Tell me how Jesus was not a Yid

Someone please tell me if he was a jew or not. Need hot takes

Attached: images (16).jpg (586x524, 53.53K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9byGZC2uc10
codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=37
codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=40&chapter=4&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0
codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=38&chapter=15&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0
codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=14&chapter=61&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0
biblehub.com/interlinear/galatians/4-14.htm
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I dont know what a yid or any yid ,
But I know Jesus Christ .
Because the truth prevail .

based leaf

How do you get to know him

Christ is the Logos. He’s not reducible to categories like race. When He walked in the flesh, his body was that of an Israelite. Israelites were white Aryans before the invasion of the Neanderthals who today falsely call themselves “Jews.”

Religiously? No. The jews of the time and of today both reject his beliefs.
Racial? No, because jews are not a race.

>Neanderthals invaded Israel some 2000 years ago
You mean to suggest the Romans where Neanderthals?

A must watch:

youtube.com/watch?v=9byGZC2uc10

Attached: jesus jews.jpg (2060x2883, 1017.45K)

The bible is quite clear, there is no confusion.
All you have to do is read it.
But christians refuse to do that.

Attached: Jewsus1_highlights.png (1200x800, 311.89K)

Attached: 4257.jpg (650x600, 85.87K)

But I'm a JEW, I'm a Hebreeeeeeeeew, what the hell am I doin' here? I don't belong here.

Attached: 1586472795010.png (1054x526, 83.84K)

He was Aryan

Attached: photo_2020-01-18_19-54-03.jpg (1280x1280, 317.44K)

Read the gospels. His words are powerful. The day he entered Jerusalem, on Palm Sunday hailed as the messiah, he went directly to the temple and flipped the Jewish tables because of their usury and his hatred for their profiting off of God. He was too based for this world. That’s why they killed him.

That’s right

Jesus, according to Paul, the first Christian scripturalist, was an archangel who never set foot on Earth.

So if you want to take Paul's word for it, Jesus was not a Hebrew, nor an Aryan, nor a Jew. He was a spiritual being of God's unearthly realm.

Since the gospels needed a folk figure to sway the yokels in the hinterlands, the evangelists made up a bunch of stories about a human. First he was a follower of the Baptist who graduated later. Then he got a pagan style virgin mother. Then he was further promoted to the Logos (whatever that means) after the world did not end like Mark said he said it would.

Before Paul, there is no Jesus. So, no. Jesus was a celestial being, with no human substance at all.

Roman Judea had a three class structure like any society. The civil authorities, the religious authorities, and the common people. Each class followed a distinct sect of Judaism. These were called the Saducees, the Pharisees, and Essenes. Jesus, a carpenter, was an Essene. After the Romans destroyed Judea, the Saducees died out, the Essenes became the first followers of Christ and assimilated into Roman society, and the Pharisees were scattered into the Jewish Diaspora which created Talmudic Judaism. The people who call themselves Jews today trace their lineage through the Pharisees.

Have any more sources on that subject? I've been exploring alternative interpretations of Christianity for a while now and this one is new to me. Ironically enough the "biblical Israelites were aryan" angle seems to hold the most water so far from everything I've been able to find and confirm myself.

>A Rabbinical quip about complicated scripture requiring an architect to explain it became the trade vocation of the peasant messiah.

>Is this not the tekton?

>In the context of reading Rabbinical scripture.
>In a synagogue.

Robert Price, GA Wells, Bruno Bauer, Lataster, Litwa, Earl Doherty.

I am remiss to mention Carrier, because he is otherwise a raving lunatic and a very bad person who has damaged scholarship on the question with his antics.

But start with Paul himself. Paul takes it upon himself to mount many theological arguments, most all of which would benefit from quotations from Jesus own pronouncements, but there is not one given. Nor any empty tomb. No parables. No virgin birth ("born of woman" in fact, allegorically, in a lower realm of the heavens). No miracles, and even the Eucharist was given to Paul in a vision, so according to Paul that never happened on Earth either.

The easiest explanation is that he didn't know it because it was all made up later. He was passing along a visionary tradition he picked up in Jerusalem, from the "pillars" who were probably Jews disgusted with the direction of Judaism. The 1st centuries BCE and CE were brimming with messianic expectation, and these visionaries latched onto one who was then made to fulfill the nationalistic predictions of their national diary. In retrospect.

Who are Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John? How was Ananias able to baptize Paul if Paul hadn't wrote his letters to the Christians yet? You're heresy is showing, please stop taking away parts of the bible and adding your own fanservice; Jesus Christ is both Son of Man and Son of God.

Attached: main-image.jpg (1200x861, 255.34K)

Jew is not a race. Jew was the pre-Christian term for anyone who believed on the living God.

>Jesus, according to Paul, the first Christian scripturalist, was an archangel who never set foot on Earth.
Where do you people get this stuff?

Attached: 1562561799793.jpg (673x538, 20.16K)

Mark was a Pauline evangelist, inspired to euhemerize the angel by linking him extensively with the Hebrew prophecies and with Homeric epic. Matthew was a Jew who wanted to claim the angel for Judaism and clean up the hasty and parochial Mark. Luke was a late Pauline who needed to placate Rome by goy-ing up Matthew. John was a fictional creation of the Johannine community who strove to explain why the Parousia had failed to come in the "current generation." - hint, it was the Jews fault.

And btw, since your Greek is current, you might notice the Son of Man is spoken of exclusively in the third person. The Son of Man is not the Earthly Jesus, he is the second come right hand of God. And he isn't anywhere to be seen yet.

From the Sinaiticus, Vaticanus, Bobiensis, Alexandrinus, and the Oxxy papyri.

You know. The New Testament.

Show me the scripture.

Acts is "Luke Version 2 Legendary boogaloo" and is retrojected into the gospels. Nobody takes Acts seriously as history. Not even Tabor and he's the last covert evangelist out there masquerading as a High Critic. Except maybe Ehrman, but I think he's in the tank for the mythicists already, but loves his status and his named chair.

codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=37

codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=40&chapter=4&lid=en&side=r&zoomSlider=0

Says nothing about Jesus being an archangel that never touched earth. What is wrong with you?

He was just a construct.