Was she /ourjew/? What is your stance on objectivism?

Was she /ourjew/? What is your stance on objectivism?

Attached: Rand.jpg (1560x899, 105.89K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=e-VR4qAhJL8
youtube.com/watch?v=S9yphWGtABs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

I love this woman. She described how a meritocracy ought to work.

nietzche for dumb jews.

basically jews make a dumber, more commercial version of everything the goyim make.

Pretty cool

Don't you think that a meritocracy wouldn't work in practice for the same reason communism doesn't work; irrationality, irresponsibility and aggression?

Do not hide behind such superficialities as whether you should or should not give a dime to a beggar. That is not the issue. The issue is whether you do or do not have the right to exist without giving him that dime. The issue is whether you must keep buying your life, dime by dime, from any beggar who might choose to approach you. The issue is whether the need of others is the first mortgage on your life and the moral purpose of your existence. The issue is whether man is to be regarded as a sacrificial animal. Any man of self-esteem will answer: “No.” Altruism says: “Yes.

Built for BWC

Well, to be propaganda (regardless of the topic) works best when it's in entertainment and to keep it afloat it has to be commercially viable = available for intellectual majority = simple. Even fucking Lenin said the cinema was the most important of all arts.

>well to be fair

The moral issue of whether or not you "should" give to the beggar cannot be conflated with the issue of whether or not you should be forced to give to the beggar. Those two are separate.

Ayn Rand transfigured Nietzsche with a thoroughly libertarian view of the mode of action proper to man. You have to remember that Nietzsche was a pagan at heart — he admired conquerors, tyrants, kings and dictators. Ayn Rand rebuffed this view in favor of property rights and peaceable co-operation between men.

No, she is an icon to (ironically) parasitic middle man.
She was a jewess on gibs anyway.

Died a bitter old hypocrite. A thoroughly unhappy and unpleasant woman. She hated where she came from, so she oversteered into hypercapitalism and hyperindividualism. She was an atheist and antiracist. She used amphetamines while screeching at hippies for taking LSD. She just plain sucked as a person, end of story.

She had a nice voice. I like her accent.

And when it comes down to the ,,should'', giving a dime to the homeless is not a prerequisite for individual flourishing

>jewish
>catlady
>worships money
>/ourjew/

hm...

>cucks her husband

checks out, totally /pol

The Japanese economic miracle is known as Japan's record period of economic growth between the post-World War II era to the end of the Cold War. During the economic boom, Japan rapidly became the world's second largest economy (after the United States).
This economic miracle was the result of post-World War II Japan and West Germany benefiting from the Cold War. It occurred chiefly due to the economic interventionism of the Japanese government and partly due to the aid and assistance of the U.S. Marshall Plan.
The distinguishing characteristics of the Japanese economy during the "economic miracle" years included: the cooperation of manufacturers, suppliers, distributors, and banks in closely knit groups called keiretsu; the powerful enterprise unions and shuntō; good relations with government bureaucrats, and the guarantee of lifetime employment (shūshin koyō) in big corporations and highly unionized blue-collar factories.
JEWS FEAR THE SAMURAI.

Attached: 1483677019672.png (1750x1750, 1017.88K)

Right , nietzche for Small-souled shopkeepers. Jews, basically

Absolutely.

Objectivism is a necessary phase that every young man should transit through (in my case almost a decade) on the way to Nationalism.


Watch this video, anons:

youtube.com/watch?v=e-VR4qAhJL8

Terrence Popp is a retired Special Operator with really good insight on a lot of things, from the culture to politics to warfare (and let us face it, they are all related in this day and age).

Attached: women prove yet again that they do know know what they want nor can they think logically or plan ahead.jpg (2204x2913, 1.06M)

She was pretty apparently a honeypot for libertarian types opposed to the New Deal and Jewry in general. I doubt she actually wrote those books. I can believe Austen and the Brontes wrote lugubrious novels about pining after alpha males, but females are not conscious enough to write thousands of pages on abstract themes such as economic justice.

Has anybody investigated her connections? I never bothered because I always thought libertarianism was shallow and gay.

Why was Ayn Rand such a strong supporter of Israel?
At that time, they were extremely socialist, tipping communist (many of their citizens had recently migrated from the Soviet Union after all). Ayn Rand is on record saying that ethnic pride, nationalism, are mental diseases. And yet in spite of all this, she planted her flag in the sand for Israel. Why was that exactly?

Attached: 1466655877551.jpg (236x147, 8.72K)

Because she was a fucking jew, dumbo.

>example of the miracle of the free market entrepreneurs is a fucking railway company
>a fucking rail way company
>a thing that would never have existed without massive state involvement

Her IQ had to be sub 75

youtube.com/watch?v=S9yphWGtABs

Commie faggot, i have a privately owned helicopter waiting for you

objectivism is objectively the worst name for a political ideology

Ok school shooter

Cartoonish

Here i must agree, although materialists are a close second.

good starting basics, but fucked of to egoist neverland.

the genetic/memetic individual ( i and what is next similar to me) is the core of all instincts and survival, based on evolution. the ego is just the focus point between the past and future family.

This makes solidaric behavior valuable.

rand was insane enough for the basic truths she found, but to insane to elaborate on them. she fell back to jewish haggling, instead of the transcendent truth of the inherent value of intekigent life and the resulting morality.

Protip: You can be forced

Because those who benefited with merit would invoke the state to prevent others from succeeding in the same way to keep themselves successful thus corrupting the whole system

How does one go from putting himself first in his life to putting his country first because of national pride and himself second? I don't understand the transition.

They ended it. Today banks only lend to the government or give mortgages.

>individualism for you but not for me

I am always amazed by how many people have a negative opinion of her works without reading them. And the criticisms are all the same. If you want evidence of npc behavior, look at the critics of Ayn Rand.

It was the rationalwiki of its day