Untitled
Other urls found in this thread:
ine.uaf.edu
youtube.com
files.wtc7report.org
ae911truth.org
cem.uaf.edu
youtube.com
twitter.com
Holy shit was Q right? Fuck me, lost that bet.
bump
>19 years later
i knew it was bullshit then and at least now the truth is coming out
t. civil engineer
>april 1
>Holy shit was Q right? Fuck me, lost that bet.
was q even born before 2001?
bruh
This is just confirmation of what everyone already knew.
Will there be justice or any sort of ramifications?
Almost certainly no.
>not-destroyed-fires
duh
so structural damage from two massive buildings collapsing right next to it.
Did the report conclude it was destroyed by Israel?
What is news punch?
April 1st?
I didn't need a report to confirm what I already know. What I want is the full video of what hit the Pentagon, not the 2 blurry frames from the security booth.
nope
WTC1 & 2 didnt do any meaningful structural damage to WTC7. even if they had it wouldnt have caused that mode of collapse.
daily reminder that the BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) announced live on air that the building had collapsed before it actually happened..
th-this?
>fag site
>links to conspiracy site
>links to pdf
Where's the university's article on their own publication? Where's their article from when they chose to undertake this investigation, preferably archived from the time?
Anybody with eyes could see it fell exactly like a controlled demo building does
>What hit the Pentagon
Our childhoods along with our hopes and dreams.
it has to be that, the other explanation is controlled demolition but why.
destruction of evidence
Wtf... I think half of America came to this conclusion like a month after it happened.
This study took 4 years to determine... Did they not watch the video on YouTube? They could have determined that in 4 minutes.
Close but no
Insurance money.
wrong, the giant fucking antennae fell on WTC 7 doing lots of damage.
with that being said, it was still destroyed by explosives.
Larry even said they had to "pull it".
Why not both?
I talked to a guy who was on the far side of the Pentagon when "whatever" hit the coincidentally under construction part of it. He said he lost 2 friends/acquaintances in that attack. When I questioned whether it was actually the commercial plane they said it was he got defensive and started deflecting. I think he didn't want to face the cognitive dissonance.
>there can only be one reason
Wow, the CIA really fucked up this time.
>“The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”
So, controlled demolition...
9/11 is above CIA's pay grade. It was planned by the kind of people who use CIA safe houses to fuck teenage mistresses.
>It was planned by the kind of people who use CIA safe houses to fuck teenage mistresses
How does one become one of these "kind of people"? Asking for a friend.
Brainlet
was the third tower even on fire?
I agree
bump
The NIST Report said it wasn't caused by structural damage from debris. They specifically said fire caused it. But left out key structural components in their mòdels just to get it to collapse. Evèn then, the building didn't collapse symmetrically in the models.
It's worth at least mentioning that insuring them against terrorist attack isn't a terrible idea since there had been a terrorist attack on them before that.
>“The only way it could have fallen in the observed manner is by the near-simultaneous failure of every column.”
Wooooow, no shit. Dancing Israelis. Never forget 9/11.
>PULL IT
>they pulled the building
No shit sherlock
bump for justice
wow this is a real happening
200 million deaths by 2025, believe it now?
Old news. I saw it live. I saw flames coming out the windows of WTC 7. I saw firefighters trying to quell those fires. The rubble from the towers collapsed and dished out the opposite side of WTC 7. At a certain point during that day the news said the firefighters we're pulling out because it was a very stressful day. Larry Silverstein said "Pull it" in an interview meaning to pull all the firefighters out and just let WTC 7 burn because it was near impossible to stop the fires and save all the government files contained within. Then I saw WTC 7 collapse on the news. WTC 7 was literally scooped out into a horseshoe shape and collapsed on all its exposed foundations when nothing behind it was supporting anything. That's why it looked like a controlled demolition from the front which it wasn't.
Im not even dignifying revisionist fag here with a response but I will bump a second time.
Sticky this, for once stop sucking the cock of Satan 4channel moderators.
So the building was pre-wired for detonation, or it was some kind of scalar energy weapon.
Like the Harley t-shirt guy who saw the planes hit the buildings and immediately knew how they fell?
Remember kids, if one building was pre-wired for demolition, they all were.
Whooaaa something we knew the day after the attack is made public but at least it came out quickly with little time to get story straight
WTC 7 was demolished, nobody is denying that. No conspiracy here
Duh, there was no smoke.
Still waiting faggot
I've seen it crumble dozens of times but someone posted a video on her the other day that was my first view of the explosion blowing out windows floor to floor before it collapsed
Hehehehe simpler then you think kiddo
>meaningful structural damage
>antenna fell on it
i just... you are a tard.
You fucking mellinials can't do shit for yourselves.
>newspunch
never eard ov it
energy weapons are disinfo to make us look like schizos.
9/11 was a controlled demolition. Covid 19 is a controlled pandemic.
Repeat after me, kids. Controlled demolition.
Dude all I had to do was look at that shit to come to the same conclusion. What does it matter? If the whole thing was a false flag, 80% of people wouldn't believe it anyway. Just give up. Get chipped and get rekt. All hail the NWO.
Also, this is the person in charge of the study: cem.uaf.edu
admittedly, its clever, yet frustrating, to hide legitimate evidence findings on April 1. Means the MSM wouldn't be looking for it. And it would go past a lot of peoples heads unless they were actively looking for it.
Nope. This guy saw it all and says it was structural damage and fire. /s
I don't have time for other than this:
Lawyers 9/11 Inquiry
Google and ye shall see the truth.