Some faggot on Yas Forums posted this without any context and then 50 other faggots bumped the thread without any context. I imagine this shit came from here. So maybe one of you faggots knows something about it, but probably not. This entire site is cancer now.
Came from /x/, nobody can say whether the floaty things are fake or not. Somebody pretty much pointed out how'd the person recording would know to zoom in at that point, so it all leads to it being fake. Good camera though
Eli Davis
Those are the reptilians' craft, they're known for the cigar shapes. They recently blew up a comet heading towards Earth.
You're welcome, warmies.
Jackson Stewart
Clearly a shop but fuck I am ready
Leo Lee
fake
Aaron Fisher
It’s cheese
Gavin Garcia
>Somebody pretty much pointed out how'd the person recording would know to zoom in at that point, so it all leads to it being fake. Good camera though Maybe they saw it before. How long would it take for those things to orbit?
The easier way to test this is if someone could calculate if this orbit is even possible given the distance from the moon, speed and the moon's gravity.
These are all known factors and someone with slightly better math skills than me can easily figure this out. This is the silver bullet that a computer animator would overlook.
and atmospheric effect stopped at 0:34, so most likely CGI
Adam Morales
Oh shit, did LINK moon again?
A LINK just flew over my moon!
Nolan Rodriguez
>The easier way to test this is if someone could calculate if this orbit is even possible given the distance from the moon, speed and the moon's gravity. It's absolutely not, they're moving far too fast. Look at the size, these would have to be hundreds of kilometers long each, and they cover their own length several times per second. Moon's escape velocity is 2.38 km/s. They couldn't possibly be in orbit, they're travelling at least 2 orders of magnitude faster than escape velocity, probably 3 or even more - I'm making a very rough, very conservative guess on their size.
Hunter Howard
>what is this? exceptional CGI/knowledge of astronomical physics but still artificial and homosexual
the atmospheric distortion is just a post processing filter that mysteriously stops after the last cgi ufo vanishes into the shadow. desu this video is very well made and almost got me.
Christian Smith
it's fake shite, that's what
Lincoln Sullivan
Its fake, the shadow lines were apparently fucked or something according to a visual graphics user who posted about this in a thread from couple days back.
Lincoln Scott
underrated
Ryan Harris
my excellent video IQ and experience tells me its real but I haven't studied it long, what needs to be observed are the shadows, the physics of the shadows are the key, and check if the shadows are dancing around relative to the moons surface just like how the whole video has some small vibration, if the shadows are not vibrating and they seem to align with physics its a bingo, the person zooming tot he top quarter of the moon is no indicator of anything
Ian Bell
Some local 58 bullshit?
Ayden Allen
lunar wave crow_777
Mason Powell
Bear in mind, they arent even orbiting. The center of the orbit has to pass through the center of the body being orbited. That is, the orbit has to cross the equator exactly twice (unless the orbit is equatorial). This orbit looks circular in the plane of the equator, but above the equator. Impossible.
Now, if they were moving under power, sure, but why?
Nathan Gray
It's CGI. You got this shit from reddit. It's not fucking real. Jesus christ the amount of low IQ faggots here these days
Nicholas Ramirez
fpbp
Thomas Davis
i'm too lazy to find the link but it's a fake you can see distortion from cgi
Camden Long
Make peace with the fact that the moon is a forward operations base for many civilizations and terra humans have lunar operations post (L.o.p)1& 2 there and have had it since the 50s.
Jackson Ortiz
its fake is what it is.
Mason Ramirez
i recant, the atmospheric distortion suddenly stops after the ufos, wow
Dominic Phillips
last night when I was looking at the sky there was a cluster of lights barely visible under the brightest star in the sky and they would shoot off 1 by 1 across the sky then disappear. I thought it might be the starlink satellites or whatever.
Connor Morris
because they dont need to conserve energy because of some sort of great reactor or other ethereal energy source, but anyway its fake because the atmospheric distortion suddenly stops
Wyatt Scott
ok time for drunk autism
1,737.5km radius for moon
Moon roughly 800p tall on first frame, 2.171 km/pixel
Crater 16p tall on first frame
Crater roughly 50p tall by appearance of objects
3.125x zoom factor
0.69km/pixel at full zoom
shadow of upper object 8x6p at 0:22 (stretches later as object approaches horizon of sun), object is roughly the same size, top object is at absolute minimum 5km on longest dimension and it's coming at us head on at this point
moved 22 pixels in 4 seconds, from 0:22 to 0:26
15.8 km/s, 3 times escape velocity
actual figure far higher because we're assuming static plane but it's approaching from a horizon
yet it still moves over the horizon as if it was in orbit
so either it's doing whack maneuvers to maintain what LOOKS like an orbit at frankly absurd speeds, or it's fuckin fake
still cute anyway, whoever made it clearly got the shading really good and just did a phenomenal job overall, they just didn't think out the math and scale
also yeah they forgot to continue atmospheric distortion like said
Grayson Russell
moon is 17 miles away and hollow, you can literally fly a jet there, those are gravity propelled vehicles, bringing the few inhabitants to the dark side so they can bang with the lights out
All that text and all you had to say was they are ultra faggots
Adam Mitchell
I've seen this before but with an older timestamp
Brody James
Well yeah, and if the radius of the moon is 1079mi then either those ships are several miles large each or they are much closer to earth than the moon.
Bentley Reyes
Take the 42 pill
Robert Barnes
You can somewhat fake this by placing a piece of glass in front of the camera, then twisting or moving it into an angle that reflects some other light sources outside of the picture, they will be imposed on the image and you wouldn't notice the trick, not even with proper software. I can't explain the shadows casted on the objects though, wtf.