eco-anarchists would probably believe the eventual outcome of fascist societies would still be boredom, psychological suffering, meaninglessness, losing touch with nature, etc., due to the belief that technology is the true governing/driving force rather than ideology and political system.
Questions about /Ted/
Yes, it can be.
Basically, the technological system is self-directed. The very rules of cold logic, efficiency, efficacy, always resulting in a fixed tendency towards 'the one best way' to do anything, determine that the tech sys is in fact semi-autonomous, and NOT under the control of humanity, no matter how much democracy or authoritarianism you throw at it.
For example, the best way to mass-produce a car is the same whether it be in a Constitutional democracy or in a Marxist-Leninist dictatorship.
Another example: the problem of optimal production and distribution of wheat is on a strictly technical level the same in an Anarcho-commune as it is in a Fascist ethnocentric white community. The keyword here is 'optimal'; anything less than optimal is just a hinderance, a hinderance which no ideological gymnastics can improve; within any industrialized society, no matter what the underlying ideological tenets, only pure technical solutions can in the end address technical problems.
Obviously there are at least two finnanons in /TKG/, not an idiot here, but good day to you to finnanon.
Fire as well, as we can see from ancient deforestation practices like in Scotland and Australia
>due to the belief that technology is the true governing/driving force rather than ideology and political system.
Not just a belief, bro.... High-organization and efficient logistics are the same everywhere, no matter what the incidental ideological/propagandistic context may happen to be; in all cases, ideology and its propaganda will soon enough effect and accomodate changes to the ideological infrastructure as the needs
of technological progress may eventually require. Technological progress abides by its own intrinsic laws of reason and logic in a self-directed and goal-oriented manner.
i meant that industrial society would eventually collapse, not society in general
we need to have a freedom club asap
Very true, fire was an ABSOLUTE mile-stone in human development.
we are talking about the dawn of industrial society, not the dawn of society
fire was the first invention, agriculture came second
Ted was blasted with LSD by the CIA. he had prophetic visions of the future and didn't like it.
You may call me OG-Finn to separate me from other Finnish tedposters. If I recall correctly I've been in TKG since the first thread and posted quantitatively the most alongside you and Germanon.