How do I counter the argument that the reason blacks commit more crime is only because of socioeconomics?
How do I counter the argument that the reason blacks commit more crime is only because of socioeconomics?
Poor whites
"modern africans are less advanced than pilgrims from 1650 because... socioeconomics"
Nigs gonna nig
there was an infographic flaoting around that the wealthiest black demographic still commits more crime than the poorest white demographic.
You can't because that's LITERALLY the fucking reason.
This. If poverty caused crime then you would see an equal distribution of crime in poor white neighborhoods in eastern kentucky, and trailer park type living situations.
Thanks bro
Poor whites
Rich blacks commit more crime than the average whites
>ignoring the recent fact that whites commit more mass shootings on average
This is why we will never convince libs of black crime, we keep ignoring obvious factors of white crime
By asking if this means soviet favors jews since they do so well in every metric. If the person then goes on to say that this due to their own merits you can ask why he thinks so for jews but not for blacks.
t. based centrist individualist and disliker of identity politics, bucko
Someone should have the thing where more crime happens in the richest black place in the US than the poorest a white. Bump and keep up the good fight
I saw that at one point but I never thought to save it, would you happen to have it saved?
Show everyone you talk the following picture...they will understand
How do I counter the argument that the reason some people are taller is only because of access to basketball courts.
In fact tall parents are also more likely to have their children exposed to basketball courts.
Blacks are less intelligent and have primitive brains, that's why
What does per capita mean retard?
Statistics aren't evidence of anything anyway. Without theory to back it up, its just a picture.
Do you have sources for this that? I’ve seen in info graphic about that before bu I never saved it
This. There's evidence that rich blacks commit roughly the same crime as poor whites.
the socioeconomics of DNA
You should try to isolate crime across races with similar socio-economic backgrounds. There is no argument. They still underperform.
Ask how come the crime rate isnt as high in poor white areas like west virginia.
This
Per capita means fuck all when you have a sudden surge of a statistic
The cause of crime is not socioeconomics. The cause of crime is niggers.
Practically all their music encourages them to.
It’s not my business to set standards of honesty or industry for non-Whites. That’s their business. I just want them off my people’s turf, out of my people’s territory--all of them.
DNA effects the brain, the brain effects intelligence.
Thanks, I’ve been looking for this info graphic everything
How can you be more disadvantaged, practically speaking, than Paco Garcia Hernandez, the illegal farmhand that makes $7/hour? Legitimately, how can blacks claim they have it worse? Illegals commit way less crime than blacks though.
*infograph
>Bureau of Justice
Oh no, not a mass shooting that totals 1 month of murders in Chicago!
DNA doesn't "effect" the brain. Also, in any given population, genetic differences cancel each other out. Also, intelligence isn't a defined thing, there's different types of necessary intelligence in a community.
Show crime stats for the rich black areas
I mean, it's also a cultural thing, cause ganster culture is trash, but on the other hand, wealth inequality makes it worse too. Rwanda is poor as shit, but their homicide rate is half of the USAs. Malawi is poor as shit, and their total homicide rate is less than that of U.S. White's Firearm homicide rate.
>the same number of killings in 43800 minutes vs 20 minutes
>REEEEEEEEEE GENES ARE NOT REAL OUR IQ COMES FROM THE SOUL
holy shit the lefty religion is so cringe
It’s also due to the disintegration of the nuclear family in America and not specifically the black community. Given that women are financially incentivized to not get married. Then their baby daddies get locked up or die and their children grow up without a proper male role model or father figure. Most of them go to look up to drug dealers and criminals.
the comparison is ppales to oranges though as the white town is a lot more isolated where as the higher crime town is not. While I agree with the concept, the execution is too easily defeated. Chances are high that the Californian town is getting crime from outside of it coming in that is causing the rate to go up.
*more specifically
Look at crime statistics for poor whites?
It's a mix of socioeconomics, race and bad culture that promotes drugs, violence, hedonism etc. Yes, it's true that race affects people behavioral patterns, but imo Yas Forums sometimes takes it too far.
Yeah, I never said socioeconomics had nothing to do with it, it’s just that it’s definitely not only a result of socioeconomics as most people claim.
1 month? You're far too generous. 1 weekend, on average.
Easy compare poor white crime rates to poor black crime rates and point out the fact whites do 50% less even poor.
Our intelligence comes from the means of production and society.
You can't because blacks only commit more crime in America.
>Memeflag tries to argue but doesn't want to stand behind his own argument so he scapegoats someone else
washingtonpost.com
Old study from the mid 60's to the mid 80's.
"In a way, untangling economic and racial inequalities is a chicken-and-egg problem. In criminal justice, though, you can't just explain away the disproportionate rates at which black and Hispanic youths end up in prison by pointing out that many people of color did not grow up with the same economic advantages as their white peers."
Points the authors and uni it came from of the study. It seems his main point is to back it up at the end, but he starts with talking down
affirmative action for poor whites for college entrance exams. Leaves the both questions dangling in the air, with a correction at the bottom for labeling the graphs wrong in a previous version. Probably a politics of the season hit piece by a crazy that never thought people would read it years later.
Left Wapo and now writes daily briefing on politics if you click on his name.
What I want to know is what the hell goes on in Finland that sets off so many Homicides?
>Rape "convictions"
Kek
>it’s definitely not only a result of socioeconomics
Of course not. All I'm saying is that a lot of people on Yas Forums seem to the think it's *only* about race.
I do think things like "racism"/ not feeling welcome in society (whether it's true or not) make people significantly more likely to commit crime as well.
That graph right there, my friend, is definitely a religious/cultural thing more than a racial thing.
What do you mean? You c
Obviously control for race AND income.
If it would show that all races commit crime at a he same level at the same income level then your view would be false. Now this is not the case but you should always let the evidence form your views, not the opposite.
Oh wow, You're proud of that shit? Chicago has a history of violence. Valentines Massacre, Al Capone, tons of gangs since the 1930s.
Explain one of the whitest european countries left, Finland. How come they have 3.3 Homicides per 100k from guns alone every year?
>DNA doesn't "effect" the brain.
WTF?
>Also, in any given population, genetic differences cancel each other out.
So that's why skin color is randomly distributed among every population right?
There was a time before socioeconomics existed, and yet here we are.
>Probably a politics of the season hit piece by a crazy that never thought people would read it years later. Left Wapo and now writes daily briefing on politics if you click on his name.
PHD in Science with a politic obsession just 'mislabeled' a simple graph that in no way impacted his story. Shit if I know if he changed the text later. Also wrote for HuffPost. That is, he could be a quality disinfo agent behind the scenes for a political party effectively on occasion.