Was Saul aka "Paul" the anti-Christ?

Hi Logo

Jesus brother expelled Saul for Jerusalem and had many conflicts

Wouldn't James know better than Paul? IHe spent a lot more time with Jesus

modren christens are almost all paulists, not Jesus followers. Paul said a bunch of stuff Jesus never said in any Gospel. Jesus was basically a hippy Christian that told you to give your stuff away and live in communes with other Christians. Jesus spoke about love and forgiveness 10 times as often as judgement.
Its interesting, in a lot of Religions;
you will find it was started by an ideas man, a hippy pure love guy.
After he goes, the the second guy in charge is the tough nails organizer and rules enforcer

Attached: 1582144840381.gif (960x640, 90.93K)

off topic faggot

Attached: hoser-take_me_to_church.jpg (276x182, 6.15K)

faggot

Attached: 01-alex-bischoff-feb-2018.jpg (750x750, 71.23K)

Cringe

faggot

Attached: 6bLz-xgtvlBtt_0DbFnkjEF1YtovrCh9WXqdJcdbbuE.jpg (236x314, 15.68K)

>hurrdurr religion isnt a huge force in politics domestically and cause of conflicts todayy.
not suprsaed you are American posters

No, John was
John, James, and Peter were the actual Apostles -- and they rejected Paul
James excommunicated him

>having these pics on pc

Yeah, all those "holy men" and "church fathers" were Paul-followers, though, so...
His actual teachings are diametrically opposed to the teachings of Christ
Hence, he is anti-Christ

Yes, he was one of many antichrist, A literal interloper. This nigger is a Paulite smol brain

Don't expect most "Christians" to know this. Spoonfed low IQ Paulite garbage is all they're capable of processing and is the bulk of what their shit tier pastors/priests will teach them.

>Paul-followers
Are you on drugs? Show me one (1) early church movement that rejected the writings of Paul. Not even the Arians did it.

Stop spouting opinions about stuff you know nothing about.

He did say that he was trying to "unite the body of Christ". Jesus said he didn't come to unite, but divide. The whole thing is weird.

>John, James, and Peter were the actual Apostles -- and they rejected Paul
You're free to post proof of that instead of acting like it makes any sense that everyone accepted Paul, he is not denounced as a heretic in any capacity unlike some other characters named in the New Testament, and how Peter expressly acknowledges Paul as a fellow teacher.
>James excommunicated him
Post proof. Go on.

Their were twelve apostles. One was a representative of the devil.

When he died a new apostle was chosen to replace the devils representative.

Thats all im saying

St. Paul was not one of the twelve.

That’s true have a you

Nah, he was just an enterprising kikel who turned Christianity from a cult for Jews into a cult for goyim.

He replaced judas.

lines up with some of the prophecy but not all of it

Read the bible. Peter says pual is tricking people and leading them to hell

kys

The Nazarenes, and the first generation of Christians, who came before Saul, and who Saul bragged about persecuting -- in his own writings

Saint Matthias replaced Judas the Iscariot.

?

Your gonna give that guy conniptions. Hes a true believer.

>This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc.
faggot
quit shitting up this board with your jew faggotry and your nigger logic to justify it. faggot

Attached: 622c40e937100f242619671e90e84602.jpg (288x349, 16.67K)

Paul is a goon and he's burning in hell

RABBI YESHUA the Meshiac

>Jezues Christos?

Attached: jesus paul jews.jpg (960x771, 118.24K)

Oh, I see now. You're trolling. St. Paul, known as Saul before his conversion, a member of the Sanhedrin and a prince of the Jews, a renown persecutor of Christians, persecuted Christians before his road to Damascus. It amuses you to feign mental retardation, it seems.

Nah, I just don't think he ever really converted
He came up with a clever trick to subvert the message of Christ
The ultimate "fellow goyim"
Prince of the Jews indeed

No hes right.

You may have read the bible but you didnt understand it. Paulian Christianity is not the same as the christianity espoused by the original christians. In fact much of their writing is dedicated to refuting pualian heresy.

Prove it

Paul was tortured and sentenced to death for his "clever tricks", and never did he recant. Quite a lot of dedication for someone who is supposedly only dabbing on the goyim. But have it your way, you either subscribe to novel theology that is wholly illogical or this is just you having fun by playing retarded.

You are free to point out the early church sources rejecting St. Paul. Surely they must exist if he is so self-evidently wrong and heretical. Go on.

Youre a jehovas witness. You believe heresy like water and argue over banality. Was it a torture stake instead of a cross?!?!?

You are asking all the wrong questions friend.

The question you should ask is how many ways are there to interperet the bible, and why am I following one of the least sensible?

You are trapped in a recursive thought loop. Add more weight to your shelf until the cognitive dissonance drives you mad

Im not your enemy.

Its literally the new testament excluding the gospels.

Of course it is, user.

Read it.