There is no point in trying to fight the majority of conservatives that are starting to wake up to the Jewish subversion. It is completely counterproductive to make fun of people who are fair and reasonable enough to support alternative right-wing thought.
However it is quite clear that the Jewish origin of their religion will ultimate be their pitfall, though it doesn't have to be. Main elements are >Absolutely supreme God who is similar to any pagan sun God >Celebration of the solar cycle and ancient mysteries >Belief in an eternal afterlife for the virtuous and hell for the evildoers >Safety net for the robbed, widowed and persecuted, orphans and sick people How does any of that depend on Jewish scripture? It doesn't and we don't even have to rewrite the bible to fit it modern circumstances. For example: >Amos 9:7 >"Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the Lord. Have not I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt? and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir?" >Faithful centurion of Luke 7:1-10 >"When Jesus heard these things, he marveled at him, and turning to the crowd that followed him, said, “I tell you, not even in Israel have I found such faith.” >Jews are children of Satan, John 8:38-44 >"I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father" >"They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham." >"But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham." >Revelations 2:9 and 3:9 >"Synagogue of Satan" >"Men who say they are jews but aren't [children of Abraham]"
There are enough bible references available that justify a purely antisemitic perspective on the gospel.
>Christianity comes from Judaism Its actually the other way around. Back in the day there was no Judaism, just the faith of Abraham and later the Israelites. At the time Jesus came there were 3 main sects, The Essenes (The only ones native to Judeah), the Sadduccess and the Pharisee (both being not native to Judeah). The Pharisee are the Edomites (descendent of Amalek which the Israelites were told to genocide and which descent from the Canaanites which worshipped Moloch and such) which previously were forced to convert. However they really liked their old customs which were unlawful and thus they created the Oral Law. You know how in Court a Jew will use semantics, grey areas, loopholes and other pilpul to argue they didnt break a law which they never followed completly ignoring the intent behind the law? The Oral Law of the Pharisee is a guideline on how to do that with the OT Law. This is the group of people pretty much all quarrels Jesus had was with and they were constantly rebuked for this by him, God himself, for being hypocrites, a brood of Vipers, even the children of the devil. Even their name describes them seperating themselves from the original en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees >"Pharisee" is derived from Ancient Greek Pharisaios (Φαρισαῖος),[8] from Aramaic Pərīšā (Hebrew: פְּרִישָׁא), plural Pərīšayyā (Hebrew: פְּרִישַׁיָּא), meaning "set apart, separated" So by all means the Pharisee splitted themselves off from the original faith which became known and was continued through Christianity and thus by all practical means was Pre-Christ-Christianity.
This Oral Law of the Pharisee then after a few 100 years got written down in the (Babylonian) Talmud starting what is now known as Judaism. So its not that Christianity is based on Judaism, but that Judaism is a collection of blasphemies and herasies of Christianity.
>God You haven't even figured it out. You are misappropriating the name of God and giving it to the Jew-god Yahweh. Godan ( God ) is the chief god among many others in the polytheistic Germanic pantheon. God is not a title, it is the Lombardic name of Godan, or more commonly, Wodan. God is named after the Germanic god Wodan ( ᚹᛟᛞᚨᚾ ) and the Norse allfather of the gods, Oðinn. There are other examples of the g
Adam Gonzalez
yet we use the term "god" as a title. We have various beings around we call gods, not only Odin. Words change meaning over time, and this changed into becoming a title. Just like Elohim, El Elyon, Baal, Melek/Melech, etc. are, all titles/desgination to designate power, ruleship or highness. and "god" became such a term over time. Noone when saying "God" thinks of odin except you retarded memeflags.
The sun god doesn't differentiate people according to their ethnicities. It makes sense to practice your own ethnic religion, D&C tactics shouldn't be applied however.
Cameron Brooks
>Its actually the other way around Yes but it's easier to just follow what I've wrote. You can't convince people to become Christians, however it's possible for them to comprehend reasons why they shouldn't be hostile but transformative.
Brody Phillips
>Judeo-Christian Funny how that word doesn't apply to the Holocaust
If you dont approach it with the truth you may as well drop the effort entirely. if you try to pilpul and bend the gospel you just sow more confusion and play right into the kikes hands.
James Reed
wrong kikes are not israelites nor semites but the Edomites that lived in judeah en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom >The Edomites first established a kingdom ("Edom") in the southern area of modern Jordan and later migrated into southern parts of the Kingdom of Judah ("Idumea", or modern southern Israel/Negev) Eventually they were forced to convert >They were again subdued by John Hyrcanus (c. 125 BC), who forcibly converted them, among others, to Judaism
And around that same time the Pharisee that follow the oral law come around en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees >The Pharisees preserved the Pharisaical oral law in the form of the Talmud like we have today the kikes follow the Tal Mud and which was repeatedly rebuked by Jesus, telling them they are children of Satan.
Now Edomites are the descendents of Essau, the brother of Jacob/Israel who decided to wage war his brother and his people. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edom >The Hebrew word Edom means "red", and is derived from the name of its founder Esau
Now to do this Essau joined Amalek en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amalek >According to the Bible, Amalek was the son of Eliphaz (himself the son of Esau, ancestor of the Edomites)
Which thus, together with Essau became the Edomites (plus a couple other things mixed in likely). The Amalek are known as Israels nemesis and who fits the whites nemesis better than the kikes? The Amalek are a canaanite tribe. Canaan is the son of Ham who was one of the three sons of Noah (Abraham coming from Shem, S(h)emites). Now the Hamites are traditionally black and indeed canaans curse hints to him becoming a slave like the blacks did. Furthermore i believe the biblical first black (can go into this) was Cain, who himself was the son of Eve and the serpent. This is the line of kikes, those that say they are jews, but are liars instead. The Synagogue of Satan and they came through the Hamitic line, thus are basically white skinned niggers
from Flavius Josephus documentacatholicaomnia.eu/03d/0037-0103,_Flavius_Josephus,_De_Bello_Judaico,_EN.pdf >2. For there are three philosophical sects among the Jews. The followers of the first of which are the Pharisees; of the second, the Sadducees; and the third sect, which pretends to a severer discipline, are called Essens. These last are Jews by birth, and seem to have a greater affection for one another than the other sects have.
so the closest relation the kikes have to the israelites is through Esau who mixed himself into the canaanites
Esau originally had the birthright to take over the tribe as a first born. However after a day of work on the field he went inside and asked his brother for something to drink or eat, for which Jacob demanded Esaus birthright. Esau agreed, and thus got what he wanted and Jacob got the birthright from Esau. However after this Esau wanted it back, Jacob didnt want to return it, and thus Esau parted from his family, joined a canaanite tribe that became known as Amalek (the Israelites nemesis) to wage war on Jacob/Israel. These eventually (likely with a couple others mixed into) became the Edomites which are todays Kikes. And to this day they still demand the birthright back from Israel (The white man). Their hate of whites is actually envy, they want what we have. Thats why they undergo plastic surgery to appear more european, take on germanic last names and yiddish is even just some fake german. They try to genocide whites so that they can take their position of chosen people they believe they inherited from Esau, without anyone else being left to rightfully claim that position.
Other than the kikes however Esau made up with Jacob/Israel again eventually, but (((they))) refuse to follow the lead to this day.
>Dejudaizing Christianity Christ was a circumcised Torah reading Passover celebrating rabbi. How the fuck do you "dejudaize" that? Look, this lying scumnag here too
Aaron Sanders
What are you trying to achieve by larping as a Jew?
Jace Bennett
its already bend when saying it has a jewish origin. Its further bend by implying modern kikes relate to biblical israelites. The term in the NT translated as "jews" for exampleis Ioudaious, which refers to citizens of the kingdom of Judah, where there were a bunch of different people after the babylonian captivity. You give them legitimacy to claim their faith is the correct/original one while doing these things.
Landon Garcia
>253269984 Why is it only memeflags and EU soicucks who ignore the entire content of the OP? make a factual argument if you want (You)s.
Cooper Miller
Yes faggot, conservatives don't know any of that. The point of this thread was to DEJUDAIZE CHRISTIANITY.
Cooper Rivera
Judaism has nothing to do with Jesus. He clearly fought against their usury and jewry and only took the valid lessons of moses they had turned against
Kevin Thomas
Christianity and Judaism both come from the exact same proto-jewish cult. Christianity is more Jewish than Judaism is. Literally.
Christopher Reyes
lol good luck with that, 1000 years of presence in Europe surrounded by Greco-Roman and Germanic elements were only temporarily and partially able to do so there is no way in hell you are rooting christianity away from hebraism, it's an abrahamitic religion to the core and actual christians throughout the ages never denied this like modern larpers trying to desperately fit it into their nationalistic ideology
Aaron Diaz
Yes, but most conservatives are still completely blind to it. Modern "Christianity" has to be dejudaized to be compatible with antisemitism.
the white race are the actual chosen people, the Israelites. This gets clear already when you see that Mount Aratat, where Noah landed with his arc is the same place where the white people, caucasusoids, come frome from, the Caucasus en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasus de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ararat It is also known that the blue eyed people all have a common anchestor sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130170343.htm Which most likely was Adam or Noah if the timeframe is off
Furthermore the blue eyed white people are known across the world to come around and bring technology and knowledge and rule them for some time like the seed of promise is prophesized to do. The sumerians believed the blue eyed white people where gods, the annunaki (even though i came to believe that the blue eyed possibly are other people during the sumerians, they at least have the blue eyed people and swastika as well). The Aztecs as well, and describe them from coming over the sea with a ship that moved on its own. The chinese talk about blue eyed and blonde haired people who created a civilization and ruled for some time. A lot of egyptians mummies are shown to have had blonde hair etc. And Europeans were the first in the Americas as well telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9110838/Stone-age-Europeans-were-the-first-to-set-foot-on-North-America.html
Hitlers Ahnenerbe tried to find out about the origins of the white people, and maybe he did find out the actual israelis are the whites with the jews being the blue eyed people, who are said that they will spread across the earth and rule everywhere. Same they did during colonisations. Hitler found out the (((jews))) of today arent the jews of the bible who are just >those who belong to the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews but are liars instead.
The "white privilege" people go on about, is actually the blessing of God
Except there's a fertile soil to antisemitic interpretations of the gospel that has grown fruits throughout the millenia. Without the bible references we would have been as tolerant as Muslims.
Connor Moore
The bible story is actual real history. This gets clear when you look at the story of Joseph alone. Joseph, in the bible, was sold off as slave to egypt, where he became friends with the pharao and married his daughter. He was given authority over everything. Compare that with the Yuya-mummie which was blond by the way. web.archive.org/web/20170319164635/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuya en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_(Genesis)
Hitlers "Herrenrasse" probably was meant to mean "Rasse des Herrn" "Race of the Lord" The 1000 year Reich was meant to be the 1000 year Sabbath, the 7th day which never happened because Satan interrupted it and which is for God like a thousand years. This is why the Nazis had a sense of superiority like the Israelis had for the goyim. The (((Jew))), like everything, stole their identity from others. Just like they took german names, have plastic surgery to look more white, act white when it suits them they stole their whole identity of being a jew from the whites
From the Bible >20 King Arius of the Spartans. >To the high priest Onias. Greetings! >21 It has been discovered in a written record that the Spartans and the Jews are relatives and are both of the family of Abraham. 22 Since we have learned this, please let us know how you are. 23 On our part, we write to let you know that what is yours—your livestock and property—belongs to us, and ours belongs to you. We therefore command that our envoys report to you in keeping with this.
Also truthvids.net/ mentioned a lot of descriptions of what the Israelites are and will be doing, and how it all fits the Europeans
then do it right, remove the jewish influence and return to the origin, the truth, instead of adding falsehoods to negate the previous ones.
Note that hebrew like we know it exist like this like the middle of the 19th century. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_language >Archaic Biblical Hebrew from the 10th to the 6th century BCE, corresponding to the Monarchic Period until the Babylonian Exile and represented by certain texts in the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh), notably the Song of Moses (Exodus 15) and the Song of Deborah (Judges 5). Also called Old Hebrew or Paleo-Hebrew. It was written in the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. A script descended from this, the Samaritan alphabet, is still used by the Samaritans. Originally the bible was written in Paleo-Hebrew.
Pic related, left is Paleo Hebrew and on the right the Vinca Runes found across europe, mainly central and southeast giving a further connection between those en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleo-Hebrew_alphabet en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinča_symbols given a further connection that the real isralites and chosen people are the aryans
piramidasunca.ba/bs/latest-news/item/3495-the-oldest-writing-in-the-world-has-been-decoded.html >(1) O Three-One God of the land of Thrace, >(2) I vow in Truth to bring you all due offerings, O great Son of God, >(3) And only you (shall) I praise (and exalt), O my God (for you are) great! >(4) You who are now in your temple, (I pray, hear me), keep me safe and deliver me (from all evil)! Three one god, the trinity being a theme in the oldest text we have deciphered so far. The trinity is another theme which draws itself across a lot of culture, from sumer to egypt, to the Nordics and of course christianity written in the Vinca Runes, found in Bulgaria (Balkans)
behindthename.com/name/adam >This is the Hebrew word for "man". It could be ultimately derived from Hebrew אדם ('adam) meaning "to be red", referring to the ruddy colour of human skin red, like whites are right after birth or when too long in the sun
A picture commanded to be made of Jesus by Tiberius Ceasar. Appearently a recreation, but still in the Library of Congress so probably accurate loc.gov/pictures/item/90707066/
behindthename.com/name/adam >This is the Hebrew word for "man". It could be ultimately derived from Hebrew אדם ('adam) meaning "to be red", referring to the ruddy colour of human skin red, like whites are right after birth or when too long in the sun
Esau, the twin brother of Jacob, who birthed the Israelites is described as >25The first one came out red, covered with hair like a fur coat; so they named him Esau red hair, a trait usually found in whites mostly. If Esau was white his twinbrother was too.
>7Her dignitaries were brighter than snow, whiter than milk; their bodies were more ruddy than rubies, their appearance like sapphires. 8But now their appearance is blacker than soot; they are not recognized in the streets. Their skin has shriveled on their bones; it has become as dry as a stick So first they were white, then something happened, likely the captivity where they were brought away, and were replaced by dark people.
Making a white version of Christianity has been tried twice: in NatSoc Germany and in the USA by the Christian Identity movement. The former literally had to rewrite the Bible and remove significant portions of it, leaving almost nothing. The latter took a different approach and simply declared whites as the real Hebrews of the Old Testament and modern Jews as the literal children of Satan, whom impregnated Eve.
Pick your poison.
Caleb Adams
>instead of adding falsehoods Read the OP. Again it doesn't add falsehoods.
It's a corner stone to there identity. You present facts about the negative consiquences of it and they deny it. They lie about history. They lie about the destructive effect there philosophy has on the mind. You cannot argue in good faith with the christkikes about there belifes. It's a complete meaningless act.
Aaron Reyes
The issue with Christian Identity is that in practice we are still repeating semitic rituals. This will confuse anyone who identify with their own heritage. Even if CI isn't wrong about migrations, most will just not understand any of it.
