Yas Forums BTFO by one infograph

strawman

>Guys! There was a balck scientist!!! So not all nigger are fucking stupid!!! I did it, racism is no more!!!

black and asian are not a race either

reddit

Who cares? Just be racist. Nigger!

how come the colonies degraded so much

That shitpost/image is cringe. I don't need to know anything about Liu Hui the Chinese mathematician to look around me and notice that white people build the best cities and are responsible for inventing and engineering the most impressive things in modern life.

And all that rambling text at the bottom of the image is just weird.
>So explain to me why Indians live in a shithole despite their past achievements?
Because they're stupid.

>ignores text and dismisses it as rambling
Not an argument. This does not refute established science. Racism has no scientific foundation. The right is not sending its best.

Are meds white though?

I'm not a Yas Forumstard by any means (which basically means I only post in legitimate threads related to politics when they pop up once in a blue moon), but we're going a bit far with the "race has no scientific foundation" line of thinking here. If you dropped dead and rotted away to nothing but skeletal remains, we could identify your age, ethnicity, and gender just from examining your bones, so this entire "race is only skin deep" bit is obviously bullshit.

Now, I'm not saying it proves anything positive or negative, but dude... race is in our genes and our genes determine every single thing abut us as people.

we're not talking about nobel prizes though. you can figure out who good mathematicians are without that. the nobel prize committee is thoroughly jewish-biased. They tried their hardest to not give john nash a nobel prize, for example, because of his anti semitism. It's corrupt, and the fact that you bring it up implied you aren't a very deep thinker about these things.

>"Although there are small genetic differences that allow geneticists to trace the global migrations of populations, these variations should not be confused with the belief in discrete races because these variations are considered clines, which are gradients of gene frequencies from one population to another based on geography (Brown and Armelagos 2001)."

These traits that were assumed to be unique to each race, are in fact distributed continuously. The scientific term for this is called 'continuous variation'. Academic consensus has come to the same conclusion that it's more ACCURATE and USEFUL to use study methods that have this in mind, rather than what we previously thought.

>"From the 1960s to the present, advances in science continue to demonstrate that there is more genetic variation within a group socially designated as a race than between so-called groups socially identified as different races (Hunley, Healey, and Long 2009;Lewontin 1974;Livingstone and Dobzhansky 1962;Long, Li, and Healy 2009;Relethford 2009)."

Based and researchpilled

>>ignores text
No I didn't. I picked a line from it, a question, and replied to it. You don't seem very smart or good at holding a conversation.

>Sigmund Freud
>neurologist

Attached: 1465748396758.jpg (258x245, 12.45K)

Your answer was shit.
>indians are stupid
And you acknowledged they weren't in the past. So what happened then?

>And you acknowledged they weren't in the past
No I didn't. They are stupid and they live in a shithole. White people are not stupid and our countries are the best. I'm not sure which part you don't get.

>So why were they the 2nd greatest in mathematics and now they're living in a shithole? Explain.
Because they're stupid.

Youre a nigger and calling you nigger makes me happy. Thats all the reason i need.

You specifically quoted my quote
>so explain to me why Indians live in a shithole despite their past achievements.
and then you said
>because they're stupid
Nothing else. You didn't make a counter argument to the part where they had past achievements, which makes me think you agree with this fact. So why were they the 2nd greatest in mathematics and now they're living in a shithole? Explain.

Jews are only so smart because they suck up goy infant blood, expanding their brain and giving it more wrinkles.

>I could debate every Yas Forumstard here and I could win with ease.

If you could win with ease then you wouldn't have to debate "Yas Forumstard"s.

You cannot win because it's intrinsically beneficial to every race to be racist because it does not harm members of ones own race, only others.

Now, the others might come for you for your racism against them, but that's not tied to racism itself.

Attached: big_chen.png (1536x896, 251.97K)

The fact that you attribute most scientific Interventions to ancient Greeks, who you claim no longer exist, is a fail in and of itself.

Why do they no longer exist?

Is not a race with such scientific achievement no longer existing a fail on all of our parts?

Attached: 5199421B-FF52-4E39-B604-2EA713C61C79.png (500x500, 343.87K)

First off, your bullshit about genes being distributed continuously is bullshit, in that it doesn't negate race as an important signifier of a unique genetic inheritance. Just because many populations overlap as carriers of certain genes does not mean that genes are evenly distributed, which they are not. It does not mean that all genes are present among all races, which they are not. Just witness the genes associated with Neanderthals, for example.

Secondly, you unironically quote what has come to be known as Lewontin's Fallacy. That was debunked long ago and even racial egalitarians had to admit it. Just search it and you'll see, with the top searches being full of disingenuous cunts trying to spin the fact it was a lie but promoting the idea that it doesn't matter cuz 'races don't exist' for... reasons.

Lewontin's Fallacy, that there is more variation within races than between them, was so absurd from the beginning that only retards like you could take it seriously. That conclusion was based on small samples and fell apart when more of the genome was mapped. Yet it was used repeatedly in the bullshit propaganda of the globalists, an an oft-told lie told to teenage students and college students for many years.

Now that you know differently will you start to realize that people professing the irrelevancy of race are anti-scientific ideologues that will lie, shifting from one lie to the next to support their bias?

No, you believed that horseshit because you wanted to. When the propagandists are forced to change their lies you'll believe that as well... because you want to. Then you'll run off to start some other shit thread because you are a fucking retard.

Attached: cl5g7uk6egl31.jpg (600x897, 59.42K)

*sips tea*
>is op, dare I say it, our guy?
>look at this outrageous tweet guys
>Lets team up with niggers
>what do you think of Rogue One? Redpilled?
>look at this reddit post guys
>It doesn't wo-
>Now that the dust has settled...
>mic drop
>change my mind. Protip: you can't
>here's why onions is good for you
>thinks his guns will protect him from drone strikes
>APOLOGIZE RIGHT NOW
>uses memeflag
*sips tea*
>not all niggers
>Miss me yet?
>How can Yas Forums even compete?
>You mad white boy?
>drumfkins
>take this jewish DNA test goys
>Yas Forums BTFO
>not all jews
>well?
>hello fellow white peoole
>BERNIE 2020
*sips tea*
>why is x like this?
>am I white
>whats his/her problem?
>Look at this qt jew
>gays are people
>defend this poor shitskin
>POWERFUL
>Can I get a quick rundown guys?
>random nigger porn
>I am forgotten
>what did he mean by this?
>will x be allowed into the ethnostate?

It's not racist to hate niggers. Niggers brought that upon there self.

>Edwards argued that while Lewontin's statements on variability are correct when examining the frequency of different alleles (variants of a particular gene) at an individuallocus (the location of a particular gene) between individuals, it is nonetheless possible to classify individuals into different racial groups with an accuracy that approaches 100 percent when one takes into account the frequency of the alleles at several loci at the same time. This happens because differences in the frequency of alleles at different loci are correlated across populations—the alleles that are more frequent in a population at two or more loci are correlated when we consider the two populations simultaneously. Or in other words, the frequency of the alleles tends to cluster differently for different populations.
Sure dude, lol

western europeans (not jews) are responsible for like 90 percent of modern science. there's specifically a book about this.

western european geniuses.

I agree with this version of events.

There is every reason to be racist, keep posting your little jewish infographs and keep seething dumb tranny lmao

Attached: Screenshot_20200404-112816_WhatsApp-1.jpg (859x1159, 733.3K)

Basado y rojapillado.

But dude, what about Madhava the Indian mathematician? That totally proves... something?

And explain to me why Tesla is the only Serb I've ever heard of? And explain to me why Nords lived in huts before they started engineering skyscrapers? Checkmate whitey

There's nothing wrong with racism, everyone is racist some degree, it's a perfectly natural human trait and is basically tribalism. Humans will never disregard tribalism, it is an important trait for wanting to carry on your own genes. It is forever ingrained into our genetic code.

NIGGER

Do you realize that the statement you quoted supports the position that Lewontin was wrong? Alleles do indeed cluster differently in the populations we identify as race. It is indeed possible to classify people with near 100% accuracy into their racial group.

Are you really as fucking retarded as you seem?

Also, your stupid graphic is wrong about the ancient Greeks. We know in the ancient Greek population there were blonds and redheads and blue-eyed people, along with brunettes. You can't have these recessive traits in any abundance unless the breeding pool is European enough that the recessive genes can continue to find each other. It's obvious that, though the Greeks and Romans were more brunette than Europeans to the North, they were, in fact European. From what we know about genetics all of Europe is a closely related kin group. The fact that modern Greeks are more mixed with Southern elements doesn't change the genetic kinship that the ancient Greeks had to modern, white Europeans.

Attached: 1503540288943.jpg (2000x1007, 1.39M)

There's not a single african on that list you racist fuck

>Leaf being this triggered about being wrong
You dont have any scientific arguments. I could provide countless links debunking racist talking points. All you could do is call people stupid. You lost. Fuck off, leaf.

everyone remembers the Nords real mansion estates built inside Viking ships

If you say so, bud. I'm not even sure what point you're trying to make. Look around whatever room you're in. White people are the reason that you live comfortably and have nice stuff. I'd be living comfortably even if all non-whites went extinct 10,000 years ago.

>I could provide countless links debunking racist talking points.
There would be no such thing as links if it wasn't for white people.

Present a "racist talking point" we can discuss then, the OP pic is laughable. Even my absolutely peripheral country have white scientist that would qualify ahead of some of these litteral who's. You wanna do the nord in huts thing and compare scandaniavian achiements per capita with that of sub-sahara up until whites made contact? Fuck, I don't even think we'll have to adjust for per capita. Or you wanna do a general race and IQ? Pick one.

I quoted it because it was a stupid fucking argument. That's why i dismissed it with a "lol sure". He literally admitted Lewontin was right when examining the frequency of different alleles among individuals.
>UHHHH B-BUT IF YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THIS OTHER DUMB BULLSHIT L-LIKE GROUPING MULTIPLE LOCI AT THE SAME TIME..THEN I'M RIGHT!
Ok retard. It still doesn't debunk the fact that it's continuous variation, AN ESTABLISHED THING IN BIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY.

So what? Whites still aren't inherently smarter. You have yet to provide a scientific argument other than narrow observations.

Wasn't Einstein's first wife a Serb?

No they don't, you worthless coping paki incel. White scientists always come out on top, those shitskins come nowhere near.

Attached: 87643.jpg (367x550, 54.76K)

>Sigmund Freud
>neurologist

Attached: 1583581091182.jpg (570x587, 30.42K)

Goddamn you are stupid. It's literally called LEWONTIN'S FALLACY. It is a fucking fallacy, you retard. There is NOT more genetic difference within races than between races. It is a well-known LIE. A moment's research will reveal this, and yet you quote someone affirming that it is a lie as if this supports Lewontin's claim!

Jesus, you are fucking dumb.

Also, I stated that continuous variation was bullshit not because it was incorrect, but because it did not negate racial differences, which IT DOES NOT. Overlap is not the same as races being the same, with races easily identified by their genetic markers even if all you have is the genetic code. I mentioned Neanderthals but there are so many examples of this that I can't believe how fucking retarded you are for believing this negates racial categories.

Honestly, you are literally too stupid to be debating this, just dumb enough to be oblivious to how dumb you are.

Attached: 1503540268457.jpg (728x1010, 208.08K)

Yes they are, the world would be overwhelmingly improved if all non-whites were exterminated and you know it.

Attached: 1585946452909.png (594x698, 190.68K)

Don’t see any subsaharan Africans on there OP

>jews arent white
White jews are

based and correct

>lumping Germans with British is like lumping Negroids with Arabs
But that's wrong you fucking retard.

Attached: 1565708926448.png (1000x900, 81.98K)

Ashkenazi Jews have an average IQ of 115. Also, where is Jonas Salk? We could use more Jonas Salks right now.

Also, Google dysgenic fertility.

Niggers are a seperate genetically and racially alien sub-species of inhuman abominations who should be exterminated. You can still classify organisms who can have fertile offspring together as different species. That fallacy is meaningless and used by midwits and other coping subhumans and dysgenics apoligists.

Attached: ac1ec588ee4309c51085f7c793d21db692692adac15b2d04b2722dae30aa03e3.jpg (265x400, 87.84K)

A recent study showed that Ashkenazi Jews had a higher frequency of genetic variants associated with high educational attainment than white Christians.

>scientific discovery started by chance
>shows a cherry-picked list where 90% are Caucasian
Not only that, 100% of the people in those pics are part neanderthal, unlike negros, aborigines, and some other races.

Look at :All of the scientists above are closer to each other than the closest one to a sub-saharan african. Way to BTFO your own point.

Attached: 1530185834602.jpg (1142x896, 140.11K)

>You have yet to provide a scientific argument
Okay. But neither have you.

>Scientific discoveries don't happen because "muh race".
If whoever wrote that (probably you) is trying to pass it off as an intelligent observation then I just feel sorry for them. They're arguing against something that nobody said. I would agree with the statement that science isn't done by races, because it is done by individuals. But all the rambling nonsense that follows that thesis seems to ignore that Europeans developed the scientific method and have been the most successful at using it.

I'm not really too worried about proving to you that white people are smarter than other races, whether by looking at scientific achievements, or comparing IQ tests, or simply by observing who has the best countries and how the people in them conduct themselves. I'm not the one that made this thread. You're the one that seems to want to prove something, and you have yet to have proven it.

>racism is a social construct

Attached: 1582894499708.png (899x407, 37.92K)