Nationalism, we can all agree, has been a tool that defines the current landscape of the right, but this was not always the case. It was once very much a left-wing prospect that caused much damage to the right leading to the end of many right-leaning institutions such as monarchies and the decline of the church(this isn't a religious thread keep on topic).
Since Nationalism is their old toy set, it isn't hard to believe that they can easily cut us off at the knees. Now I don't expect us to reinvent the wheel in this thread, but I'm interested in exploring not cucked alternatives(aka globalism and patriotism).
The only example I can think of is feudalism, the practice that was replaced by nationalism, where loyalty was to a bloodline/crown/person/hierarchy.
Thoughts?
Should we go beyond Nationalism and where to?
National----->Socialism
:^)
The end goal is neo-fedual eco-nationalist monarchy. Just fucking imagine techno knights crusading through wild, untended forests and traditional architecture melded with nature.
Statistically speaking, nobody here would be intelligent or lucky enough to be born into the techno-knight class and we'd likely end up indentured servants. I prefer meritocracy where I can move around and do whatever I want.
Then just be a free man.
Meritocracy is only possible in a feudal/caste-based system. Everyone is born to their genetic strengths and, when it comes down to it, exceptional individuals can raise their station easily in a feudal system through participation in the clergy or by way of their raw abilities. Western civilization today, however, is not a meritocracy due to the social strains caused by diversity and the mass uplifting of unworthy individuals who'd better serve themselves and society in the class they were born to. Affirmative action and globalist ideology has essentially destroyed meritocracy and replaced it with brown people excluding Europeans in our own countries.
To the stars user, the worlds outside of here are waiting for us to conquer them
>checked
The idea leaving a part of the world open to explore or at least in a completely anarchiac situation that would allow for a feudalist society to rise like say Stalker, would be great but we'd need to control the rest of the planet or else kikes would hide out there and use criminals and fugitives there to overthrow the rest of the world
>nobody here would be intelligent
Should have just stopped there, every flag in this thread is American.
Well, Mr. Big Brain meme flagger, what do you think of the topic? Should we go beyond nationalism and to what?
Based as fuck
You're all idiots.
The logical step above nationalism is supra-nationalism. But not an 'inter'national supra-nationalism with alien states and their alien populations coordinating state apparatuses, it would an 'intra'national supra-nationalism whereby the coordination goes between a singular population (a singular race) living on various continent. This involves using nationalism as a stepping stone not towards global colonization like that past (which leaves slaves and survivors) but towards global conquest (which leaves no slaves or survivors) and propagates the conqueror.
*mistakes
The logical step above nationalism is supra-nationalism. But not an 'inter'national supra-nationalism with alien states and their alien populations coordinating state apparatuses, it would be an 'intra'national supra-nationalism whereby the coordination goes between a singular population (a singular race) living on various continents. This involves using nationalism as a stepping stone, but not towards global colonization like that past (which leaves slaves and survivors), instead towards global conquest (which leaves no slaves or survivors) and thus propagates the conqueror.
The obiouvs solution after nationalism (before was religion) is a way of mindset thinkijg. if people think like you it doesnt matter if their muslim or black, if you talekd to them behind ascreen you would like them,same can be said for real life Pol is too focused of religion and race but ifear Yas Forums is becoming like boomers in a way, and what way is ignorgance we no longer live in the world of 1300 or 1939 anymore we aarea more interconnected societ used to seeing differing people an thei thinking is what makes you connect with them, their values, their morals, their beleifs, etc stop being retarded pol fuckig dumbassses
>their values, their morals, their beleifs,
"And by the way, I don't give a good damn about the so-called "browning of America." Color doesn't matter. Ideology does."
- Ben Shapiro
What you're describing is basically patriotism, get out of here with that cuck shit.
patriarchal feudalism is the only way to go
pleb must be kept away from important shit
those who rule must be ready to fight and die first against various threats
low taxes
>every tolerant person tolerance ends when he has to deal with subhuman himself.
also jews must pay for their crimes
I agree with that quote. a mindset can bring people closer together than religion or race ever could.
wtf are u talking about u dumb fuck patroistsm has nothing to do witha mindest u fucking retard imt alking about absicas koral values here an way of thinking u think ur funny u fucking dumbass?
your genuinely retarded theirs no help fro u boomer, your basically a 1939 boomerb in the modern age u dumb fuck learn when society progresess dumb shit
Mutually respectful anarchist-utopia where each individual is their own philosopher-king and can roam freely on a green Earth. This privilege of true self-governance is only granted to individuals that have rigorously self-studied philosophy and can demonstrate high moral intelligence.
All other individuals would live in large city-states (and the surrounding countryside) or on off world colonies, but would not be permitted to settle elsewhere. Their system of governance would be akin to Starship Troopers, with citizenship being attainable only thru service towards society (everyone has basic human rights, you just need citizenship to affect any societal change, then later transcending society to become a self-governed entity).
We know you agree with the quote. There's no debating it. That's why we've pointed it out for others to see.
reading all u said makes me think ur a fucking narcissct and ur idea is very retareded. ur so braindead and u fall into the same category as wishful thinking idealogies that can never be realistically achievehd stfu faggot
and its a true quote we aint in medieaval tiems anymore so we dont fght giant wars over religion. were not in 20th century anymore so we dont fight over race. the next giant war will be fought over political midnest not religion or race. the sooner you realise the world your in, the better.
Someone is not familiar with Orwell's other books.
Looks like you're fighting a war with the English language. Keep telling yourself whatever you're saying.
Well you've got a lot of sweeping up to do before you can implement any kind of Nationalism, or Nu-Nationalism.
Study the citizen system of the Eastern Roman Empire aka Byzantium. Whereas in the West people were serfs and slaves to the villains in the villa, feudalism, Romans in the east were free men and citizens of Rome. Study the history, the difference, and meaning of it. In this context, the French Revolution was, among other things, a victory of the enslaved serfs against the aristocratic elite. Things aren't as one dimensional as they are taught in school, we (should) all know that. Also true, Jews entered the political stage after the French Revolution. Again, things aren't black and white.
desu ik im right and you'll realise what the modern world has evovled too, when the time comes.
I've realized what it's devolved too. And it's stopping in its tracks while plebs like yourself seethe about it.
learn to speak english kike
Hebrew does get in the way of things, lots of spitting and coughing up words. Rubs off on other languages.
Careful, don't let yourself be lured and misguided by false teachings of resident catholics. They swear allegiance to feudalism due to the history of their church, but careful studying of Christian history reveals that it was the Western warlords and the Western Church who created this unholy union of state power and church power to enslave the populace. Meanwhile in the Eastern Roman Empire, Romans remained FREE and were NOT SLAVES.
To clarify, this thread isn't about what to change nationalism into after victory, but a search for alternatives that can be sought after now and in the future.
They also weren't white. Let them have their inferior system of governance.
A very ignorant comment. The race does not matter at all in this discussion about government systems. Are you intentionally stupid? Would you prefer being a slave because your ancestors were slaves? If you do think this way, perhaps you deserve to be enslaved.
Thje answer is a mummy state that looks after the citizens and punishes the communtiy of any crime doers. this will create an enviroment of behaving as ur actions can affect hundreeds off other people in ur area.
Australian Limism.
It speaks volumes about the present intelligence that you have to clarify the topic after a lengthy opening post. People on average are NOT smart, and that won't be different on Yas Forums or anywhere else where masses are involved.
>Would you prefer being a slave because your ancestors were slaves
My ancestors were Templar Knights and noblemen. I wouldn't mind being a peasant farmer if it came down to it today, but I don't think that's how the new system would shake out.
Bong the adults are talking about non-cuck alternatives to the Nationalism, Globalism dichotomy.
The more into the future we go as technology advaances and way of living improves, the more our society becomers cucked thats just how it is dude. unless we devlove back into the stone ag and start over :)
True, but I was also probably just unclear. I am a terrible writer, after all.