Why do Spic Fuentes and other alt right retards hate napolean and the french revolution?

why do Spic Fuentes and other alt right retards hate napolean and the french revolution?

Napolean was legitmently a hero of the average citizen, introducing more fair laws, a more fair society, freeing religious groups, etc, throughout his empire.

The reason why he was ganged up on was because his progressive and liberal agenda was literally a threat to the way of life of the predatory monarchies in Great Britian, Austria, Russia, etc that ruthlessly exploited the common peasentry.

The current predatory rich world order would not want to champion a hero like that which is why he is demonized

also eternal anglo butthurt

Attached: real hero and real human bean.jpg (260x260, 15.06K)

Napoleon was Italian

Corsicans are neither French nor Italian. They were Greek in origin. I guess their contemporaries are Italian however.

There were no such thing as italian in 18 century. Sardinians was, corsicans was, savoyans, sicillians etc, but italians dont existed

>freeing religious groups
You mean Jews.

As far as I can tell Napoleon was hitler before it was cool.

> Why doesn't the alt-right like liberalism and progressivism

You kinda answered your own question. Also, isn't it kinda obvious that Napoleon was simply an opportunist using those principles to increase his own power? He seemed like a monarch pretending to oppose monarchy for his own personal gain.

Yes, but Hitler didn't go around putting Jewish bankers in charge of things.

I swear retards who criticize Napoléon are fucking monarchists who would prefer to live under the domination of a King and his whole court of useless faggots living off taxpayer money and sucking off the country's wealth while pretending that they're not a bunch of hereditary motherfuckers whose only leverage in life is nepotism

Didn't Napolean crown himself Emperor and install his brothers and nephews as princes all over the place?

When did he say he hates Napoleon?

>more "fair" laws,
>a more "fair" society,
>freeing (((religious groups)))
Equality was a mistake.

Yes.

Neapolitan just isn't as good as classic vanilla.

Sort of. They're all Caesar-like figures.
If you look at policy though, Caesar destroyed the republic and laid the groundwork for the empire. This was long after the Kingdom of Rome was gone.
Hitler supported the Hohenzollerns until they were overthrown. Then he rose up and created a Third Reich.
Napoleon was directly involved in ruining France and used his ((("empire"))) to spread proto-globohomo throughout Europe.
That said, I respect the man's abilities, but he used them for evil.

>Napolean was legitmently a hero of the average citizen
He also sought to improve his own people by eliminating class barriers when it came to getting titles and what not. Which conservatives harp on and on about only accepting people of merit when it comes to shit like affirmative action. Napoleon literally defended his country from aggressors so hard that he was on the offensive.

It was only a mistake when equality started to mean that we had start accepting literal degenerates.

Agreed. Regardless of his idealism, it was certainly proto-globohomo, the E.U. will be dissolved. One worlder shit will never take hold, we are different species, it merely has to be managed well. All efforts to paper unify it on paper and with pomp and circumstance will be corrupted, theyll be understood as experiments.

Napoleon fought to restore order in his country end the constant back and forth of coup and counter-coup, he took France back from the radicals and kept the decadent effeminate nobility away from power and instituted meritocracy. He was guilty of nothing.

He emancipated the jews and fucked up the monarchies of Europe

Because democracy is the biggest of geys.

Napoleon started the biggest war europe had ever seen. He was way more predatory than anyone who came before him.

sounds pretty based

The game we're forced to pain just for someone the non-humans wish to control. The story is: we're their puppets, in their play pen, so that they could have new bodies in the future.

hahaha this faggot thinks enlightenment ideals were a good thing and didn't lead to our current mess

HAHAHAHAHAHA FUCKIN LOW IQ FAGGOT

Funny, when modern democratic states, which napoleon paved the way for, raise much more taxes than any monarchy ever did, and have more leeches doing nothing and getting fat off taxpayer money as a result.
This is really a non-argument.

Also this Are you people going to say ancient Greece was "proto-globo homo" because they invented democracy and it was all just leading right to where we are today?

"égalité de liberté"

By your standards, Rome was globohomo

A lot of greeks looked down on democracy even back then. The majority of greek states were always monarchies.

Yea this, I haven't seen his stream the last couple days guess I have to catch up. Makes you wonder how long the nobel hierarchy could have lasted in Europe.

Attached: 3b-gr04-duke-of-wellington.jpg (500x613, 104.96K)

>He started the wars
Look across the Channel for the real instigator.

Napoleon lamented that had he been born but a 100 years earlier he could have been a god.

There is literally nothing wrong with that.

Too long ago. The concept holds, but its irrelevant. If you want to say that, go ahead.

Ancient Greece was actually homo though

I didnt say that. You did.

Lol a German claiming Napoleon started the wars, are you retarded or is teaching history illegal in Doucheland.

Yes.

Sparta and Macedonia > Ath*ns

Yes.

The Yas Forums pol and k crew are mostly reincarnations of ancient Greeks and Romans

French were basically proto Bolsheviks that tore down a millennia of tradition for some empty phrases that helped deconstruct their entire identity.

Teaching real history is actually illegal in Germany.

Attached: 1556934668573.gif (250x195, 800.58K)

I'm saying it's dumb to say something that didn't happen in the last 100 years directly lead to the current state of things

>Sparta
>women can inherit property
Globo-homo.

Of course he HAD to keep going after what happened in the first revolutionary wars. There was just no other way was there?

Indeed it was.

Yes, most of the wars were started by the coalition members

Your revolution was a revolution of the middle class bankers and lawyers that forced republicanism on peasants that didn't even want it.

Because france had shown a willingness to overthrow all current order in its captured territories and turn everything in its way into a republic. Something Napoleon was very keen on continuing.

>alt right retards

Self explanatory. The aut-right really is just cuckservatism with more idpol

>>women can inherit property
What else is supposed to happen to the property?

What did he mean by this?

If Napoleon was Italian. Your sister who gives birth in Nigeria to a pure white boy will have a Nigerian child.

Give it to their sons

>252802359
their languages most closely resembled that of modern italy. He was Italian

This.
And it was Napoleon's nephew, Napoleon III who helped "italians" kingdoms to be gathered as a nation.

A whole community among a street neighbourhood would be globohomo to most of these fags who isolate in their mom's basement

What if they didn't have sons or they died/ got killed?

The jews and rothschilds were actually against him. Also the monarchies were extremely complacent and degenerate

He gave to his brother Spanish crown.

Mostly because the French Revolutionary and Napoleon were free mason faggots, so it makes sense that Nick and his mindless followers hate him since Nick is a catholic.
With that being said, you have to give Napoleon some credit for stopping the revolutionaries from destroying churches.

There was no Italian nation but the concept of an Italian still existed