Did you know there's a black hole within our solar system?

Did you know there's a black hole within our solar system?

Attached: Screenshot_20200402-214953.jpg (1079x1246, 460.65K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine
solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/hypothetical-planet-x/in-depth/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>may
When that word exists in the headline of a story, you can substitute it for "is not"

I mean, I guess that's possible? Maybe?
What is the actual orbital data that suggests there's something massive out there that we're not seeing?

Cool, let's throw rocks into it and see what happens

>a new theory suggests
what a bunk pile of shit

built for bbc

Cool. Probably not, because we'd've seen gravitational lensing by now.

Space is fake and gay.

Built for bbc

I might have rabbit, I might have.

apparently it would only be a few inches wide, that's not really large enough for lensing to occur

get the fuck out of my board
dumb fucking phoneposter

O cool a jump gate, better plug it up before space niggers come and try and get on welfare

Attached: 1585485328664.jpg (1024x576, 84.73K)

This

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine
I know I know >Wikipedia
I don't have time in me to corroborate more info

I wish a nigga would

Did you know there's a hole at the bottom of the sea?

Some of the objects from the Kuiper belt have very odd orbits that can best be explained by another body really far out.
solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/hypothetical-planet-x/in-depth/

Attached: 1565450135023.jpg (2100x1181, 976.78K)

Fair enough.

Okay, or maybe planet nine is...wait for it...Pluto

O look. Another thing to be afraid of
Top kek

>is not actually be

>theory from January

Black holes, dark matter/energy are fairytale bullshit that were made up to balance our equations used to describe the movement of galaxies, that presume gravity to be the dominant force in the universe, when it is in fact electromagnetism.

Electric Universe/Plasma Cosmology for anyone that wants to know how this reality ACTUALLY works.

there are a ton of objects way outside where they should be (look up sedna) suggesting there's a massive object past the orbit of pluto that's dragging them in it's wake as it moves around.

it's god.

Did you know NASA is fake and gay?

>space is fake
that is all

Attached: 1581740481409.webm (320x240, 2.29M)

black holes aren't real retard

"there may be" /= "there is"

It's probably not a primordial black hole, but if it was, there are more reasons to be afraid of Jupiter, and Jupiter is a pretty chill dude.

Did you know that black women have a black hole in the bottom of their ass?

This, fpbp and /thread

>9th planet
pluto?

Why did I laugh at this

Hopefully there is, might explain all my connection problems at 0030.

pluto isnt a planet nigger

That explains why Pluto is geting smaller

based leaf. day of the rake postponed one day.

Not only is that not true but I don't care. If a black hole was in our solar system it would be sucked in at full force. You are a liar and why are you able to post for a mere 20 dollars?

Attached: 3rdrock.jpg (480x360, 38.27K)

They have found them. Not here though.

Attached: supermassive back hole Messer 87.jpg (1600x900, 68.28K)

I'm scared.

>Planet 9
You mean Pluto?

Gravitational lensing isn't a thing. That's not what gravity is.

Finally an interesting thread

Due to wonky orbits of objects in the kuiper belt they know that there is something out there with about the mass of Saturn pulling things out of position. Though whatever it actually is they have yet to find it.

It's pink on the inside.

its not a black hole and the person who wrote the article is a idiot and a rapist... and possibly a latent homosexual

regardless of size practically if it was sustained it would eat this solar system. the only time thats not applicable is theoretical super low mass black holes formed from a single sub atomic particle overlapping another . in 3d space its like they are occupying the same location practically. on a large scale this wouldnt even be plausible and not be sustained. on a small scale you might get a fraction of a second that its true at cern. its meaningless and john titor is a nigger and a faggot ... and possibly a latent homosexual.

however a sustained black hole in this solar system means death for this planet

More likely their gravitational model is simply wrong. But instead of figuring out how, they invent things like dark matter, Planet 9, and tiny black holes to make the faulty model work.

Attached: neat.gif (633x475, 1.22M)

The smallest confirmed black holes are 3-4 solar masses. Anything smaller is purely hypothetical and unproven. The gravitational influence exerted on the outer solar system is indicative of a large planet, not a star or black hole.

Planet 9 is literally so far from the sun's gravitational pull even if a black hole or supernova would occur at it's position literally nothing would happen.

Black holes don't exist
In space at least cause ya mam has one

Black holes aren’t real and Einstein was a fraud

I won't speculate on it being electromagnetism, but you are right on the first bit. "scientists" are scared of admitting "we have no fucking clue!" so they try to stick a label on shit that we can't really know till we get out there.

>Konstantin Batygin and Michael E. Brown suggest that Planet Nine could be the core of a giant planet that was ejected from its original orbit by Jupiter during the genesis of the Solar System.
I have no doubt this is correct since the ancients hinted at this everywhere.

Explain those then.

Attached: Gravitational lensing.jpg (800x466, 74.7K)

another simple jack. good on you. I bet your father is proud.

>The smallest confirmed black holes are 3-4 solar masses.
>confirmed black holes

good if true we shit out of luck if not
if true we get to study a black hole and probably advance further faster when we get to study it. maybe not our lifetime if nothing is found
if not we then we got some shitty planet or brown dwarf.

Attached: black hole chan.jpg (1269x1525, 217.91K)

The reason the scientific community rejects plasma cosmology in favor of conventional cosmology is because the former is contradicted by all of the observational evidence, and the second is confirmed by it.

Holy shit BDanon was right!

Attached: VP-GRAPHIC-SPAGHETTIFICATION.jpg (1500x1000, 1.16M)

Why must you spoil the magic?

Micro black holes are unproven and unobserved. That's pretty important.

>posting the low res version that doesn't show the trace vapor from the manuvering jets making it wobble
>ITS ALL STRINGS AND WIRE GUYS I SWEAR

Everything, including the sun, is revolving around the center of mass in the solar system, and all data shows that the center is waaaaaaay off. The sun damn well should make up the overwhelming majority of the mass, but it wobbles.
So either nasa is full of lazy fucks who suck at crunching numbers (which is possible, given their recent hiring policies), or there's something huge, really close.

They don't invent it. It's what you call the phenomenon until you figure out what's v wrong with your theories.

It literally is retard. That’s what a black hole is. It’s gravity so strong it pulls light into it. The light past the event horizon is still pulled, just not enough, causing lensing

I agree that it's probably not a primordial black hole, as primordial black holes of that size have been ruled out as dark matter candidates, so if they exist, they are extremely uncommon. But everything else you said is nonsense. A 5 Earth mass black hole has a radius of 4 cm. It's not eating shit.

>Micro black holes are unproven and unobserved.
>Micro black holes

see

Black holes doesnt exist.

Space is fake

>A fucking period stain

I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE!

>he doesn't know

That’s not how black holes work. They have mass and only attract a certain amount of shit based on that mass