Why don’t Europeans build tall skyscrapers like America?

Why don’t Europeans build tall skyscrapers like America?

Asia and the Middle East do it for penis projection (the Burj Khalifa and the tallest buildings in China have always been historically empty) Americans build tall because the market demands it, but why don’t Europeans do it? They are much denser than us, and cities like London have a large demand for office space, yet their buildings are tiny compared to American office and residential buildings

Attached: FAAE69CF-1501-4823-AFF8-93C95CCA23BB.jpg (643x1306, 333.93K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Brazil
skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=88805836
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Gustav
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It's stupid, only subhumans waste time with this nonsense, like arabs or asians with the Freudian complex you mentioned.

The shard is owned by the government of Qatar

well in general skyscrapers are ugly

Europeans are too busy sucking each others hemorrhoids to build anything that tall

Because our architecture reflects our penises, humble but highly aesthetic, well crafted, sturdy and stand the test of time.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Brazil

skyscrapers are ugly

large cities are a cancer on the word. literally pus filled blisters on the planets service.

Cancerous tumors being fed via their parasitic systems feeding them water, food goods via all transportations channel.

It made sense when you had to walk to businesses to do business. now cities are utterly obsolete and should be recognized as the goy cattle feeding lots they truly are.

Attached: hs.jpg (1400x1400, 356.42K)

>Why don’t Europeans build tall skyscrapers like America?

Why dont europeans ruin their architecture like us?

Skycraper? no, thanks.

Attached: erftgh.jpg (3881x2183, 3.14M)

In the case of London its because of strict building regulations so the historical buildings don't lose their prominence.

Attached: glowing-wands.jpg (968x728, 59.39K)

>civilizational sour grapes

We don't need to compensate for something.

>so the historical buildings don't lose their prominence.
OY RETARD YOU GOT A LAICENSE FOR THAT SKYSCRAPER??

Because Europeans don’t want to have a 9/11 of their own

Nigga this shit is miles and miles away from any actual city. I get your point but there isn't any demand to stick skyscrapers next to castles.

London is almost entirely clay so its really difficult to build anything tall there and since its the capital city, that's where the big shit gets built.

Its also really hard to build deep foundations because of the existing pipe and underground networks, as well as historical sites.

Can't speak for the rest of Europe. but I assume its mostly geography.

shush we don't want subhuman retards like to gain any insight. they're literally incapable of dealing with the truth of things. aka; women.

>Why don’t Europeans build tall skyscrapers like America?

Because we don't have the kind of national insecurity that Americans have.

Attached: average american street.jpg (1518x789, 173.34K)

>Americans build tall because the market demands it
You do it for the same penis enlargement motives.

where they have good rocky ground, they do a lot more
where they don't, they just don't
since cities were build in different epochs, different environments were chosen

The Shard is a disgusting blight on London and I hope to see it reduced to rubble.

Maybe... Just maybe... We don't want to replace our old, fancy architecture?

T I N Y
skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=88805836

Attached: 325021E9-03F8-4A61-86DC-D1FE1D79B51F.jpg (1242x1064, 680.04K)

Most of France looks like that pic

Most of those look like canceraids

Maybe on pol

Lots of old european towns have height limit on buildings to keep the old city skyline and don't ruin it with towers of steel and glass.

It's to my understanding that Paris has height restrictions in place due to the maze of catacombs under the city. They fear the weight of the building may cause the ground to collapse. I may be wrong.

>You do it for the same penis enlargement motives.
Are the Deutsch really in a place to criticize others for that?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Gustav

Churches were and should always the tallest buildings in a city you degenerate

Just look at this shit, it would look utterly ridiculous.

Attached: skyscrapers.jpg (2717x1528, 3.22M)

>Why don’t Europeans build tall skyscrapers like America?

Because we are not savages, mostly.

why are you so obsessed with the shard

compare it to the laktha center, which is the tallest skyscraper in europe

Attached: _methode_times_prod_web_bin_fae74e30-5d5b-11e9-a6bc-0b6ddba9ef5d.png (944x634, 845.85K)

>Europeans live much denser
you fell for the california bugman fantasy projection?

you dont need to inject your hyperspecialized interest into this convo, aspie

Every big city I've been to, it's always a tourist destination to climb to the top of of of these towers of babel. Seems like it'll be neat to get such a birds eye view, until you realize that you're fighting with chinks to see nothing but more city sprawl.

Being at ground level is like walking in a trash filled cave full of freaks. Get that shit outta my sunlight.

Attached: tenor.gif (314x238, 1.81M)

that would look cool AF

looks comfy desu

We have some skyscrapers but they are located in Paris (Montparnasse Tower) and aren't very tall.

I believe our governments never wanted to ruin landscapes with ugly ass concrete totems, especially when there is no real need for it.

lol

What's the point of them really? They are mostly used for offices and bugmen tier apartments. Never understood the appeal.

Idk man, now that I see it I think it could work. Medieval-punk. Humble peasants traveling to the castle to tend to their offices.
You could even have hostile take overs ala the Meaning of Life

That's not Paris. Here's your (You).

because it would take away from their cultural architecture.

If they could build it big and keep a cultural look to it, why not?

Chicago is a fucking swamp, but there is always bedrock, just gotta drill deeper. All of these skyscrapers are supported on bedrock, and some of them have foundations that go through weak bedrock to find solid bedrock. The limitation are municipalities.

Attached: 154.jpg (2717x1528, 974.51K)

THIS

Attached: iu-1.jpg (1100x618, 78.58K)

Cool? COOL? It looks like someone has plonked down, right in a beautiful scene, two giant dildos of the sort of size you would use to fuck your own ass.

There's nothing cool about it, they're glass fronted abominations.

Attached: Jacob_van_Swanenburg_-_The_Harrowing_of_Hell.jpg (1390x957, 1.71M)

because they are eyesores and vulgar...

Attached: 1_z9qolECuZ7VwnaBAnKegWQ.jpg (696x466, 50.43K)

We don’t need fucking skyscapers. Even smaller cities in Europe have their own identity which makes them recognisable from others. Cities here also aren’t overcrowded. Skycrapers are desinged to hold more place in smaller areas. Usually they don’t look good, even if they do, they’re nothing compared to real architecture.

Attached: BF2240FF-5C7D-42E9-8D32-9AAAC7115470.jpg (2000x1250, 493.36K)

Exactly, the most subhuman country in the industrialized world does it too.

Take a look at the Wikipedia link, retard.

No interest in building ugly tall buildings with 200 floors wherein people live like bugs in overpriced flats. Shame on you.

There is no reason for them other than stupid city planning and using them as ego monuments. Most Europeans had very little interest in such crap.

The only beautiful skyscrapers are the old ones in Chicago and some in south Manhattan.
The new buildings made from glass and other terrible materials, are cold and nouveau riche

Attached: chicago-board-of-trade.jpg (550x440, 81.66K)

Yeah, it's definitely not geology

Attached: no.jpg (512x322, 51.63K)

I d rather we go back to our traditional building styles and drop the commie blocks with hospital like interiors. I swear to God all the new buildings from Portugal to Estonia and from Greece to france look the same in and out

Attached: maramures northern romania.jpg (800x531, 86.54K)

Modern skyscrapers are ugly blocks anyway. No point in building them in European cities, as it would detract from their aesthetics. Pic related is probably the best you can make a skyscraper look.

Attached: Empire state building.jpg (846x1270, 1.08M)

Same. Aside from view you live like a bugman in one. It’s just build a tower cause you can. Became like a contest for some people like usa. And arabs and others start Hiring people to do same and china and several others. Always trying to built slightly higher tower and spending so much Money on it that you can barely afford to live in it.

dont eurocities have a huge problem with sewer systems right now?

And still pretty ugly. You should destroy every building, deport every single non-white, and create a real European country.

Where is this

>wanting more glass and steel cube cancer

Berlin is swamp.

I hear you, but this guy is right: old school skyscrapers ftw. Even better are old school style, like this art deco masterpiece in Singapore. Ugly glass shoe-boxes are an abomination.

Attached: Parkview_Square ca 2002.jpg (1200x1600, 475.29K)

France of course

Americans have no self-awareness regarding how obnoxious they are

It's not just about architecture, it's also about the skyline.
How the hell do you put a skyscraper here without ruining the whole view?

Attached: image-rom.jpg (2048x1536, 890.99K)

Places like berlin cant. They would would literally sink. Also, it would be a huge undertaking, europe is old as fuck prime real estate is expensive or probably a heritage site. And zoning laws prohibit it.

Also, there is no need.

Eurocope thread