>I would guess around 250,000 max
weak numbers.
Society can continue easily without those 250k degenerates dying.
Its very accurate guys
Nathaniel Bailey
Lucas Thomas
I dont disagree
I think the damage on the economy and populations willingness or unwillingness to stay locked down for so long is more worrying
Samuel Powell
Nope but I did follow his prep advice. Stock market volatility too unpredictable at the moment
Joshua Ramirez
Open the page in desktop view
Benjamin Sullivan
This comment deserves its own thread
Parker Morris
John Anderson
>I actually meant to
>still doesn't post the god damn fucking link
imperial.ac.uk
faggot
Samuel Young
We don’t have one because we don’t need one, idiot.
A SARS treatment was created at the time, but ended up having bad side effects.
This is why a COVID-19 treatment will need a years worth of tests before it is available for use.
Aaron Carter
So this guy summarizes the paper and seems to like to impress with bigly numbers.
But where's part that proves that that particular model used is indeed the valid model of the natural phenomenon in question?
Gavin Smith
It all comes down to the vaccine and ID2020. This is why they hate hydroxychloroquine. If HCQ + antibiotic works as a cure or near-cure then it negates the need for a vaccine (which they could put god knows what else into). We need to devote serious effort to treatments.