Emma Watson says Homosexuality is better than Regular Relationships

I think being forced to go down on Harvey Weinstein left Emma Watson with a bad impression of what heterosexual sex is like.

Whites shouldn't breed

If your experience of sexuality was being Harvey Weinstein's underage prostitute, you would probably not be a big fan of hetero sex either.

After dealing with my bitch of a wife im thinking shes right but im repulsed by dudes sexually

That’s fucking rich coming from a goat fucking shitstained sand nigger

Who gives a shit? She got famous for being not as bad as other kids that showed up to pretend to a smart magician. She's not actually a smart magician, she's just British.

Mutts are subhuman. You are an abomination on mankind

she is so boyish looking that fucking her in the arse would be considered gay

APOLOGIZE FOR YOUR CAR YOU FUCKING WHORE

FUCK

That's exactly what I would say after having anal with Harvey

Attached: meme reality.png (984x550, 970.8K)

lol yeah
taking actors and actresses seriously needs to stop

No way lmfao

Yes, she’s fucking jlaw now

Attached: CE44F382-F86F-438C-87CE-4F36585750B7.jpg (683x683, 67.84K)

I guess she killed all the men in her family.

clearly she hasn't read the aids statistics, because homosexuality is CLEARLY not the healthier choice or logical considering that's now how you breed

Emma is seeking revenge on men because of what harvey did to her puss

she's just telling her stalkers to fuck off and suck a dick
can't blame her really

I'm not sure how you judge the quality of the relationships of others based only on what they tell you or you see in public. How would she know how these relationship are when she's not around? Seems like a really childish opinion to state. Also its extreme stereotyping which I though people like her are against

I think we can all sit down and agree that she was part of one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Attached: 1483301878004.jpg (1601x2886, 3.13M)

underrated post

Attached: 1452718456981.gif (404x416, 180.48K)

If I were Emma, I would curse all men!

youtube.com/watch?v=mEApWIAaiDk

Suck the dick, goy.

They all left, rightfully so.

Spending ones formative years in a hyper sexual environment can lead to sexual deviancy

>there is a strong link between sexual abuse at a young age and deviant sexual proclivities later in life
>the average age at which boys first seek out porn is 11 years old
>showing porn to an 11 year old is literally sexual abuse
>free high speed internet porn has only been around for about 15 years
>1/3 of zoomers don’t identify as “cis gendered heterosexual”

It gets weirder

>early puberty is when we developed ideas about what sex is
>kids growing with the internet learn this from or are influenced by porn
>porn focuses almost exclusively on women; men’s faces are cropped out, and they’re usually silent.
>the pleasure showcased in porn is that of the woman, even scenes of fellatio
>subconsciously, children developed the idea that sexual pleasure is derived from the passive/receptive/female role
>there’s been an explosion in the number of trannies
>the majority of fags will want to take on the receptive role during sex

InB4 I watched porn and that didn’t happen to me

InB4 I’m a faggot and that’s not why

InB4 no one wants to look at guys in porn

Attached: FE21FB47-13AF-46AF-9D85-EB279D3897FC.gif (224x238, 3.74M)

>clearly she hasn't read the aids statistics, because homosexuality is CLEARLY not the healthier choice or logical considering that's now how you breed
aids kills less than corona chan now
let your hair down and suck that dick

Attached: Untitled.png (753x466, 19.76K)

Amazing how many of these Harvey Weinstein defending Whores shill a Globalist agenda?
thread related Lawrence;

Girls who sleep around in their youth have as many problems with that memory as chaste virgins do with theirs.
It isnt till much later in life that it becomes apparent which had the better experience.

I'd say the issues with extreme promiscuity, mental illness and domestic abuse are just as bad. Gays are really vile people, from almost any ideological perspective, if you judge them from their behaviour alone.

why should I care what some boomer lady thinks?

Must be why domestic abuse rates among lesbian couples are multiple times greater than hetero couples. They just love beating the shit out of each other.

>They agree [on] things between them as opposed to [accepting] certain sets of assumptions and expectations that are made
This is a pretty typical outlook for a citizen of an individualist Western democracy. She prefers people deciding on and forming their own weird arrangements (such as throuples) over people sticking to the formula of matrimony and all the role-play that occurs within that arrangement. She likes arrangements that prioritize the individual and dislikes arrangements that prioritize stability at the cost of individuality. IE, in order to play the wife you have to stop playing yourself to some extent. That's the visceral act of "settling," that self-sacrifice that comes from giving up something to make things work with your partner.

That's all well and good so long as you assume that the matrimonial relationship and all its "assumptions and expectations" arose out of nothing but superstition/"hate"/whatever, and feel that there's little or no possibility of all the inertia of the past arising out of some sort of emergent necessity. Or to put it another way, you need to believe that those thousands of years of separately evolved but very similar institutions of matrimony from the world over don't have any wisdom to them whatsoever, that it's all just superstition, and so you're free to discard it for new arrangements as long as everyone consents.

Is that really true though? Are the traditional assumptions and expectations really just arbitrary superstitions?

Attached: 1558186194099.jpg (960x859, 54.69K)

yes, since the world wars, the elites have been pushing hard with the pacifist movement. modern warfare endangers even their lives, since bombing threatens the entire cities in one go. warfare isn't only a big risk to the lower class anymore

consequently the pacifist movment has controlled things in order to crush all manly virtue, in order to end martial virtue which is obviously included in it. it's a peace-at-all-costs status quo, and such things like promotion of homosexuality are part of it

Give a Jew-molested little girl a shitload of money, raise her around all the wrong people, and this is what you get.

for all her "success," she's been ruined as a person.

Attached: WonderfulLittleGirl.gif (196x300, 1.95M)

Emma Watson is stupid

the closest apostles of jesus were jews, user.; that means whatever you're talking about is something good

Tolkien was excellent, go fuck yourself.

Nothing irrational about that since the invention of nukes. Any serious war on modern Earth ends with literally everyone dead, even those uncontacted tribes out in the jungle.

she's corrupt

Bestiality is a European tradition.

Attached: Pan.jpg (512x416, 61.73K)

>it's good to promote sodomy
hell is destructive !

>tolkien
>same "shit" tier as harry potter

God i hate /lit/ fags more prude, edgelord and contrarian than Yas Forums

Bullshit. Whites have a much, much better experience. They’re having the time of their life. The end result is different but traveling the world and fucking random guys while using drugs and being praised for it via Facebook is in hell of a ride.

I'd fuck a man if Emma would like me sniff and lick her asshole first.

Litterally fucking who has an opinion.

>aids kills less than corona chan now
Not really.
AIDS can be controlled to a degree with drugs, but it can't be cured, and it will eventually kill you.
the Wuhan wobbles will probably kill you if you also have AIDS, regardless of the drugs.

AIDS eventually kills everyone it touches.

Remember when actors were regarded as scum on the same level as prostitutes. Pepperidge Farm remembers.

Anyone got the pics of her trying on clothes and you can see her ass

sounds like you copied a paragraph from your human sexuality textbook from your PSY 101 class... eat shit faggot

Jesus was a Jew, what of it?
Being Christian usually means laying down and showing your belly.

Weinstein broke her. Watson is so far off the deep end, she thinks woman having to give birth is rape

Thanks for pedowood.

What are you going to do, flex the nuclear winter away?

We don't live in Alexander the Great's world anymore. War is death. It hasn't been "manly" since we invented the repeating rifle, it's just a numbers game with alienated bodies wandering desolate hellscapes shooting around corners and at distant shapes. It's even more so that way when the "fighting" is done by pressing the go button on an ICBM that will go to wipe out a city full of men, women, oldfolk and children in a place you'd have to fly most of a day by plane to go see in person. The scale of it is just inhuman, and far enough away from what the tribal violence instinct is looking for that it makes a joke of the idea of the warrior. You were born too late for that.

She's right

Emma Watson needs a throat pie with both hands on the back of her head.

>Any serious war on modern Earth ends with literally everyone dead
No it doesn't, that's a meme.

that slag on the right is just so blatantly british