Poll - Would you accept the mark in your hand?

"And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."
(Revelation 13:11-18 KJV)

Attached: 9d9c8aa3f42f2eae0605bced877bb4b4-imagepng.png (1531x2000, 2.86M)

kill yourself glownigger

If it's that or die, then I'm being forced to, so I will.

That doesn't mean there won't be hell to pay.

Live to fight another day, anons.

Everyone should have access to a digital ID that enables them to prove who they are across institutional and international borders and across time, while giving them control over how their personal information is collected, used, and shared.

Over my dead body will somebody place a mark on me.

I also never carry I.D cards because it's a similar thing, it's degrading and implies you are not worth knowing and are just a document.

Back in the day you never needed things like I.D badges because everybody knew each other, if there was somebody that shouldn't be there they would really stick out.

making it look like the mark of the beast to the religious is honesty a master stroke of eugenics. create useful new technology with many potentially life saving applications. disguise it as an ancient source of superstition. then sit back and let natural selection take its course.

This is the mark of the beast:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libellus

Now knock it off.

papers dont go IN your hand you idiot

nobody cares christcuck. gods are disgusting unsightly mind parasites and I would rather suck satans angelic boydick then be infected with one everytime. .

your quick use perverse sexual imagery shows well the degenerate state of the atheistic mind. seek god, and remedy your irrational anger towards him.
youtu.be/WDEBz25lGdY

Attached: 1565643048826.jpg (1006x1177, 419.1K)

What is that object in her ass? How did she get a hook up in there too?

Who is that, and what did she shove up her ass?

If you're right ; you've nothing to worry about, but...

Attached: image.png (350x236, 157.63K)

God and Satan are one and the same, idiot. He's just trolling you.

pascals wager only makes sense if there is only one religion kek.

how do you know you won't burn forever for failing to appease the god of adorable twink cocks instead?

who cares about pascals wager you disgusting sodomite? no one mentioned it but you have to larp like a big brain when its obvious to everyone your brain is miniscule

You saying that Jesus is a liar?

Attached: image.jpg (768x1024, 254.8K)

this post is a reference to pascals wager or at least the argument it presents.

Yeah, that's Pascal's wager, all right.

Attached: image.png (500x500, 143.9K)

couldn't say never met him.

dont reply to the sodomite user diseases are spreading super easy nowadays

No.

this

why is her hair not covered?

because she's not a nun, nor a muslim

For all of Christian history, women covered their hair. Being a nun is simply adopting a different behavior set and has nothing to do with the broader Christian populace.

you mean catholic history right? most real christians dont care about the catholic churches tradition. also youre wrong either way, only married women covered their heads. trust jesus.

Absolute nonsense. Hair coverings among European women used to be universal and the difference in broach and hair decoration placement (such as a medal-style pin with national iconography) would indicate marriage.

Real Christian women cover up their hair.

Bump

>is that a quantum dot tattoo on your hand?
>get the fuck outta here

Attached: chipcucks HATE him.jpg (250x275, 23.85K)

show me in the bible where is says that
stop watching movies retard
rosaliegilbert.com/hairstyles.html

Never let them chip you.

Are you being serious?

Women MUST cover heads and hair. It DOESN'T talk about face. Just head hair.

1 Corinthians 11:5

But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved.

1 Corinthians 11:6

For if a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.

1Co 11:13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
1Co 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
1Co 11:15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
1Co 11:16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

1 corinthians 11:15: "but if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her HAIR IS GIVEN HER FOR A COVERING."

Attached: 1565604071289.jpg (1920x1196, 833.43K)

LITERALLY not what is being said.

The entire point of 11:5 is to show that shaving head is not being uncovered and having hair is not being "covered" because a woman without a hair covering who is is prayer is THE SAME as a woman who has her head shaved.

It is not posed as that at all; it is written with a "?" as a rhetorical. What bible version are you using?

the hair is given her for a covering
1 Corinthians 11:15

Literally not what is being said. Because why would they compare a woman in prayer without hair covering as the same thing as a woman with a shaved head? They are clearly different things but the bible says that the behavior of prayer without covering hair is no different in shamefulness than if a woman was to shave her head.

literal pharisee
Joh 8:43-44 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. (44) Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

youre misunderstanding verse 5. verse 6 clarifies. the if she doesnt have long hair she might as well be bald. the woman must have long hair or she is in sin

1 Corinthians 11:6

>For if a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.

Why the fuck would they compare not covering head with the penalty of having it all cut of? It would be redundant to cut off hair if it already served as an adequate covering.

It says nothing about length of hair at all. That is 100% your inserted interpretation.

1 Corinthians 11:7

>For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.

The "BUT" is there because she is supposed to cover her head, as is explained further on because it would be redundant to shave a head for "not covering" if the head with hair was already covering enough.

this whole passage is about hair brainlet
1Co 11:15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.

Can you not read but a single sentence for comprehension and not a full passage or narrative?

Why the fuck would they compare not covering head with the penalty of having it all cut of? It would be redundant to cut off hair if it already served as an adequate covering.

hes comparing short hair to bald headed. paul is saying that if a womans hair isnt long her head might as well be exposed, which it explains why that is wrong. because the womans head is the man, and the head of the man is christ. so the man should have short hair, and the woman should have long hair. Your anger is a sign of impotent rage because you have no idea what youre talking about

its stupid but it would more than likely be something required for continuation of normal life

That's why literally every woman in history of European history veiled herself regardless of marital status, right? I guess all of them back then just had super impotent rage issues.

Way to sound like a nigger.

Whats your source on that because that didnt happen

It depends if they will track everything I say and do then fuck no
Otherwise yes

Tell me what class of woman in the middle ages that wasn't a literal child walked around with uncovered hair and was treated as anything more than a slut?

You can't, because all of the women of the time were veiled for modesty.

1Co 11:13-14 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? (14) Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?

Attached: 7822d0603b78db3ecbdedd2a211d69053ab4b4d8c6936fc8c30e7c3ff4c81bc7.png (1024x1365, 27.31K)