They are pretty much trolling us at this point.
When did you first realize that the most prestigious news organizations in the world are just propaganda outlets?
They are pretty much trolling us at this point.
When did you first realize that the most prestigious news organizations in the world are just propaganda outlets?
Other urls found in this thread:
archive.fo
youtu.be
twitter.com
About the time Obama signed an executive order to make it legal for them to do so.
>most prestigious news organizations in the world
lol, no
thank God for the way back in time machine.
when i was 12 i guess, even as a child you should be able to figure out why things are presented as only black and white
they're taking china money. a lot of these companies would be dead in the water years ago me thinks
Can somebody give me the definition of the word "mourner", please?
25 years ago
More trolling.
> hey, this guy is charged with giving illegal donations to hillary, what picture should we use?
> him with trump
> now you see it
> now you don't
January 3, 2013
When the US repealed anti-propaganda laws.
Link to tweet? I want to laugh
Archived copy because the truth bureau deleted it: archive.fo
Does anyone have a NYT article about what constitutes sexual harassment?
Replacement is just a theory, you bigot.
fpbp.
I know it's faggy to write sigh, but that's how I feel about the fact that you are correct about that happening, and the general populace not even knowing about that, or even giving a shit upon being told about it.
Sometimes deleting a tweet just once is not enough.
This is a dirty one. Two NYT journalists write a "news analysis" piece on Kavanaugh trying to promote a book they wrote. The contents are old rehashed allegations of sexual misconduct, with one exception: an accusation that Kavanaugh's penis touched a female student's hand.
Two days after the article was published, they quietly add a note that the supposed victim declined to be interviewed and her friends do not remember the incident.
Here's the kicker: this exculpatory information comes from the book that the authors of this article wrote. Why didn't they include the text that debunks the only new piece of news they had in the first published version of the article?
When I was 2
Sometimes the news are too fake.
> i can blame 9/11 on airplanes
> dude no way
> watch me
He actually did it the absolute mad lad.
> our reporters need to write more about divisions in this country
> goddammit trump, stop dividing this country
Which number is that, please? Or do you happen to know its title?
Sometimes CNN debunks the NYT.
when they started to glorify everything the government and its leaders do
That the dork from that 'walmart' themed show my gf watches?
Sometimes CNN debunks the NYT, part two.
I'll ask your gf tonight.
Media corporations were sued in whatever your high court is called. It was ruled that there is no contract between media companies and the public to tell truth. They are not bound to tell you the truth. Hell, they are not even compelled to tell the truth. What were you expecting?
> attacker yells "allahu akbar"
> uhh... really hard to say... maybe he was pissed about the lack of female CEOs in top companies
remix?
youtu.be
When I was like 12 and started thinking rationally?
Trump supporters watch in private a video of Trump killing members of the media: bad
A theater has a publicly shown play where Trumpius Caesar is assassinated: good
Notice the second author: Maggie Haberman. Good 'ol Maggie.
> Italian driver
What did they mean by this?