Coronavirus - 0.02% Death Rate

Trump says 1.6 Million tested so,
>1.6 million tested
>336k positive
>virus has had about 5 months since first case in USA to spread
>"more infectious than flu"
>flu season lasts six months; gets to ~60 million
So that means at LEAST 50 MILLION should be infected in America at this very moment.

Consider now the what, 10k dead? To 50 million infected? It's nothing. In fact, it's 0.02%, as I have predicted in many prior posts.
/CVG/ BTFO, meme virus BTFO, happening cancelled.

Attached: 1586064445977.jpg (750x777, 126.41K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=K4I1YTXn6hk
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Mission accomplished more like. The dollar is saved. USA USA USA

For this to be true, the tests would have to be random. They aren't. People ask to be tested.

corona ain't stopping, just taking a quick breath

youtube.com/watch?v=K4I1YTXn6hk
youtube.com/watch?v=K4I1YTXn6hk
youtube.com/watch?v=K4I1YTXn6hk

You're spouting the same shit that those theoretical epidemiologists said a few weeks ago.

Theoretical epidemiology isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

Still way larger regardless.
Harmless little flu.

You are severely retarded.

That's all /cvg/ is, theories mixed with delusion

Attached: 1347577663367.jpg (317x699, 181.35K)

POO POO PEE PEE
DIARRHEA CHECK PLEASE
GET BACK TO WORK REEEEEE

Attached: 1585589182679.png (300x299, 123.13K)

Project harder, you don't seem to understand what's going on here little guy.

>Still way larger regardless.
Prove it.

>implying all coronavirus deaths have been properly identified
>somehow a smaller percentage makes 10K deaths (so far) less significant

Smug brainlet with a computer thinks he's smarter than everyone because he deals in low-level abstraction with no understanding of higher level concepts or real-world connections

Are you actually this retarded?

>muhh hidden deaths
B U L L S H I T

Attached: 1586053287693.jpg (901x818, 125.77K)

>6 months
>Jan->April

Hmmmm. Holy shit retard

Not an argument.

Nice reading comprehension memefag. I'm guessing you're from some sandnigger country, am I right?

>pretends deaths is the only relevant metric because we have unlimited healthcare capacity and resources

Again, smug brainlet doesn't comprehend the big picture.

Yes retard, the virus is only as big as the numbers on the screen say and couldn't possibly be larger. And it's more infectious than flu, still couldn't possibly be larger.

>2 MORE WEEKS GUYZ. 40% DEATH RATE

>big picture
The fiction in your head can't be seen by others, you insane retard.

>the virus is only as big as the numbers on the screen say and couldn't possibly be larger
It could be, but how do you know whether it's 2x larger or 1,000x larger? You don't. You're a LARPing faggot making conjecture.
>it's more infectious than flu
Prove it.

>>it's more infectious than flu
>Prove it.
Sorry, misread this part. I agree with you there, but this virus hasn't been around nearly as long as the flu, so obviously it hasn't infected as many.

R

Not an argument

Attached: Screenshot - 2020-04-05T072211.971.png (1068x628, 154.43K)

Neither was your response, flaming faggot. Don't apply standards to me you can't meet yourself, you monumental moron.

Attached: 1366951858238.gif (250x188, 1.95M)

Flu season is ~6 months in USA
Coronavirus patient #1 in USA was about 4-5 months ago.
More infectious = should be way bigger already

LOL
Do you actually think the amount of people with the flu goes to zero outside of flu season? You're an actual fucking downie, this is hilarious.

Strawmen are not arguements you absolutely retarded copefag.
How assblasted can you be?

Correct.
Missing the point.
Alarming amounts of cope.

I didn't make a strawman, you're comparing a finished outbreak during some downtime to a virus that just recently got to this country. There aren't zero flu cases outside of flu season like there were zero coronavirus cases not too long ago, which means the flu doesn't have to start from scratch. What the hell is wrong with you? Are you old enough to browse this board?

See: ()
This shit is incredibly simple, how embarrassing that you can't understand it.

>muhh so much more infectious than flu
>b..but it isn't way bigger cause that ruins my agenda!!!

also friendly reminder that H1N1 had a 17% death rate initially, then we found all the cases; guess what, it was 0.02%.
This is gonna be the same shit.

>"Don't worry, user, that car coming our way in high speed isn't gonna run us over - just look close to it there's another car parked even closer to us and that hasn't run us over yet!"
Prove it.

You just proved nothing, stop telling people to prove things when you can't do it yourself.
The absolute state of cuckrona shills

>You just proved nothing
Prove it.

This is why all the data on /cvg/ is bullshit.
The inability to face reality, you're literally a child.

Everybody is at home and taking extreme precautions to not get sick. I would expect to see all sickness numbers to be way down.

Prove it.

It sure is odd how everyone is being told we're going to need to stay locked down and out of work for months, probably need to start wearing masks everywhere, can't be in groups of more than 5-10, and yet the people giving these orders
>keep holding press conferences and q&a sessions in rooms filled with reporters
>Stand right next to each other on stage or when giving interviews
>Don't wear masks at any point during all this, even King Chipper himself
They know what's best for us, let's all just flatten the curve and social distance and avoid exponential growth and whatever other catchphrase we need to keep repeating, and go back to sleep

Seething little baby.

Attached: 1581815940979.jpg (785x731, 75.92K)

>B-but it's so much worse than the flu!!!!

>Seething little baby.
Prove it.

I have no idea if it is worse or not, but it is certainly changing the world. I find these times pretty exciting, despite being economically scary.

Attached: 1504652104101.jpg (390x365, 22.9K)

>1.6 million tests
>countless videos of empty test centers
they are just letting everyone die at home and reporting faux numbers in hope to sleep it out and get the population back to work

Attached: 1585413957803.jpg (1268x968, 105.99K)

kek

The damage is already done

Yes, I am BTFO. The death rate is irrelevant at this point. At any rate it's ridiculously contagious and fills hospitals and kills by sheer numbers.

>corona ain't stopping, just taking a quick breath
you lose gates

>flu
>millions of people are currently sick with the flu at any given time
>still takes 6 months to get 60 million during "flu season"
>coronavirus
>didn't infect humans until 4-5 months ago
>had to start of with 100 some people
>infected 300k in the span of about 3 months

ok shill.

I would lve to see this data from other countries.

Just wait two more weeks.. and then the chaos will happened..

trump was right

Logic and math elude you

Why did the Chinese weld people in their homes and do all that bullshit then?

Nothingburger dumbfucks gonna dumbfuck 'til the end, kinda gotta respect that.

Attached: corast.png (599x307, 39.05K)

The flu doesn't kill young people without other diseases.
The flu isn't infectious and deadly enough to overwhelm healthcare systems worldwide
The flu doesn't make young people need ventilators for prolonged periods of time, causing said healthcare systems to crash.

So, no, the mortality rate being low wouldn't change a thing about the current situation.

retard

See the H1N1 numbers for the US, less than half is confirmed deaths, everything else is estimated.
The same goes for the flu, the hueg number you see quoted everywhere is the estimation, not the amount of lab confirmed deaths.

Now go put a new brain inside your head.

This. The spanish flu would have killed everyone except remote tribes of indigenous people in parts of africa/SE asia and south America if we had intercontinental travel in less than the time it takes for someone to be seriously ill from something like this

People got thrown overboard as sharkbait if they showed signs of illness in the 1500s.

And SARS had a 3% mortality rate initially before the 10% mortality rate at the end.

Your argument is invalid.