Macron to meet with docteur Raoult

“...we didn’t follow our patients when they went to the ICU...”. Run that by a Med Student. See what they have to say.

He may have been highly respected once but one piece of trash can “harm your reputation”.

Speak English you gayfaggot

Do you have any objections with its hypotheses or the manner it has been presented?

Que est escrito en isso twit? Faggot

Apparently the editors of the JIAA had a number of problems. The Guardian wrote an article on this yesterday. One problem is how do you claim 100% when “we didn’t follow our patients in the ICU”. Ask a med student what would happen if he played that card on rounds with the Chairman. He’d be looking for a new profession is what.

So the issue you have is entirely with the formalities of the paper itself and not the mechanical functions its hypothesizes. Thanks and your very interesting sage is noted.

Macron takes it up the ass from migrant camp niggers.

If you want to make a claim the research you present should support that claim. Eliminating the sickest patients is “cheating” to say the least. That should give any one pause when they read that.

Stay cool don't drool macaroni

See if you can find yesterday’s article. I read it yesterday. On their web page but the one they have today is “Today’s” obviously.

I get that you take issue with the formalities present in the research. Do you have any issues with the mechanism that it hypothesizes? Is there any part of it that doesn't make sense to you?

My concern is I have yet to see a clinical report that demonstrates a reduction in mortality. A review of cases of 20,000+ seriously ill or dead could do that. That paper could be written this morning. Where is it? My guess is there are plenty of people in there that WERE taking Plaquenil prior to all this and THAT is why we aren’t hearing about it. And as the days go by it is more obvious every day.

To my memory that people with lupus have done well against the Chinese Virus has been noted. As well as deaths featuring surprisingly few smokers.

theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/06/hydroxychloroquine-trump-coronavirus-drug

Here you go. Read it. Then get back to me.

Is Onfray still a thing ?

Macron laxative drugs

Attached: etude7.jpg (1920x1080, 343.43K)

Done reading. Emotional blather that begged me for a dollar like a crackhead. Presented no scientifically rooted reason to doubt the hypotheses and harped on forever about how the study was incomplete.
Honestly made it seem interesting enough to complete the study.

...and having that fraud, a fucking LAWYER wearing a White Coat chiming he was associated with Stanford looks pretty slimy, too, by the way.

Attached: 1585654298258.jpg (538x545, 32.53K)

clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01417403

hydroxychloroquine could make cells more vunerable to radiation. Trump and chabad jews around him pushing hydroxychloroquine and 5g at the same time is pretty suspicious.

The fact the IJAA wouldn’t publish his paper is a big clue IMHO.

So you're trusting a board of editors over scientists. That isn't very scientific.

Good for France! Bill Gates for prison

>the gaurdian
>ctrl f
>no mention of zinc
discarded.

Here's a real source
>techstartups.com/2020/04/06/more-doctors-are-seeing-success-with-hydroxychloroquine-and-zinc-sulphate-in-treating-coronavirus-patients/
>abc7news.com/coronavirus-drug-covid-19-malaria-hydroxychloroquine/6079864/

Dude. The Editors don’t get to be editors without being “peers”. That is sort of what the word “peer reviewed” means. Look at the Journal of Infectious Disease. Check their “editors”. You might notice they are all or mostly “Chairman of Inf. Dis. At Mass Gen or Johns Hopkins.

Are frog doctors not required to bathe?

Let me guess. SERMO? World One? And you want to talk about “Science” right?

Here. Let me do it for you. academic.oup.com/jid/pages/Editorial_Board

You posted the fucking Guardian dumbass.
I'm not saying that any conclusive answer is available. I want to know why you think that's a reason to disengage with further experimentation with the principles it introduces.

Those are Raoult’s peers. I don’t see them running to his defense. The IJAA won’t publish his study although HE presented his “study” as “Submitted to IJAA for peer review”. Well they did and threw it in the trash.

You are putting words in my mouth. So now you are debating with yourself.

Name calling is always highly successful as well.

this changes everything.

So you're down with shoving air tubes down people's throats. There's more anecdotal evidence that treating the syndrome as the flu than that the HCQ angle is an outright fraud.

I guess this ain’t going like you thought it might. Check the “talking points”. See if there is some guidance.

Well, if YOU want to change the subject...

No, I wouldn’t further traumatize an already stiff lung with even higher PEEP. No ECMO and Fluosol, that’s would be quite different.

Nothing in your talking points about Fluosol?

So far your basic argument that its bad because they rejected the paper and because of a the guardian article, not because of the contents of the paper. A paper can be rejected for any number of reasons, and just because the paper was rejected does not necessarily mean it's wrong.

Remember YOU asked me “So what do you want to do...?”

The editors EXPLICITLY stated “...does not meet our standards...”

So now you want to switch back from “What would you do?” That was fast.

"Does not meet our standards" could mean anything.

At this point you should suggest to your bosses that they should amend the talking points, “Quit talking about Raoult.”

So he can tell Raoult to shut his mouth.

When it is accompanied by a Rejection Notice it really means just one thing.

Exactly. You can have an 18 inch cock standard if you want.

isac.world/news-and-publications/official-isac-statement

It really would be wise.

You know Yas Forums has IDs right?

>just call
nah, sometimes you have to talk to a man face-to-face to know whether he's full of shit or for real.

Does it look like I care?

It looks like you're a nigger

Absolute kek. Based wizard summoning emanuelle maricon instead of the other way around.

Attached: laugh.gif (377x372, 3.46M)

yay! let's let people die because we're not 100% sure this shit does what it looks like it does.

How is this twin strawman ever an argument in your head

Ah, name calling. The Final Coup deGrace of the MasterDebater.

It's okay, you frogs just need to eat some fish tank cleaner and you'll be fine

You asked me a question. I gave you an answer. There is no name calling here nigger.

Am I screwing up your PsyOp?

No it looks like you're replying to the wrong person.

Based white wizard making leftie niggers seethe. His treatment helps and research journals scientific formalities won't stop it from working.

I guarantee you Manu is full of shit, Some things you just know.

Attached: 31123857237.jpg (225x225, 7.95K)

Tucker really should be apologizing for having that shyster in the white coat on his show. But he won’t. Because Tucker can’t be wrong. In his mind.

Kiddie Diddler Raoult lied to everyone for fame and now he's going to prison for it. At least now can shut the fuck up about an untested drug that causes heart arrhythmias.

Attached: image.png (1000x1000, 328.36K)

you're a terrible shill. you'll have to work harder to earn your remdesivir bux.

The proposed treatment may work. Right now there is no evidence it does and so far every attempt to make the claim is crap. This just increases the suspicion that it IS crap.

When you have an important scientific discovery, you submit it to the Journal and let THEM go the the TV studio. That way you don’t look like a damn fool when it gets rejected.

Nobody likes you. Stay in your containment thread, /cvg/ doomer.