Why does Yas Forums have an issue with LGB people?

There is a big difference between a faggot and a member of the LGB community (T doesn't belong in LGB). I agree with trumps policies, I've taken the 'red pill', I don't practise degenerate behaviour, I don't announce my sexuality because it's no ones damn business, I want to be happily married and have my own children (via surrogate) and I hate most members of the LGB"T" community because they are full on FAGGOTS.

But because I'm a turd burgler or something, I'm a degenerate and should be hanged.

What possible path of logic do you follow to get to such a stupid conclusion? Real answers please and not "muh degeneracy" or "muh destroying the family" because both are retarded and easily debunked.

Attached: 1569609849533.png (1442x690, 97.19K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.org/details/AfterTheBallHowAmericaWillConquerItsFearHatredOfGaysInThe90s/mode/2up
libgen.is/search.php?req=After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred of Gays in the 90s&lg_topic=libgen&open=0&view=simple&res=25&phrase=1&column=def
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Please debunk how mainstream acceptance of alternative sexualities weakens the institution of nuclear family

They are all going to the same place.

Attached: 1537240611569.jpg (600x499, 46.97K)

Encouriging children to be gay is disgusting and can damage the family and society, but that's not my point.

My point is; how is people embracing their sexuality and being with a same sex partner (Because anything else is forced and will end in tradegy) damaging to the family structure when these people are by majority not having families.

>There is a big difference between a faggot and a member of the LGB community
No, there isn't.
> (T doesn't belong in LGB)
yes, it does
>I agree with trumps policies
That's retarded
>I've taken the redpill
Clearly, you haven't
>I don't practise degenerate behaviour
You fuck men in the ass
> I don't announce my sexuality because it's no ones damn business
Good
> I want to be happily married
No
> and have my own children (via surrogate)
NO!
> I hate most members of the LGB"T" community because they are full on FAGGOTS.
so are you
>But because I'm a turd burgler or something, I'm a degenerate and should be hanged.
Yes.
>not "muh degeneracy"
but that's entirely valid
>not muh destroying the family
also totally valid

You provide literally nothing beneficial to society, you should consider it a great mercy that we would even allow you to exist if you kept your faggotry hidden well enough. You are an evolutionary error, a mistake. The idea that you should have the "right" to get married and enjoy tax benefits is laughable, and the idea that you should have the "right" to adopt a child is beyond absurd. Here is our offer, keep your faggotry hidden enough that nobody can notice, and you will be left alone. We don't have the time to waste nor the inclination to hunt the closeted ones down.

Attached: de15df26e9bf61c4f5672a08dc60a50b.jpg (499x481, 27.94K)

"embracing one's sexuality" is a jew meme. sex is for procreation. end of story. ppl who use contraceptives are degenerate in the most literal plain sense. if you're gay, official stance is have no sex. not have gay sex. have no sex, accept your disease like a quadriplegic would, and continue with life being good. Don't be bad by being degenerate. it's extremely simple. any other workaround is mental gymnastics.

How does encouraging children to be gay damage the family and society?

You are gonning to be crucifixied

Because they should be stoned
Leviticus 20:13
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Attached: __original_drawn_by_kiitos__sample-cdf539dc821ef2623c5c09899de0c43e.jpg (850x971, 246.11K)

..why is it called 'LGBT' and not 'BGLT' in alphabetical order?

Sexual preferences should not represent who a person is, nor it should be a bargaining chip to get a job or have parades. Liking dick in your ass should not be protected by law. Groomer

>not "muh degeneracy" or "muh destroying the family" because both are retarded and easily debunked.
But it's true you literal faggot.

That is not an argument and all you've done is avoid the question.

Answer this: If your answer is no sex, why is it your business who I'm having consenual sex with?

The face of Yas Forums. Your one line rebuttals are not working. My biggest issue with ameriturds like you is that you rant on about what is benificial for society, yet you are sweating on Yas Forums using up other peoples electric (Because you obviously don't live on your own) living parasitically off the government or paying your own taxes in to landwhales to get BBC on tinder. Get fucked nigger.

kool

Fake christcucks OUT

No americans are allowed to answer because every american answer is stupid as fuck. The whole world laughs at the USA.

Attached: 1551633567032.jpg (1000x1000, 130.7K)

>Encouriging children to be gay is disgusting
>how is people embracing their sexuality and being with a same sex partner damaging
That's the same fucking thing.

I agree with you completely but laws should exist that protect marginalised groups (I.E no lynching gays because muh dik)

Because LGBT is dumb

Burger education at its absolute finest. Being comfortable with your sexuality = encouraging children to be gay? Neck yourself you absolute mongoloid.

Attached: 1572776528391.png (1200x1200, 53.81K)

>why is it your business who I'm having consenual sex with?
Because the faggot community which yourself lament arises from allowing faggots to do what they want.

Bro, you're a faggot, REPENT!

Wrong. I believe when society seen a shift on its views on homosexuality, it started to be praised and glofiried in our culture. You can thank the (((media))) for that, mostly in america btw :)

Gay people were having buttsex years before you were born even if it was in secret.

>Being comfortable with your sexuality = encouraging children to be gay?
Yes, nigger. If someone has homosexual inclinations, they should be denied, just like temptation or violent ideation.

>t.

Attached: 1576330225720.jpg (750x660, 242.69K)

I only busted cheeks when I was on the inside I ain't no DL nigga

Kill all faggots.
Sage

>what is 2 + 2????
>DON'T TELL ME 4 DAMN IT AHHHHH DUMB AMERICANS

Attached: goaway.gif (423x234, 1.69M)

>Being comfortable with your sexuality = encouraging children to be gay? Neck yourself you absolute mongoloid.
Explain the difference

I dont have a problem with LGB people except that every LGB i have met has been a mean resentful paranoid backstabber. I used to love a super pretty and funny lesbian and she would insult me for no reason.

Nah, being with a man is fucking awesome. None of that nagging woman bullshit eyeing up BBC around the streets. I'll stay in my lane, but have fun with your streetwalking slags.

It's not an inclination because people do not choose to be gay. If you believe anything different you're an idiot or have never met a gay person who isn't a queer.

Saved

Your sunny D is on the counter fat cunt.

>Kill all faggots
>Wouldn't call someone a faggot/nigger to their face because they would get BATTERED

Attached: 1579451792227.jpg (575x1024, 119.65K)

Glorification of faggotry in the media was the means by which we reached a level of tolerance among the general public. They are inextricably linked. You are right that we can't get rid of homosexuality entirely, but we can banish back to the shadows to be practiced in secret, where it will harm less children and do less damage to the birth rates.

You do get a lot of absolute bitchiness shite in the movement. I think it's because a lot of LGB are very feminine (raised by single mothers; a pattern is emerging) and feminine people are more likely to be bitchy. I've never met a gay bloke who just keeps to himself.

People don't choose to be tempted either, retard. We DO choose whether to act on our negative inclinations.

But no, most gay people are not born gay. It's a pathological meme, transmitted by sexual abuse during childhood or adolescence.

There are already paws against murder you fucking mongrel. SEXUAL KINKS SHOULD NOT REPRESENT A PERSONS STATUS IN SOCIETY NOR HAVE SPECIAL PRIVILEGES.

Don't pretend you give a shit about 'birth rates' or the 'white race' you mongoloid when you're 200 pounds and sweating on Yas Forums. Imagine if evolution was the other way around and 'straight' people were told that LOL

This has never been proven and is based on correlational evidence, although that's not to say it doesn't hold any merit. I wasn't raped during my childhood and none of the other LGB people I knew were either, although the most common factor with all of them was dysfunctional fathers. Still a stupid argument with no evidence. How would you even know anyway retard.

People should not be discriminated against becaues of their sexuality (Unless they act like prouncing faggots in which case a beating will suffice). Wouln't expect a dirty cartel nigger to understand.

No people are born gay. It doesn't even make any sense. You know what does make sense? A government funded campaign against a normal healthy society.

archive.org/details/AfterTheBallHowAmericaWillConquerItsFearHatredOfGaysInThe90s/mode/2up
libgen.is/search.php?req=After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred of Gays in the 90s&lg_topic=libgen&open=0&view=simple&res=25&phrase=1&column=def

That book was written by two pro-faggot Harvard professors back in the 80s. It is literally the homosexual agenda playbook.

Attached: AfterTheBallp227.png (1046x804, 960.62K)

Look at what the faggots did to leftism. If you let faggots join your club, your club becomes about faggotry

Also surrogacy is disgusting. Buying children (you promise not to fuck) is unnatural.

I understand you want special privileges, and dot understand there are laws already againts any kind of discrimination, you dont need special laws because you love sucking dick, if you disnt flaunt it like its 100% your personality people wouldn’t be disgusted with faggots like you. But how would a faggot who only thinks in sucking dick and sticking bbc in their ass to understand that people dont like that ahit shoved in their faces, and leave their fucking children alone. Imts not your fucking decision how anybody raises their child, GROOMER.

Are you kidding me?
25% of Yas Forums is gay.

>People should not be discriminated against because of their sexuality
Why not? What if the person is sexually attracted to children and animals? There is absolutely nothing wrong with discrimination.

Attached: 1533921778996.jpg (1517x1410, 425.81K)

>Imagine if evolution was the other way around and 'straight' people were told that LOL
That's the most stupid fucking point you've tried to make yet. The whole point is that your behavior is aberrant.
>This has never been proven and is based on correlational evidence
Correlation is not proof of causation but it is evidence for causation. And the fact is that half of homosexual men report having had sexual contact with an adult man while they were a minor. This often isn't described by the victim as rape or abuse, likely as a coping mechanism.

But regardless of that, the notion that sexual preference is inborn and static is ridiculous. Any preference can change, that's how the Mere Exposure Effect works.
>People should not be discriminated against becaues of their sexuality
Correct, but they should be discriminated against because of their sexual behavior.

I can't claim to speak for this mythical hive mind you call Yas Forums, but I don't care one way or the other. You can do whatever you want as long as you aren't propagandizing people and sexually assaulting others in public.

Attached: chen.png (300x300, 30.02K)

There is no difference between an outspoken faggot and a shy faggot, both want to corrupt society and reproduce through child abuse

Why are you asking opinions from degenerates who call others degenerates? Your desire for approval from this community should prompt you to reflect on why that is. The majority of people on this website are not people worth consideration.