Is there any truthful information about the Jews that is NOT related to NatSoc (or similar) thinking?

Is there any truthful information about the Jews that is NOT related to NatSoc (or similar) thinking?

Which means that I want these texts to be as ideologically unbiased as possible.

Attached: C6B3C310-99A8-42ED-B87A-7F6B38C7BF3C.jpg (250x250, 5.83K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ynetnews.com/category/3083
timesofisrael.com
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/243832816
en.globes.co.il/en/article-israels-budget-surpluses-are-becoming-a-habit-1001207772
realjewnews.com/
nytimes.com/1993/10/12/world/israel-selling-china-military-technology-cia-chief-asserts.html
latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-12-28-mn-13774-story.html
govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRPT-105hrpt851/pdf/GPO-CRPT-105hrpt851.pdf
newsweek.com/china-israel-military-technology-beijing-jerusalem-saul-eisenberg-weapons-607117
newsfollowup.com/docs/jews/the_conquest_of_the_world_by_the_jews.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Is there any truthful information about the Jews that is NOT related to NatSoc (or similar) thinking?
yes
>Which means that I want these texts to be as ideologically unbiased as possible.
what texts ? what information are you looking for ?

>Is there any truthful information about the Jews that is NOT related to NatSoc (or similar) thinking?

Is it true that you guys are all spiteful, jealous, stooped, money grubbing shysters?

No one is certain what "Jew" means. It can be a common ancestor, a religion, or a nationality.

anything: news, essays, articles, etc.

Take the time to learn about Zionism newfag

Attached: 1CB930BA-927D-4EE7-9289-D7831060C677.jpg (700x858, 521.07K)

que mierda haces aqui?

BTDT. No matter which route you take down the rabbit hole, if you follow it far enough, you're going to end up at lizard fucking aliens. Kek.

Zionism from the perspective of the Jews, from the perspective of the Palestinians, from the perspective of other minorities, which one?

what about ? the food ? the music ? the culture ? the politics ?
you could read all your life about things related to jews and you wouldnt even read 1% of all there is you need to be more specific.if i asked you for 'truthful information about colombia' what would you tell me ?
there's many news sites , all politically biased this way or that but heres one for example

sorry i was linking that general in another thread i meant this
ynetnews.com/category/3083

politics, geopolitics, economy.

>not natsoc
Jews lie and use their "friends" for their own benefits.
You don't have to subscribe to natsoc to figure that out user.

Attached: EIPRYzvXkAUWUab.png (704x550, 190.65K)

I like this site
timesofisrael.com

well we just had our third election in the past year, 2 failed but they seem to want to seriously negotiate this time because of the corona stuff. gantz and bibi are now discussing forming a gvernment together by joining their parties but since gantz's party coalition was basically the 'hate bibi' party coalition it fell apart the moment he started negotiating with bibi. the whole thing kinda looks like a shonen anime right now but this is more or less as much as we know at this point.
geopolitics i dunno what to tell you, there's the gas pipeline to europe with cyprus and greece, there's bibi's international 'coalition of right wingers' with people like bolsonaro and orban and all those types theres too many stuff to count.
as for economy we mostly run on tech startups we're a major world startup hub and a world leader in some fields of millitary tech and infosec, also we have a diamond trade and export a lot of pharma.

all this is shit off the top of my head as i said if you want something be more specific.

Attached: 6c1m2a4er4p41.png (559x420, 304.39K)

Shalom

Attached: download (3).png (263x191, 1.79K)

also just as a side thing what's wrong with natsoc sources\thinking ? i mean many current politicians and ideologies are based on them because they had many good ideas.

Attached: 87459833_2477843925812526_1643192566906093568_o.jpg (1055x699, 189.9K)

Most of the so-called anti-semitic websites simply quote Israeli news sources and add hardly any comment since none is really needed. See pic for an example.

Attached: USS Liberty Proof.jpg (1080x1836, 666.47K)

its leftist propaganda, not as bad as haaretz but than haaretz was literally newspaper of the commie party

I knew Haaretz was liberal but not this one.

>any Israeli news source that makes Israel look bad to the goyim is a commie news source
Oy vey Shut it down!

Read The International Jew by Henry Ford. Written well before ww2.

This.

Attached: 243-2436014_it-was-probably-90-garbage-last-year-from.png (920x675, 84.84K)

Jeez man I don’t know. just Zionism in general

A lot, this kind of reliable info triggers the jews too much. The jewish lobby even has books and documentaries about it.

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/243832816

Lmao all the information is attacked as being "natosoc/nazi/antisemite" as a form of character attack at it's very lowest level, sometimes even before the inception of the idea.
Not that you ever could without being "canceled" but demand that someone justify how questioning the statistics of the holocaust make you antisemitic, without ever hearing the reasons/sources of your doubts, they can't, because it isn't necessarily. But everybody is told that it is, and anyone who does it is a nazi, so now everybody is nazis, which incidentally fuels antisemitic feelings and suspicions. This isn't really hard to understand but clown world I guess

You would do the same if you were a Jew.

haaretz isnt liberal its leftist

Attached: 1586056816085.jpg (875x483, 455.93K)

Literally case in point. It's absolutely disturbing that these kind of things are just dismissed as "reee nazi rhetoric". The fact that people become so distressed about a simple narrative that they have to shut it down as nazi rhetoric just begs heavy suspicion. It's not like Iran didnt shoot down a plane full of canadians a while ago. Nobody got called _____ for saying that was fucked up, cause it was.
Just clown world. Absolute clown world.

Still relevant after all these years. The truth never gets old or out of date.

What do you mean by "liberal"? Libertarian or democratic socialist?

do you know what the word liberal means ? well leftism is pretty much the opposite in most regards

Why do you think that is? No loaded question but I haven't heard many differing opinions.
Why would they be so blatantly afraid of simple conversations that don't mean anything? It reminds me of children when they're trying to hide something they've done wrong, if you ask any detail about it they dissolve into a blubbering mess and babble about how they didn't do it.

When AIPAC successfully lobbied Congress to give Israel the biggest military aid package in American history, Israel had been running an annual budget surplus of ten billion for five years.

en.globes.co.il/en/article-israels-budget-surpluses-are-becoming-a-habit-1001207772

Attached: wasted money.jpg (640x440, 45.77K)

You’re asking Yas Forums. The thing about Jews and Yas Forums is that Jewish sources are obviously lies. So, the biggest source on Jews is not usable.

Nowadays in North America, "classic liberal" means what you think "liberal" means, but "liberal" is the same as "leftist". I don't know why, but that's how people today over here use those words.

>Is there any truthful information about the Jews that is NOT related to NatSoc (or similar) thinking?
Look up Brother Nathaniel he has some youtube vids and, I think, this site: realjewnews.com/

Military Aid to Israel is security risk to the United States because of Israeli sales of American developed military technology to China. This has been going on since the early 1990's, nytimes.com/1993/10/12/world/israel-selling-china-military-technology-cia-chief-asserts.html

China's first fourth generation jet fighter is an Israeli design. (n China, it is called the J-10, in Israel it was called the Lavi. It is basically a variant of the American F-16. The J-10 is the pride of the Chinese Air force. Being able to purchase this design was a boon to China, it allowed to side step years of research and development.
latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-12-28-mn-13774-story.html

A report to Congress on China's rising military power stated the israel was the second largest supplier of technology to the Chinese Military.
govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRPT-105hrpt851/pdf/GPO-CRPT-105hrpt851.pdf

China is so grateful for this backdoor to Western military technology that it considers Israel an ally.
newsweek.com/china-israel-military-technology-beijing-jerusalem-saul-eisenberg-weapons-607117

Is it possible to be an ally of the United States and Communist China at the same time?

Attached: Israel China.jpg (2290x1322, 499.51K)

I'm Armenian and my people suffered genocide by the Ottoman Turks (they did the same to Greeks and Assyrians too). The Turks still deny today that they did it, even though there is overwhelming evidence, including photographs of crucified young women. Obviously, none of us would want genocide denial to gain traction. So I can understand why the Jews are so defensive about it.

the word dosnt magically change because you americans are retarded, liberal is liberal

You're not wrong, I was just confused.

"Liberalism" has meant different things at different times, Back the 19th century it about free trade,

That’s actually a weird quirk of Israel - their government keeps low debt to gdp relatively because otherwise wars would bankrupt them.

So the United States goes into debt instead of them.. Thanks Greatest Ally!

Leave Jews alone

Tbh, we’re going into debt regardless might as well let schlomo skim a bit.

David Icke in The Biggest Secret makes the case that Jews are puppets and scapegoats for the Illuminati. Yas Forums on the other hand is convinced the Illuminati is a red herring that's meant to distract from Jews being the real masters; extra- (and intra-) terrestrials basically never factor into their equation with this theory.

What came to mind for me was Osman Bey newsfollowup.com/docs/jews/the_conquest_of_the_world_by_the_jews.pdf

This was written 54 years before the rise of Hitler.

"The Secret Government" by Cherep-Spiridovich was 1926.

Bakunin was long before Hitler.

Robison, Barruel and Morse were all long before Hitler.

Edmund Burke's constant remarks about the "Old Jewry" are made in his "Reflections on the French Revolution."

What about U.S. Military Intelligence?

How about the suppressed British White Paper of 1919?

Or Robert Wilton's book, the French version of which listed the Bolshevik Jews.

Even the poet, Lord Byron implicates "Rothschild" in one of his poems.

Victor Hugo mentions the riches of Rothschild in Les Miserables.

George Eliot remarks "richer than Jews" in Middlemarch.

You can search for Marx "The Russian Loan" that's like 80 years prior..

Attached: DostoyevskyQuotation1877.png (712x535, 596.26K)

If you show must jews the redpills on Yas Forums they would be just as surprised as you are.

There's an awful lot from British authors, British military men, implicating Jews. C.H. Douglas was a British major and his "Brief for the Prosecution" is gold against the Jews.

Attached: TheBrieffortheProsecutionFrontCover.png (197x299, 83.34K)

You would be the same. A lot of people in this board think in terms of absolutes. Which is ironic in the sense that you reject the rhetoric suggesting all White people are demonic, evil, etc

Why would a Jewish person want to help fight against TPTB and their twisted agenda, when you blame the actions of a few Jewish people on the majority?

Surely you must realize that if you want any chance at all to prevent any claimed agenda by the elite, you'll need allies from all ethnic groups.

Yes 13 does 50, but there are good black people. And yes, there are a lot of Jews in prominent places, but Judaism itself is not a monolithic entity and most Jews are good people. Brainwashed? Of fucking course. But they're just like you or I. Victims of manufactured consent and decades of propaganda.

Nothing is black and white, and if you don't realize that, you're not as intelligent as you think you are.

>also just as a side thing what's wrong with natsoc sources\thinking ?

Early natsoc sources are going to be a mix of people who fell for Hitler's bullshit and people who were involved in his degeneracy. Late natsoc sources are going to be a mixture of INCREDIBLY gullible people, people who have pilpuled themselves into believing Hitler's degeneracy was somehow good, and people who insist Hitler was good because they're horrible degenerates themselves. It's like Maoist or Stalinist sources - someone who excused the Holodomor, the liquidation of the kulaks, and the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact has no moral standing to complain about the sins of others.

Race before morality.

Ever had money problems,, you have to curb spending on all sorts of things.. foreign aid to a nation with a budget surplus that sells the military technology we give them to China is a pretty easy cut to make.

Sure it won't solve the debt problem, but it's a start.

But you do understand that just sperging out about it and performing character assasination isn't the proper way of proving your case, and would probably only increase suspicion. If you have solid evidence or testimony then there is nothing really to be concerned about. I do understand how frustrating/hurtful it would be for somebody to deny it all together. I understand why the jews would be frustrated by it as well but with how hard they've tried to stamp it out I've only grown more suspicious and with how much they use that victim card I can see their motivations for attacking it. Again these things only further my genocide. I've never even heard of the Armenian genocide, much less any Armenians using it as some sort of societal lever/cop out, or to undermine some other problem.
I think the whole premise of the matter regarding the jews is that a lot of the evidence and testimony does not line up at all, does not make sense/is conflicting, and instead of addressing why these errors exist you must be a nazi psychopath. This isn't as simple as something like flat earth where proponents of the conspiracy are ignoring some very basic principles, in fact the theories point to the very opposite, which is the most disconcerting.
Much like how the small percentage of whites who actually owned slaves somehow justifies hatred of all whites, despite the fact that a much larger number of whites fought to free those slaves. Not to mention the fact that those black people were captured and sold by other tribes in Africa. They say the winners write history but I don't see it. It's all so tiresome.

I don't trust Hitler. I inclined to trust Gunther, Feder, Rosenberg, Fritsch, and I don't think Hitler poisons the well for them.

I don't know how cliquist Nazism was. I hear stories about the deflated generals receiving Hitler's sabotaging orders at Dunkirk, etc., and truly feel for them. I feel for Roehm thinking about his execution, and I think there were many genuine men even if Hitler himself was a spy or double agent.

Attached: quotefromchdouglas2.png (634x500, 101.75K)

No, we need to give more money to Israel. Truly a bargain at any price.

This is a great point, I think more people need to understand this as well. I mention similar ideas in my previous post, obviously every member of any demographic isn't a representation of every, in the same ways that you mentioned. I do agree but that's one of the focuses of my discontent these days because it is very much "yes, all white people" and "yes, all men" as if trailer trash poor families have any say in the system in place. There's a major imbalance in the way these narratives play out and that isn't for no reason.

I completely understand what you are saying, but I still think we would do the same if we were Jews. Why tolerate any skepticism or questioning of it at all if its existence gives us so much leverage? If we could, why not just shut down all of our opponents? I know it makes people more suspicious, but it's not like they can do much about it.