How do Christians justify the fall of Constantinople?

How do Christians justify the fall of Constantinople?

Attached: Le_siège_de_Constantinople_(1453)_by_Jean_Le_Tavernier_after_1455.jpg (1210x1788, 1.97M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sack_of_Constantinople
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sexually_active_popes
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

fuckers had it coming after latin massacre

It was mostly the Turks who did it. Ya win some, ya lose some.

Constantinople means nothing for Christianity, you should make the same question for Jerusalem being unde jewish control

From a religious standpoint the one thing the Jews at least understood originally in the scriptures is that a nation that represents God can only fall if God allows it or is punishing people that are not teaching his way.

I have no idea how they attempt to explain this away.

>city wholly dedicated to the christian God by the first Christian emperor
>gets ultimately taken and turned into a Turkish (part-time believers) city
Christcucks are gonna say that their army was corrupt or sinful or churn some other coping mechanism as always, even though the whole crusaders' army had more faith in God than the whole world nowadays.
>or is punishing people that are not teaching his way.
Called it lmfao

Attached: cbee9593e74fc48b23b1d9252a8b7c937eee15bb55f7498961b718893cf3e933.png (3000x3000, 620.29K)

King Alphonse of Aragon was busy

Attached: 861A795A-747F-4D07-8828-B21A2E93D486.jpg (1024x1363, 367.85K)

Based Mehmet and superior strategy

Reconquista when?

God liked the Muslims more