Even Iran had 5G activated in 2019.
All countries that suffer sky-high casualties had 5G activated.
Do not underestimate the power of radio-waves.
Reminder, 5G antennas are actually phased array antennas, just like the crowd control microwave-weapon, it operates at 60ghz just like the phase array directed energy weapon.
Pic related for oxygen absorption at 60ghz
Shit is real, shit is scary
Muh 5G.
Israelis need to be fucking slaughtered.
5g dosnt use that wavelenght because if it did the fucking radio wave would just get absorbed by nearby air and wouldnt get anywhere.
also corona has nothing to do with radio communication its a virus
They are are using those as band pass filter.
Lower the frew makes a 0, increasing it past that make a 1.
Reminder, the 60ghz signal is only sent from tower to tower view a directed wave guide antenna and no human every comes into contact with the 'beam'/radiation unless they go out of their way to climb a tall object in between two towers...and even this is a 0.0001% chance due to the way towers are laid out...fucking idiots
>5g dosnt use that wavelenght because if it did the fucking radio wave would just get absorbed by nearby air and wouldnt get anywhere.
It actually does, but see here Only fucking idiots who haven't done barebone research thinks this will impact people...also, it's clear all the schizos on pol don't understand the inverse square law
Take meds schizo.
>Do not underestimate the power of radio-waves.
This is true.
bump
Big if jew
if you overlay a U.S map of 5G coverage with a U.S. map of Covid outbreak, they mirror each other.
really ? why the fuck would they not just use a different frequency ?
i did a little work with radio as a sat operator and we mostly used Ka\Ku for command\telemetry, pretty sure avoiding the O2 absorption band was the main reason.
>inverse square law
ah yes, that pesky problem...
makes perfect sense, 5G is deployed first in densely populated areas and densely populated areas are where pandemics spread fastest.
>5g doesn't use that wavelength
>the name is just a coincidence goy.
I am sorry, but you were always retarded and it's not related in any way to this new technology.
well def jew so fucking big
what do you mean ? its named 5g because its the 5th generation phone communication standard. the name is coincidence with what ?
Do you realize how much power you will need to emit such electromagnetic waves? the scale of the emitter should be in thousands of kilometers, and i have not see any such device aside HAARP.
>really ? why the fuck would they not just use a different frequency ?
because while using 60ghz severely disrupts it's range, it makes it basically immune to to interference so if you up the power, you get a near flawless connection unlike any other band
t. optical physicist
Riddle me this 5g-conspiracy-fags. How the fuck will the ruling elite protect themselves from these waves if they are everywhere huh? Will they have some sort of secret bio mechanical implants to repel 5g waves while the commoners suffer? Right..
That's how you know its not harmful, because the ruling elite have no way of protecting themselves against it and will be equally exposed. And in that case whats the point?
do you mean because nothing else uses it because its the O2 absorption band ?.
also 5G really has tower to tower RF communication ? did 4G not have this ?
isnt the whole point of a phased array that you can steer the beam ? you can have certain phones send telemetry back to the antenna about how much radio they receive in each band and have the antennas steer the beams away to reduce transmission to specific people.
im not radio expert but im pretty sure this is technically doable.
Would you like to make another attempt to make sense?
Why the fuck would they use a frequency that's mostly absorbed by the atmosphere for either a telecommunication system or a weapon? This shit is just retarded.
The elite doesn't meddle with the riff raff, they only attack big cities while they live in reclusive alpha neighborhoods. Are you even trying jew chill?
>t. retarded jew
50 ghz shlomo
I thought you ashkenaz were supposed to be smart
Living on huge country estates remove from any of it, retard!
5g is 60ghz
>do you mean because nothing else uses it because its the O2 absorption band ?.
Basically this, and there is very little background radiation at 60ghz. If you throw up a high power tower, then you can communicate tower to tower for a few miles without having to dig miles of fiber lines to connect networks.
I know pol wont believe me, since Im an expert on this subject and telling the truth, but the only people who have anything to worry about with 5g are people climbing towers or if somehow a tower's directional antenna gets offset towards the ground/buildings (but there are auto shut off failsafe mechanisms on the 0.001% likelihood of this occuring)
Yes, the FIVE G is in fact SIX G. The same numbers of gorillions of your kind whom where slaughtered in the lolocaust.
>high jew IQ
Comprehensively debunked jewish bullshit!
Oh wow yeah you're totally right. They're going to quarantine themselves in their big mansions in the middle of nowhere forever, never going anywhere in the world anymore just to avoid 5g. And they thought of that themselves? Genius
You are absolutely 100% totally correct and I really cannot understand the extremely forceful resistance and opposition to this plainly evident manifest truth the greed of human beings to advocate for a dangerous technology simply to produce revenue really just makes me wanna poor gasoline on this pandemic
>‘Oh no, we cannot go to the beautiful cities to eat MacDonalds, get stabbed by niggers and get blown up by dune-coons, and are restricted to our princely domains on prime, pristine real estate, where we are delivered the most premium produce year round!’
How fucking stupid are you, cunt?
>Why wouldnt they use a different frequency?
I dont know, jew. You tell me.
5G (fifth generation, aka mm waves, MMW) has been used for decades in the lab to manipulate ion channels in biological membranes.
5g uses everything from 2.5GHz to 70GHz, 5g isnt named 5g because it uses 60 GHz band.
thats pretty neat, every single we used in the space industry had to pierce the entire atmosphere so i never thought of using heavily absorbed frequencies because they're very quiet for short distances.
>worry about with 5g are people climbing towers or if somehow a tower's directional antenna
i dont think the regular antennas have enough power to hurt anyone, i've seen birds set on fire by a radar antenna in the army but that shit had a shitton of power and a whole bunch of N2 cooling trailers.
well the dude explained it, 60 GHz is very quiet and dosnt have interference.
Tell me which elite lives in crowded city apartment
>without having to dig miles of fiber lines to connect networks
fibre lines are the optimal method. Hanging shit off towers is expensive plus mah riggers penalty rates. I said riggers not niggers...
Retard, rich elite still go to the city to visit their multinational offices, they still go to meetings, etc. They don't fucking camp out in their mansions their entire lives.
Thanks for confirming my prejudice, 5g-conspiracy-tards really are the dumbest motherfuckers around
How about US then?
>thats pretty neat, every single we used in the space industry had to pierce the entire atmosphere so i never thought of using heavily absorbed frequencies because they're very quiet for short distances.
That's why they are putting up so many antennas in such short distance from each other compared to normal antennas
>i dont think the regular antennas have enough power to hurt anyone, i've seen birds set on fire by a radar antenna in the army but that shit had a shitton of power and a whole bunch of N2 cooling trailers.
Inverse square law, you only have anything to worry about if you are literally near the output of a directions antenna...and even then, not really a big deal
>fibre lines are the optimal method. Hanging shit off towers is expensive plus mah riggers penalty rates. I said riggers not niggers...
For the coverage they are going for, it's often not practical to dig fiber lines all over a large city
So if I understand correctly it's just that the absorption is high enough that it blocks out noise but low enough that over relatively short distances it still works fine?
Also you brought up the square cube law earlier, so I guess that means it spread in a cone and doesn't travel as a uniform beam? Which makes sense for radio I guess.
Inverse square law, but I guess both are applicable depending what you're looking at.
Maybe you misunderstand the inverse square law? Ever heard of a half-life? How about LED light stimulating neurons through the (apparently opaque) skull?
Just because the signal weakens exponentially with distance and interference doesn't preclude health effects of the comparatively small amount that enters the body. Exacerbating that, skin pores, hair follicles, and sweat glands act as antenna concentrating that "weak" signal into your body.
Everyone, regardless of pro or against 5G is missing extremely relevant variables in their arguments. There are so many important details often ignored.
To name a few:
>Skin pore antennas
>many bands in 5G from 600mhz sites distributed widely, and 60+GHz mmw deployed concentrated in cities.
>radiated power capability(wire gauge, backup genset size, etc) versus specification
>phased and plasma antennas beam forming and concentrating power output.
>3D mapping privacy concerns
>MMW cellsite deployment distance
>So if I understand correctly it's just that the absorption is high enough that it blocks out noise but low enough that over relatively short distances it still works fine?
You are correct on the high enough part. The low enough part isn't actually correct. It's just that it's overcome with very high power transmitters. Think of trying to shine a laser beam 100ft down into water to a receiver, there is no interference but all of the radiation gets absorbed so you have to jack up the power 100x
This review analyzed 94 relevant publications performing in vivo or in vitro investigations. Each study was characterized for: study type (in vivo, in vitro), biological material (species, cell type, etc.), biological endpoint, exposure (frequency, exposure duration, power density), results, and certain quality criteria
Yeah alright that makes sense.
>Maybe you misunderstand the inverse square law?
not in the slightest
>Ever heard of a half-life? How about LED light stimulating neurons through the (apparently opaque) skull?
>Just because the signal weakens exponentially with distance and interference doesn't preclude health effects of the comparatively small amount that enters the body. Exacerbating that, skin pores, hair follicles, and sweat glands act as antenna concentrating that "weak" signal into your body.
>Everyone, regardless of pro or against 5G is missing extremely relevant variables in their arguments. There are so many important details often ignored.
The radiation from the antennas are directional in a wave guide like a beam (not a collimated beam like a laser, but still a directional beam). The beam will never go outside the diameter of the receiving antenna. Cell phones/people will not have 60ghz incident upon them. Your concerns would be valid if that was the case, but is isn't
maybe "global warming" is just increasing atmospheric rf absorption
Blaming it on 5G LOL
It's a component; potentially of of those "more than the sum of their parts" things.
Upstream of your implication, it's been said that all our artificial RF is fucking with bees, insects, birds, trees\vegetation, and other animals. Globally, a decline in pollinators and seed spreaders as well as stress to plant life will reduce free oxygen, and increase co2, methane, NOx, and ozone emissions systemically. (Less new plants, more dying and decomposing. Hydrocarbons from burning and decomposing catalyzes O3 along with sunlight, which signals plants to grow less) To what extent, we'll never know.
>not a Luddite
>not anti-wireless/RF tech
>not an environmentalist.
>Just pro-human life.
I put red rectangles in target 5G freq ranges. Note how close these frequencies are to the water and oxygen absorption peaks. This means they will heat up microenvironments (leaves, microorganisms, etc.) close to the transmitter.
your studies are accurate but do not pertain to the deployment of 60ghz antennas. Take a spectrometer to any area that has a high array of 5g antennas and you will find negligible 60ghz radiation because, as I said before, the 60ghz radiation is directed from antenna to antenna in narrow beams that will never interact with humans unless they climb on a tower
Therapeutic.. or weaponized.
Or you know, damaging cellular DNA and causing cancer.
Hertz is a measure of frequency, we measure wavelengths in metres.
There could be all kinds of reasons why there's a decline in pollinators, why would it have to be RF?
And if 5g is transmitted unidirectionally then is should be less harmful than other sources of RF, presumably.
5G does not go thru walls (but somehow it is more advanced tech lol, that and it needs a pole every 200 ft lol), so the signal needs to be amplified and this is accomplished via multiplexing, which is bouncing the signal off of surfaces and other towers. So, not only does 5G use microwaves (which are considered Very High Frequency waves), they must multiply these waves for EACH user.
Only an absolute chill will deny the 5G pill at this point.
Something I'm not sure of which could be a poignant point with the 'environmentalists': if it ionizes oxygen and water, wouldn't that create ozone and hydroxyl radicals? Ground level ozone is one of the biggest concerns (besides small PM) for those in cities.
While I don't believe ozone or hydroxyls to be NEARLY as dangerous as they're stated to be as pollutants (they're very useful reducing and anti-pathogenic agents), they do still 'burn' the lungs and mucous membranes. Potentially causing chronic inflammation, leading to higher cancer risks. That's just the risks for humans...
Your 60Ghz is wrong, the range is 2.6GHz to about 26 GHz that are proposed to be used.
The air doesn't get ionized, it just absorbs the waves and converts them into heat.