Twitter link for direct source, GWP link for more information... If you're going to come in to my thread and attack my source without debunking the information directly then unironically kys and gtfo
Chloroquine / French Study / 1000+ Patience / 98% Sucess Rate
Other urls found in this thread:
nbcnews.com
thedailybeast.com
cnn.com
businessinsider.com
thegatewaypundit.com
theweek.com
covid19.healthdata.org
thegatewaypundit.com
urbandictionary.com
thegatewaypundit.com
public-cdn.sermo.com
twitter.com
>mortality rate 0.5
Lol so it's pretty much the same as the true mortality rate when you take into account of the number of people infected but not tested...
bump
I would imagine from a laymans perspective that it's effective in lessening side effects and putting a toll on the health care system. Those .5 percent were probably going to die anyway.
Good thing my governor banned it, I hope some shoots her in Minecraft
>not double blind
>no control, not even tylenol
>most participants women
>average age 47
cool study bro it sure gives us a lot of useful information
Controls are patients not given HCQ by other doctors
PATIENTS, not patience. I'm not even an american.
>The methodology isn't perfect, therefore the effects seen in patients treated have no significance whatsoever.
Yeah because it would be completely ethical to placebo people and watch them die right?
The drug has been around sense the 1940's we don't need a double blind study you fucking chink... It's obvious your motive here, delay everything, hope as many people die as possible and blame Trump...
You're IQ can't be any higher then 80 it's so fucking obvious what you're up to...
Thanks you're right I type about 120wpm, faster then I can think sometimes...
Bump
yeah, anecdotes have no evidentiary value
/-- Corona Timeline
>12/31/19
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: CLUSTERS OF CORONAVIRUS FOUND IN WUHAN
>1/14/20
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: NO CLEAR EVIDENCE OF HUMAN TO HUMAN TRANSMISSION
>1/15/20
NANCY PELOSI FINALLY SENDS IMPEACHMENT PAPERS OVER TO SENATE AFTER HOLDING THEM FOR WEEKS
nbcnews.com
>01/24/2020
4 SENATORS SELL THEIR STOCKS AFTER BEING BRIEFED
>1/30/20
TRUMP LAUNCHES CORONAVIRUS TASK FORCE
thedailybeast.com
>2/4/20
STATE OF THE UNION - TRUMP MENTIONS VIRAL AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES, PELOSI RIPS UP SPEECH
>2/7/20
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: MASKS DON'T OFFER ANY PROTECTION
>2/22/20
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION: NO BENEFIT TO STOPPING INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL
>3/13/20
TRUMP DECLARES NATIONAL EMERGENCY
cnn.com
>3/16/2020
BRITISH "EXPERTS" WARN OF 2M US DEATHS, 40M GLOBAL DEATHS
businessinsider.com
>3/29/2020
AMERICAN "EXPERTS" REDUCE TO 200,000 POTENTIAL US DEATHS
thegatewaypundit.com
>4/2/2020
EXPERTS WARN SOME 1 IN 3 CORONAVIRUS TESTS FAULTY, CAUSING FALSE POSITIVES
theweek.com
>4/5/2020
IHME "EXPERTS" DROP ESTIMATE TO 81,000 US DEATHS
covid19.healthdata.org
>4/8/2020
IHME "EXPERTS" DROP ESTIMATE TO 60,415 US DEATHS
thegatewaypundit.com
Who told you that anecdote? Or have you tested this idea with a double blind test with placebo?
I thought Tom Petty had died.
>cool study bro it sure gives us a lot of useful information
If the doctors treating the patients are saying the shit is working who are you to argue with them
What does KYS mean?
In the Netherlands there was a family doctor and local pharmacy who started prescribing the usual mix that goes around on social media to patients. And it cured all of his patients. But when the word came out in the media, the health inspection dropped by to stop him. So he received a warning to seize what he is doing.
>science is methodology
t.blinded
Except if that's the case, it would mean that the mortality rate is only for those who felt the need to be tested (i.e. symptomatic or close to someone who was found to be symptomatic).
kiss your sister
Add when Trump banned travel to China and Europe despite the WHO recommendation, for good measure.
BRO it's gotta be a RANDOM double-blind test with placebo or else it's COMPLETELY useless
pleb
>Kill YourSelf chang
lol grammer nazi
This, checked
You are missing a very important date in your timeline.
Pic related
They have observational value, and that observational value grows the more people that are tested on. If you had a drug that say, cured people, even those in ICU, within 12 hours, while people who continued to take nothing died anyway, even if you have thousands and thousands of reports saying the same thing, you still have no evidentiary value, just observational.
The point is you eventually reach a point where observational value is clearly showing its working. You're only technically right that evidentiary value isn't there, but to claim that's equal to being a useless anecdote that we can derive nothing from? Give me a break.
haha i chuckled
the shills were out in full force after hydroxychloroquine was touted as a treatment. that's how i knew it worked. all the governors who banned it have blood on their hands
Can't have people thinking for themselves and actually helping others. All must be beholden to the scientific dictatorship. Only they can determine what works.
You can certainly use it as justification for starting an actual study, but to claim that it's as good as an actual study is retarded.
Your epistemology is shit. There can be no probability value as to the expected efficacy of this treatment if there is no comparison to other treatments. There can be no extrapolation of effects if there is not a sufficiently large random sample of patients. You'd know that "hurr durr it looks liek dis wurkd" isn't a good basis for evidence if you'd ever paid attention in class, faggots.
You're a fucking moron who thinks he knows how science works because he passed high school. Dumb mutts like you belong in the ground.
If you found out you had the virus and were offered hcq and zinc would you take the drugs or would you refuse because there exists no double blind randomized trial?
98% success.... so like... 2% mortality?
seems in line with doing nothing what am i missing
WE CAN'T KNOW HOW SUCCESSFUL IT IS UNTIL WE TAKE THE VACCINE FIRST
>The drug has been around sense the 1940's we don't need a double blind study you fucking chink
I think you meant since. Yes it has been around since the 40s so we understand side effects really well. But it has only been used to treat SARS-2 for about two months, so we have very little understanding of it's relationship with the virus.
A double blind study would be to remove any doubts that this drug, or a combination of this drug with others (Say zinc) is effective for treating SARS-2. There is a really good reason for the FDA's drug use vetting process. We want to make sure that the known effectiveness of our drugs is based on airtight evidence, not expert opinion.
Oh look, a totally clueless /cvg/ doomer.
Pr. Raoult prescribed the recommended mix to patients who should have been put on ventilators. They recovered
>seems in line with doing nothing what am i missing
doing nothing = people on ICU
CHQ treatment = people recover
This is 2% for people who were sick enough to go to a hospital, which is pretty good.
He's right you fucking loser snd all you can do is cry. Go back to bagging groceries.
98% "success" while
covid has 2% mortality
schizos are confused when doing math off meds
There's a control group called "Every other patient not given the treatment"
NO NO NO NO NOOOOOO!!!! The orange man is BAD and he's WRONG! We need vaccines and RFIDs not cheap and effective cures!!!!
that would be like throwing people out of a plane without a parachute just to see if they will hit the ground
Shut the fuck up, Morty.
You know what's funny? This dude who is top tier in his field has been treated like shit by the french media, reletlenssy mocked by those fuckers. He has been ignored by the politicians, to an unreal point. Those shithead just HAD to listen to him because he, followed by the french people basically said fuck you to all those big pharma stooges.
THE JEW FEARS THE CELT
this faggot needs to shave his beard, he never stops touching it. unsure how he ran a study when he would be too compromised for PPE
>We want to make sure that the known effectiveness of our drugs is based on airtight evidence, not expert opinion.
I doubt my bath towel as been certified effective to be used as a tourniquet but if you had a person who was shot in the leg would you use it or refuse because its effectiveness is not known?
Observation alone demonstrates something is happening, it appears positive, and you have people who will die otherwise. The substance in question is also generally safe.
Only an idiot or a monster would deny the use of the substance in question
>no comparison to other treatments
HCQ was highest recommended treatment of COVID-19 out of 15 drugs tested
>not a sufficiently large random sample of patients.
6,227 physicians across all specialties were sampled from 30 countries with a minimum sample size of 250.
ok then. I'll bite.
Prove social distancing works
I need pictures of Raoult bitchslapping Corona-chan.
>NOOOOOOO 18 MONTHS OF LOCKDOWN EVERYONE NEEDS TO BE HOOKED ON GIBS AND HOMELESS SO WE CAN TAKE OVER IN OUR SOCIALIST UTOPIA NOOOOOO
Raoult already explained he his morally obliged to help every patients and thus give his medications to all of them. This is warfare medicine, we can't afford usual luxuries
What is the mortality rate of a patient going on a ventilatorvs that 2% mortality rate?
lol no. Raoult clearly adressed this point, explaining random double-blind test is just fashionable nowadays but doesnt give better results than what we did before. But hey, you surely know more than the dude who is one of the best of the world in this field, am i right?