>What is /rwts/? Right Wing Translation Squad is a project that was created by anons to translate books from barbaric languages into the more civilized English tongue.
>What have you done so far? We translated Sportvorschrift fur das Heer, the German fitness manual (available at archive.org/details/sportsvorschrift). It took a while because of external and internal issues, but we did most of the work in a whim and the next project whill be a hell of a lot faster!
>What are you doing now? In the last threads we decided to get started on Islam, Judentum, Bolschewismus by Mohamed Sabry, available here >nseuropa.org/German/Sabry, Mohamed - Islam, Judentum, Bolschewismus (1938).pdf We've made a few pages, but we still need to get the work rolling, so feel free to contribute if you want!
We need translations of the German Conservative Revolutionary movement: >Othmar Spann >Edgar Jung >Hans Freyer >Arthur Moeller van den Bruck >Ernst Niekisch >Karl Haushofer >Ludwig Klages
Also could do with Alexander Dugins first major book - Foundations of Geopolitics
Dylan Campbell
It needs to be said that while Islam is not a religion for the whole of Europeans and this won't change anytime soon, during the Reich era there was a strange alliance between Muslims and National Socialists. The NSDAP, while promoting Positive Christianity, was only against atheism and this resulted in many faiths being "tolerated", if you will. Fighting two colonial empires such as France and Britain, it only made sense that the liberated people in Africa and the Middle East looked up, to an extent, to those who came to free them of their oppressors; plus, it is Islamic doctrine to hate the non-believer (in this case Bolschevists) more than any infidel (in this case... well, anyone who isn't a Muslim). While we should NOT take their ways as ours or vice versa, I personally think there can be a certain grey area of collaboration against a common enemy with those Muslims who don't come in Europe to be degenerates worthy of the death penalty in their own lands, and this book explains their perspective on the issue.
I looked it up and it sounds very interesting, is there any title in particular? If it stirs up interest among the anons we can put it in queue, the Islam book is less than 40 pages
Isaac Sanders
Why would anyone want to read trash?
Austin Rogers
What would you define as trash?
Mason Johnson
>Moeller van den Bruck Das dritte Reich has already been translated by arktos as "germany's third empire". it's easier if someone just bought a copy and scanned it at a public library than deal with an original german version (expensive and written in fraktur) or the uwe berg reprint (affordable, but still in fraktur) >Edgar Jung His smaller works are hard to come by and his magnum opus is huge. i have a reprint right here and its approx. 700 pages long. i doubt i could do it myself and scanning that stuff would be an absolute horror, especially right now that there are no libraries open.
We had an user who was a professional stenographer yesterday, I'm assuming he could greatly help in transcribing from Fraktur if need be
Chase Peterson
fraktur is not that much of a problem, i just think ripping a transcribed and translated copy is a lot less trouble than doing transcribing and translating yourself. regarding fraktur, you get used to it after some 50 pages of reading it. the problem is either someone with access to a quality scanner has to shill out the 30€ for a reprint and scan the book. transcribing might be an option so the work of translation can be spread further
Nathaniel Morris
There's still OCR if we have a decent scan
Liam Butler
All right, I'm more or less finished with translating a short article on miscegenation and inbreeding written in Swedish written by Herman Lundborg in 1918, Lundborg pioneered the Swedish research on racial hygiene among other things and was the driving force behind creating, as well as it's first chief of our nowadays infamous "Institute for racial biology". Improvements to the edition can still be done, I started only first reading the article 12h ago and had not had the opportunity to analyze my work with fresh eyes, so expect some errors.
However, given that the demand for any Swedish material is somewhat uncertain I feel that it's in an adequate state to be released.
Preview of basedness: >"All across southern and central America, where an absolute blood chaos exists, can we find fertile grounds for a substantial racial degradation, well, one could even call it a racial putrefaction. The impossibility of having a high culture with these conditions is obvious. Anarchy, murders and revolutions etc. are all part and parcel of the everyday life."
Islam is jew 2.0 incl circumcision and black cube saturnalia There is no colonialism anymore your doctrine is outdated.
Thomas Turner
Oh, I tried it but Italy apparently has that site blocked. Weird. I downloaded the file anyway, thanks mate!
Do you have anything related to Franco?
>there is no colonialism America and Israel are effectively keeping the middle east politicians under their foot, so eh, I doubt it
Leo Perez
Strange, anyway, it was my pleasure. If this will create somewhat of an interest I'll do an updated version with a refined translation and I can also volunteer for contributing with similar works.
John Collins
200 years together, by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn. I wonder (((why))) it hasn’t been translated.
Isaac Ross
would help me a lot since the biggest problem i have is distinguish old f from old s
Page 23 first paragraph
This incident is the reason why, until this very day, jews are called "microbes". Because of this could the Arabs understand particularly good, when in Gernamy likewise people imposed vigorous measures against the jews and they were chased away like mangy dogs. Nonetheless, the Arabs themselves are the ones suffering, because the Jews, most of whom from Germany, turned towards Palestine. There the jewish scum from all the lands of the world found itself together, to take away the land from the Arabs. They bought together the land from the poorest of the poor and from the unknowing landowners, they took the bread from the mouths of poor widows, took the milk from the children to bloat (?) themselves. They did not shy away from committing bloody murder, when the Arabs rose against jewish immigration, and have robbed many families of their provider, bringing them to misery. "God will punish them for these scandalous crimes!"
The battle of Jews against the Arabs is nothing new, only the location has changed through the flow of time. Jews hate Mohammed and Islam and every other human that wants to promote / advdance their Nation and fights against jewish stinginess and corruption. The Battle between jews and islam began when Mohammed was forced to flee from Mecca to Medina, where he estabilished the basis for the development of Islam. Already since back then were the jews big business people , and immediately noticed that the influence of Mohammed could become dangerous to them, in both spiritual and business fields. Therefore they held a deep hatred towards Islam, and this hate grew more and more, the more stronger and powerful Islam became. They broke the contracts they had made with Mohammed, and their anger reached its zenith, when the Quran made their deep spiritual stirs (spiritual troubles) known and exposed their unscrupulousness and ignorance, making it known to all. And even back then were the jewish methods the same as today. Their weapon was as always, defamation, and so they tried to belittle Mohammed in the eyes of his followers.
I´m working on translating Roman Dmowski´s "Przewrót". Roman Dmowski was one of the founding fathers of the Second Polish Republic and the father of modern Polish nationalism. He admired Mussolini and Hitler, and dropped redpills about Jewry during the first world war, way before Hitler. While most of the things he says in the book have already been said in Mein Kampf, an interesting point he makes is that the partitioning of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1795 never would have happened if it wasn't for Jewry assisting the occupants, especially Prussia.
Easton Phillips
>civilized english tongue Nice bait, english looks and sounds like a bastard child of French and German that has been left to rot by itself for centuries on an island. English is like that unwanted child that got abandoned, came back and badly influenced the whole neighborhood anyways
Brody Anderson
Maybe, but It's the most spoken language in the world, and therefore has wider reach.
Andrew Perez
Bruh, is irony foreign to you? As the Albanian boi said, it's easier to reach a wide audience in English than in other languages, at least at this point in time. We'd probably be speaking French if we were in the Victorian period, or Latin in the middle ages
Pic related is this, Bosnian - NDH, SS Handzar Dzemaludin Causevic
Benjamin White
>As the Albanian boi said, it's easier to reach a wide audience in English than in other languages, at least at this point in time. this it isn't that hard to understand that with English you can communicate in almost every part of the world
Wyatt Watson
>the most spoken language in the world Mandarin Chinese
Cameron Mitchell
Need any French works translating in the future?
Thomas Lewis
Only spoken in 1-2 countries, and ching chong is an ugly language.
John Hill
Yes! Do you know of any books pertaining to the Action Francaise, the Dreyfus Affair, or Vichy France?
Ian Cooper
page 2 and 3 are also finished
Jonathan Rogers
Neat, can you send a pastebin link to the work you've done?
Eli Richardson
>Sportvorschrift fur das Heer Formatting is shit. You are blind and you don't care about the material at all. You are literally beneath the level of a sabotaging jew. Shame on you. Faggot.
Bentley Mitchell
You need none of that shit.
Landon Gomez
>bloat(?) better would be "to fatten themselves"
Josiah Peterson
What's up with the silly hats? Are these muslims?
Chase Reyes
I was unsure about that, but yes fatten is more fitting.
Zachary Garcia
Yes, Bosnia
William Perry
I'll see if there's any that are untranslated. There will be plenty for Action Francaise, as very little was covered abroad. Dreyfus, too. Vichy France, unsure. I'm a Britbong, but if any actual Frenchies are about, they may be able to guide as to any works needing translating. The French really do have some excellent Right-Wing thinkers.
Zachary Cox
There's an excellent book called: 'Doctrine d'action contrerévolutionnaire' (The Doctrine of Counter-Revolutionary Action) by Colonel Pierre Chateau-Jobert chire.fr/A-112334-doctrine-d-action-contrerevolutionnaire.aspx It is not a National-Socialist book, but he is a man of the Right, albeit a French one. It's full of excellent guidance, in terms of organisation, planning, aims, even military goals, of all Counter-Revolutionary Action. Really worthwhile book which would be of great use, once we've finished with Sabry's book. The Right could do with this information in English.
There was no alliance, most Muslims went in droves towards the Allies while very few supported the Axis. Muslims and kikes are one and the same as can be seen throughout history
Jaxon Foster
Ok mr Shill I will go kms thanks for your kind advice
Yes and no. Remember that Germans liberated Palestine from the British empire
Eli Myers
False, the book being translated is literally the opposite of that.
Asher Taylor
Would love that! Can you give me a sneak peek at what it says exactly?
Oliver Edwards
Bump
Dylan Sanchez
Sorry, I was hunting for a PDF, but cannot find a free one online. It might be a question of scanning it in. I'll translate the blurb for you, one moment.
Colton Garcia
That doesn't change the fact that the overwhelming majority of muslims involved in the war took the side of the Allies as opposed to the Axis.
Julian Roberts
How to act? That is the question which most men ask themselves and to which ‘Doctrine of Counter-Revolutionary Action’ responds. This manual will astound the ‘activist’ who will at last find therein the reason for action which he had lacked until then. It will astonish the woman, who will realise that she too has a role to play, to participate in defending the interests of her family. It will even shock the intellectual who does not believe himself to be a ‘man of action’. How many men and women imagine that they can contribute nothing to the development of society? They would hope that such development would be working towards the true interests of men, rather than towards the ever greater confiscation of their most legitimate freedoms and rights by that same society. They are able to recognise, however, that their adversaries, be they Marxists or Technocrats, easily mobilise their human efforts and know how to apply very simple methods in order to act effectively. Do we, for our part, have to declare ourselves beaten? Surely not! Do we ourselves have to adopt the means and processes which we condemn in others? Surely not! We have at our disposition all sufficient legitimate means, and, our Doctrine of Action surpasses, by a great distance, the techniques of the enemy. Action is a duty if one does not wish, by passivity, to make oneself the accomplice of those who act against us as enemies.
