If Napoleon won, would ww1 and ww2 have been avoided?
If Napoleon won, would ww1 and ww2 have been avoided?
Jason Edwards
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Tyler Phillips
Napoleon was working for (((them)))
Thomas Powell
If... If... If my grandmother had wheels, she would've been a bike...
Tyler Ortiz
Yes but we would have had different wars of French expansion
Nathan Morales
Good conquerors are seldomly good administrators.
Alexander had the same problem.
Noah Sanchez
wtf you talking about, he is the one that unleashed jewish subversion over the world by emancipating them...
he expected them to integrated in society and abandon their ways and tradition, lol, as if they would ever do that. after napoleon came Marx and everything else that followed up to our time.
>he emancipated the Jews and introduced other ideas of freedom from the French Revolution. For instance, he overrode old laws restricting Jews to reside in ghettos, as well as lifting laws that limited Jews' rights to property, worship, and certain occupations.
Brandon Diaz
High IQ post.
Aaron Ortiz
(((They))) were funding both Napoleon and the British. It was a lose-lose situation either way.
Sebastian Reyes
If Napolean subjugated to the Austrian Empire there wouldn't have been any world wars
Aiden Peterson
based Austriapilled
Levi Hall
Lol the whole reason why there was a Revolution in France was because they all were fearing the Big Austrian Cock.
They were paranoid about Austrian power and thought that through marriage we wanted to take over France.
Ethan Hernandez
Is that really the issue or is it just that they spread themselves out too thin and have to contend with an empire with many peoples and ethnicities?
Ayden Harris
That too is a problem. If you make "Frenchness" a major issue of your revolution everyone who is not French might make that issue into a major one as well.
An old school monarchy has it easy - local nobles get jobs in the kingdom and administer it.
But the French wanted to run a super centralized Empire like in ancient times, before nationalism was a thing.
If it wasnt for losing the war it would have imploded on its own, rather quickly at that.
Hunter Williams
The italian is right. There’s no point in debating hypotheticals like this
Isaac Ward
Napoleon died of stomach cancer only a few years after his second time as Emperor. No matter how you work the situation he is gone by 1821. Immediately after his death there would have been political fragmentation and likely a new coalition to overturn Napoleon's work. His son was too young to be a military leader so you get a regency and likely civil war between the Bonaparte brothers trying to take control of France.
Asher Phillips
>French wanted to run a super centralized Empire like in ancient times, before nationalism was a thing.
What is the Ottoman Empire?
Ian Phillips
lel. this
Kevin Diaz
ww1/2 would have been Britain and Russia (perhaps the US as well) fighting against a French dominated continent
Aiden Collins
A la fin de sa vie, Napoléon émit le désir de devenir géologue et de parcourir l'Amérique du nord au sud.
Jose Cooper
(((they))) hate napoleon he beat them at their own game
Ian Foster
Presumably the Ottoman Empire is the Ottoman Empire.
Juan Anderson
Angel Ross
Hudson Phillips
Perhaps, although who is to say WWI wouldn't have been started by other means?
Tyler Gomez
The sick man of Europe.
Bentley Davis
This is now a Republican thread, post anti-monarchy pics.
Cooper Baker
Nathan Morris
Brody Bennett
>and thought that through marriage we wanted to take over
That's where we were good at 2bh
Nathan Walker
He shouldve done that after leaving elba. And conquered the americas in the name of france
Josiah Long
>Napoleon was working for (((them)))
and they would be working for him had he defeated the british, power comes out of the rifle of a gun, not a gold vault
Cooper Bell
Julian Powell
Leo Garcia
imagine having to learn french in school
Xavier Kelly
James Sanchez
It was pretty great. We got to eat French food and watch Amelie, Dinner for schmucks and Mr. Bean’s Holiday.
It’s better than learning Latino Spanish
Grayson Campbell
Je connais cela ressentir
Hudson Ramirez
This.
Diadochs ruin everything.
Jeremiah White
that is a very attractive soldier.
Oliver Cooper
His only weakness was to lead an army of frenchmen.
Gabriel Cook
WW2 happened because Russia was not consecrated to Mary's Immaculate Heart in time.
Adam Gonzalez
Napoleon fought against the anglo... the same people that (((genecided))) native Americans, (((stole))) their land, and profited from (((slavery))).
Levi Miller
>Good conquerors are seldomly good administrators.
Holy shit you fucking brainlets.
Napoleon was famous for being an administrator
We still use laws he made.
Jose Turner
No they just would have had a different cast of characters
Chase Ramirez
Your granny was already a bike.
Owen Jones
Alexander also had that ... special... problem that he came from a very primitive part of the world and was very impressionable, in Greece they called his father who conqured them "barbarian", and Alexander was now thrust into the center of the known world, sees the backwardness of his own home and became so amazed with what he conquered that he essentially became a Persian himself.
Centuries later the Roman aristocracy would still use him as an example of what happens to a realm if a ruler starts acting like an Easterner, meaning yes, you can conquer Egypt, but don't become an egyptian with all that indulgence and god on earth complex.
Dylan Jones
Napoleon was an incredible administrator, much more competent at that, than at actual field tactics.
Most of his success were due to his ability to move large number of mens with supply before his enemy.
There is letter from his hand to organise the smallest thing like horse feeding system or road building.
It doesn't really work for him
Lucas Perez
>prevent war by enslaving everyone and mass looting art
Some foreign power would've just armed the inevitable rebel factions.
>Ottoman Empire
>centralized
>checks flag
Yep, not surprised
Leo Ward
Maybe.
Nevertheless, Napoleon sucked circumcised dicks and they'd plot something to make whites fight anyway.
Napoleon and the Jews (Cuckpedia):
en.wikipedia.org
Jackson Bennett
We gave up the law that allowed a cucked man to kill his wife sadly...
Charles Rogers
We use laws that would be recognizeable to a Roman. The only thing of value you're saying is that your own country is in dire need of a legal reform.
Napoleon firmly believed in nepotism, he might have been good, but he placed lowlifes who happen to be related to him in power and responsibility elsewhere. Joseph Bonaparte in Spain for example. They called it ulcur.
What he acutally needed was to promote local elites who believed in the Napoleonic ideals into power.
Josiah Foster
Yes. Just different teams.
Cooper Thompson
He led an army of surrender monkeys and won tho
Sebastian Davis
Napoleon was undeniably brilliant. However, he badly mismanaged his allies. The idea that he could just invade everyone who traded with Britain was a terrible idea. He managed to turn staunch allies into enemies over nothing. And the policy had basically no effect upon Britain anyway.
Wyatt Lee
>What he acutally needed was to promote local elites who believed in the Napoleonic ideals into power
Which he did alot, see Lannes You cant accuse Jospeh of the spanish shitshow created by the spanish king and his son.
And nepotism is not always bad, his adopted son Eugène was one of the most competent person he could find.
Lucas Gomez
based leafposter
Levi Perry
William Ward
Napoléon wanted to unite Europe, he understand before everyone that the world will be dominated by Continental Empire. Russia, US and China. He was our very last chance to not being cucks. WWI and WII were European civil. Push by the kikes, Wall Street and City to destroy the capacity of Europe of being a threat.
William King
>Napoleon
>Anti Monarchy
Isaiah Cox
No
Elijah Collins
>don't become an egyptian with all that indulgence and god on earth complex
Isn't that the downfall of Mark Antony?