School bullies, violent criminals, and repeat offenders should be forcibly sterilised.
The case for sterilising the latter two is an obvious eugenic action, but questionable morally. But sterilising bullies?
First let's define bullying:
>Bullying is an intentional and repeated act of aggression against a relatively powerless victim
Bullying in childhood is a strong predictor of delinquency, violence, aggressiveness, drug use, impulsivity and psychopathy in adulthood
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Significant correlations were found between bullying and CU (Callou-Unemotional) traits, Narcissism, and Impulsivity
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Meta analysis shows a much higher probability of criminal offending in adult life for bullies, even when controlling for childhood risk factors
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Childhood bullies are ~4 times more likely to engage in intimate-partner violence
jamanetwork.com
Aggression is inversely related to IQ and both traits are relatively stable throughout life
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
All these traits are highly heritable, meaning their population-wide variation has a significant genetic component
semanticscholar.org
Anti social personality traits have more reproductive success. Thus, if bullies are left unchecked, society will experience a dysgenic decline
archive.is
In pruning these undesirable elements from the population gene pool you can create a more stable, intelligent, and thus, eugenic society.
>bet you were bullied in school OP
>eugenics is cruel and evil
Not arguments.
If you disagree, you're a nigger or a cuck
