidential control some years back.

I mean the states are the only entity with absolute power, checked only by each other, if the states(or enough of them) were on the same page about something they could just start proposing and ratifying amendments that completely stripped away federal power and the only thing the Federal government could do is dictate which of two ways the states vote on ratification. A big part of why the federal government got so large is because with more and more states it becomes increasingly difficult for them to be on the same page.

Of course its comparable.
States banding together to segregate schools would be the same as "dealing with economic fallout" of having a bunch of niggers ruining public schools for white children.

The dangerous thing about states banding together is that they are, in effect, forming their own government, separate from the federal government. If five states said they wanted to ignore whatever aspect of the federal government that they dont like, what's to stop them from ignoring other parts of federal law, or the entire federal government in general?

Nothing.

This is literally Ca, Or, and Wa saying "fuck you" to Trump and the federal administration. This is literally a declaration of civil war.

"Ststes rights" haven't been a thing since 1865. Trump has two choices: ignore this, and implicitly encourage every other state to band together for their own interests (leading to balkanization and collapse), or send in the marines to arrest these governors for treason. It is actually THAT serious.

I suppose he could allow this, but then why would he permit those states to vote in the federal elections, since they haven't obeyed federal law in the first place?

This is the first steps to the dissolution of the Union. These are exciting times!

What are they going to do

checked. boogaloo inc.

Attached: 1416559696836.png (976x977, 102.31K)