Books to refute diversity hiring

That wouldn't not ensure loyalty to power, they want lemmings, not merit. Diverse simply means non-white, they have a huge Orwellian vocabulary for these things.

Attached: googlediversity.jpg (1500x938, 217.13K)

What are other people’s justifications for being supportive of diversity hiring practices? When discussing this, what are the pros and cons that are brought up? Does anybody ever even mention what the potential downsides are of emphasizing diversity as a qualifying trait over the quality of a candidate?

Yeah I'd also second recommendation to look up "Bio-Leninism" by the blogger Spandrell. He describes the precise mechanisms of power behind the diversity cult in more detail than you'll get from reading Alinsky.

whats wrong with hiring based on diversity, surely youre not going to cuck yourself out of a promotion by hiring someone more capable than you.
Better the biases you know than the biases you dont know

>the absolute state of academia

Attached: 1426305331680.jpg (708x708, 55.23K)

>Does anybody ever even mention what the potential downsides are of emphasizing diversity as a qualifying trait over the quality of a candidate?
There's obviously many arguments to be made against it but has there ever been a single argument for it or any upside?

In an socialist or communist ethnostate the first duty is to the people and thus it would make sense to hire based on race and group belonging. Like in China. But to any liberal corporation and institution what is the point of hiring based on race, gender or even sexuality? It makes sense for the state since they value loyalty higher than anything else, but for a business?

Attached: 1470057529170.jpg (236x226, 10.54K)

>whats wrong with hiring based on diversity
As soon as a blackm indian or chinese get into a position where they can hire people, they only hire their own.
Quickly you'll find you have no allies and get forces out

Can confirm. Same with "progressives", women, Jews, etc.
"Diversity" is just code for anti-white.

>MBA
>academia

you're a graduate student and can't do your own research? it's not even a niche topic. but I guess that's why you're in a subpar MBA program

>m in a masters program and am having diversity hiring bullshit shoved down my throat. What are books that I can use as a source against this insane, emotional way of perversion?

Attached: homme_le_plus_gros_du_monde.jpg (400x267, 33.35K)

Seething diversity hire.

Well I do think there are definitely some positives, but I don’t know if I’d necessarily say they outweigh the downsides, and they’re only applicable on an individual level. People’s different viewpoints, especially those that deviate from the norm, do offer certain values that people with more common qualities don’t.

Like being bilingual for example -
1. You can interact with more people that your organization may have connections with.
2. You’re able to think about things from different angles because certain words/themes have different meanings to you based off of which lens you can consciously decide to view them from.

>ad hominem attack that adds nothing to the thread

wtf I love diversity now

Attached: 1513201029813.png (580x608, 305.14K)

Attached: zx.jpg (217x346, 19.26K)

>being bilingual
That's a merit and not identity based.
>People’s different viewpoints
This is not the 'diversity' they want, they want complete ideological orthodoxy. And it's also extremely Yas Forums-pilled to tie this entirely to race, I find the implications of it funny desu.

I only intended to note that OP is not in a master's program. More likely he is unemployed.

Neoliberalism is so based.

By the way, if you switch races then it's the worst thing ever and worse than nazism.

Attached: 1556118657376.jpg (676x1024, 118.07K)

Meritocracy is racist.

Just say you're of another race. Say you're Jewish, for example. And if you're not religious, say you're Muslim or something.
Just say it.

>whats wrong with hiring based on diversity, surely youre not going to cuck yourself out of a promotion by hiring someone more capable than you.

You changed from diverse hiring to meritocratic hiring. The two are not inherently connected.

Diversity hiring, however, is inherently tied to race and/or sex. Thus, it is purely discriminatory hiring -- pushed under the positive discrimination guise, i.e. we need to "correct" a fault by implementing a fault.

>What is conversation
nigger

I'm sure every school has to go through this. They perpetuate this shit by having plenty of diversity hires in my program. I doubt I could speak out against this, even if I used soft language. Already tried that today by calling the diversity hiring "emotional", and was shot down for insinuating that its emotional and not logical.

>having to write report focused on the inequalities of medical screening programmes
>white people generally take the screenings when offered, black people don't
>have to spin it as some socio-economic bullshit
>I can't just say they are stupid and don't take free medical procedures when offered them because my boss will get angry otherwise
>even though every data set I've combed through generally points towards this conclusion
legitimately mad

No, I won't be ashamed of who I am nor lie about it. That would be their final victory.

Attached: image-placeholder-title.jpg (1020x1200, 169.38K)

Harrison Bergeron is what my dad had me read in Jr. High

With what as the basis of your claim, why isnt the workforce already saturated with minority hires if what you say is true, a single person cannot have worked in enough firms to make this claim, where are all the previously white owned now x race companies, diversity hires remain marginalized unless exceptionally exceptional
be that it may, diversity hiring stems from a reaction to bias that we know we have but can't adjust to naturally. Its easier to say "look, just hire the black guy" than to reflect on a lifetime of why it is you might overlook a candidate for someone that resembles yourself unless of course you believe that people of x characteristic are superior by nature

Attached: Polar-Bear-Mother-and-Cubs-by-Michelle-Valberg-_MV83473_SM.jpg (720x523, 70.87K)

literal white pride, kek

>diversity hiring stems from a reaction to bias that we know we have but can't adjust to naturally
This claim never holds up to real evidence. Implicit Bias is pseudoscience that fails any rigorous testing.

>where are all the previously white owned now x race companies
All over the place, you should pay more attention. Just look at silicon valley.

Thanks for the blog rec, just finished part 1. spot on

wiki suggests its complicated
>One example of the latter case is that scores on the Race IAT are known to be less biased against African Americans when those taking it imagine positive Black exemplars beforehand (e.g. Martin Luther King).[72]
> Race IAT scores can be changed even more easily; administering the IAT in different languages yields significantly different scores for bilingual individuals.
>Another state characteristic that may well influence IAT scores is the time of day a person completes the task, with findings that holding a preference for one's own racial group is lowest in the morning, but increases over the course of the day and into the evening;[75]
effectively not pseudo-sci, but not enough to warrant diversity clause, unless the problem is far more complex, systematic and historical...
specifically, actually try this time

>tests are wildly inconsistent based on as small a change as the time of day it's taken
>taking the test more than once consistently results in different outcomes

>it's complicated
Come on bro, this is the epitome of pseudo-science. There is literally evidence of ESP that requires less P-hacking to look good.

Yes, and? The jew or the negroid couldn't even imagine having to denounce his people to get a job and not doing so would label him a racial supremacist. Half the problem is the white people who put up with this nonsense. Pride for me and not for thee always builds resentment and it's no wonder national socialists gain more sympathy by the day, that the foolish dream of a society not built upon race dies by the minute. Anglos were egalitarian, forced this upon all Europeans and this is the payoff. Giving other people than whites any rights at all in America was the greatest mistake in the history of the US.

Attached: 86ki.jpg (1242x1226, 133.79K)

sorry that you got intellectually cucked but this board isnt for you to air your professional failings

>The jew or the negroid couldn't even imagine having to denounce his people to get a job
maybe not to get a job but they sure have to continue living
> it's no wonder national socialists gain more sympathy by the day
maybe on your pol reality tunnel kek
>a society not built upon race
distractions, class warfare is the strife of our times
>Giving other people than whites any rights at all in America was the greatest mistake in the history of the US.
literally the whitest opinion imaginable

yes the limitations of science is the current bastion of societal progress theres enough evidence in this thread that would affirm the bias

>distractions, class warfare is the strife of our times
That is the real distraction and nobody who's turned into a second class citizen in his own country cares much about it. A classless society is utopian nonsense, racial power is tangible and real.
>literally the whitest opinion imaginable
Good. But if you look at it objectively, do you really object at all? You could say that it worked out in your favour that the gullible anglos helped their enemies to get into power and that this wasn't reciprocative egalitarianism, but clearly you don't believe in those retarded values yourself even if you benefitted from others having them.

Ending slavery only to be demonised by your education system, your media and your very state. Giving opportunities to hostile races only for them to deny you the same at every possible instance. No 'good' deed ever goes unpunished and the only path to power lies in strength and total dedication to the self-interest of the group at the expense of everyone else if need be. Those are the lessons one is to take home from history and the current state of things. That kindness, fairness and all other moronic notions of virtue all lead to complete destruction.

Maybe talking about this makes you uncomfortable and you'd rather shift the conversation to abstracted economics, but it's there in the open whether you want it or not and it won't go away.

Attached: 6341596815_6a361de69d_o.jpg (1010x1118, 195.63K)

Based dad.

How about it enforces class divisions, and serves as a useful distraction to the wealthy of this country from working class people wising up. A busy box for the idiot professional managerial class to think they're accomplishing something to improve the world. Look up the history, it's the close cousin of legacy admissions.
All it does is legitimize the power of the black, mexican, and indian political classes. There are many people in all of these races who have a lot of money and power and are benefiting greatly from diversity, they are not as under-privileged as they'd have you believe.
So you could spazz out about muh IQs, invariably developing a cuckold fetish like the rest of Yas Forums, or you could see this for what it is, and have a meaningful structure of criticism for diversity bullshit and identity politics, by exploring it from the angle of class.
jacobinmag.com/2020/04/atlanta-sanitation-workers-strike-maynard-jackson
And, is right. Buy guns and shoot often.

A classless society is utopian nonsense, absolutely.
Instead, embrace the fact that classes are real. They will always be real, they have always been real. There is no such thing as racial power, look at the history of racial coalition building in the united states. Unless you happened to be a part of the lucky few, you had the option of getting exploited by a rich irishman if you were irish, a rich black if you were a black.
Even in the hypothetical ethnostate, my situation as a working class guy doesn't change much. You'd give me a scapegoat, sure, but what would you do for my income and family? Practically nothing, as far right government have shown time and time again they only ever succeed in increasing the power of those who already held it. Your fascist ethnostate would have no choice but to kiss the feet of industry.
Understand: class is the most meaningful "identity group" available, and the only option in terms of consolidating power and using that power to bargain for an increased quality of life.

By going to class alone you're being reductionist and silly. What you call identity politics is simply the natural world and you're just spouting abstracted nonsense. Class or caste might be real, but you cannot ignore the organism itself, it is the foundation upon which everything else rests.

no doubt, and instead of kidding yourself larping as a member of some ascendant ethnic class you should recognize your position at the bottom of a very real class totem pole and do something to make your life better.

You can't. Diversity is a religion. Proof against it is abundant, presenting evidence will be ignored no matter how solid. Frankly you should have known this from the get go.

Attached: 1566740624136.jpg (724x960, 110.81K)

There will always be a hierarchy and power will always be what the state seeks. Hierarchies can be positive or negative for the group, I care not for the individual nor do I want personal power. If the current hierarchy promotes invaders to take the territory of my people, go against their interests and such then I'm against it. If the hierarchy is with my people I'm for it. Don't care where in the hierarchy I am, were I a peasant, a knight or a priest in medieval times I'd support a good king regardless of my position and help defend my people against conquerors who sought to pillage, enslave, kill or otherwise harm them. Had I a communist state as the Chinese or the DPRK do then I'd support that too, I don't care if that entails toiling in the fields or whatever. As long as the collective organism is the heart of it. It doesn't matter if some have more power than others or if some wear better clothes or drink finer wine. This is a trivial issue.

The problem with international finance or the mercantile society is not that it exploits the people but where it places power and that it goes against the interests of the people, that the people do not toil for their own sake but against themselves. Europeans slave away today for a future without them in it at all, all industry was moved to China and other areas of the world where labour was cheaper.

What would make my life better would be if my people were in charge of their own state and with a hierarchy bound by blood to them. That wielded absolute power in an explicit way that came with responsibility.

Attached: 1469987856800.jpg (604x604, 100.31K)

It would be scientific articles, not books.

There is a psychologist who usually writes about political bias in psychology. Lee Jussim. Take a look at his writings and you will find that most of the studies who are used as a justification for diversity stuff are not replicable

>refusing to supplicate bullies who want you to be ashamed of who you are is racism

You're garbage.

It's what capital does. If there's oil in the ground, someone will come and drill it. If there's high trust and societal cohesion, someone will come and stick unvetted (people born in societies with different selection pressures) people in there if they can make money from it, and they'll do so under the guise of tolerance and diversity.

Obviously, societal cohesion will run dry but there wont be a single person that is "culpable" for this resource going away. They might even say that societal cohesion is for suckers and truly you should only be able to trust yourself; it's an easy way to create a society of schemers and swindlers.

White people existing at all is 'racism' and their very being is pathologised. Again, any 'kindness' extended to the out-group is a strike against your own. The Christian ethics were a mistake and Europeans ought to have been diabolical and sinister, if they had been they wouldn't face the fate they do today.

Non-whites know this and act accordingly. When the white Americans enitely lose any cohesion and power they will not be given a hand in friendship by those they wanted as equals but a knife driven into their hearts if they aren't pissed on first, arguably it is already at this point.

Attached: D7GYmSvUYAMVkzL.jpeg.jpg (1021x702, 167.28K)

To add to this: not everyone singing the praise of diversity is making money from it. But they know where real power is. They're wealth signalling. "Oh, I don't mind more people from different cultures, I have enough capital, social or otherwise, to not become part of an ethnified underclass. I can always chill with Bill Gates in New Zealand if things get rough"
It doesn't matter if they have this wealth, they probably don't even think about it like this, but to talk like this is to signal fitness.

So it's all just basically fitness signalling hijacked by capital.

>maybe on your pol reality tunnel kek

>Says NatSocs aren't gaining more sympathy by the day
>Cries that NatSocs have spread to every board on Yas Forums

The reason your types can never win is because you are all weak-willed slaves. Your masters don't care about you and you don't care about the Truth. Thus you are doomed forever to be complete dreck.

Wealth by itself isn't a problem if it's tied to the people and the state desu. Just look at China.

Ohhhh good i'm cooming.

Typical diversity hire desu.

Wealth isn't a "problem" but it will find ways to eat away at whatever is there. China has its fair share of corruption and nepotism

Sure, but their state power is so strong they can obliterate traitorous aristocrats and most of their money is tied up with the state. It's a completely different situation compared to say the US, where the rich has no loyality to anyone and basically determine policy.

For sure, we have a more dire situation in the west where the elite has mentally married a love of diversity with an opportunity to profit from this weird fitness signalling chicken race. I honestly think they're not even aware of it, they're in "profit" mode and whatever makes them profit is morally righteous, and it must be true since every intellectual worth his salt will say that they are right.

>either/or belief systems are hallmarks of white supremacy
>slide sets up it's own either/or scenarios

that's a good observation

Farmer's Almanac

That's just the usual hypocrisy, I thought /lit/ would react more to the 'white supremacy is valuing writing skills more than empathy' part under 'worship of the written word'.

>bro just be deliberately ignorant
How do people like these get on literature boards?

>bro just be deliberately ignorant
Winning strategy for Africans.

The only one they've ever used

Forced diversity is a natural consequence to America becoming predominantly non-white and makes sense for public institutions. If IQ is mostly hereditary (true), and blacks and Mexicans are genetically handicapped on average vs whites (true), why should these lower intellectual races be forced to pay taxes for school their kids have no chance of attending?

Your best shot is to lie and say you’re Mexican which will allow you to reap the rewards of this lunacy.

I'm not him, but I think meant that Asians and Latinos are more likely to be bilingual.

If you've never actually been in leadership then you're never going to understand why diversity matters.

I could hire 100 qualified people who think exactly like me and do exactly what I say, and it would be a shit idea because I'm not perfect and I'm not always right. As a leader you need people who are DIFFERENT from you, who will challenge your decisions and make you defend them. If you want to see where hiring nothing but cardboard yes-men gets you have a look at how the US is handling the coronavirus.

When you hire people you should be trying to cover your own blind spots as much as filling the position. Diversity assists with that - to an extent. But recruiting the exact right person for the exact right position is really fucking hard, so companies play a numbers game by setting targets and quotas and hoping that injects enough healthy instability.

>If you want to see where hiring nothing but cardboard yes-men gets you have a look at how the US is handling the coronavirus.

how did china handle it, TDS sufferer?

>they handled it perfectly, xi jinping, please throatfuck me

China had the same problem, dumbass.

You're so fucking stupid. Hiring a nigger doesn't mean they will think DIFFERENT for your benefit. You make the assumption that all white guys think the same - stupid fuck. Explain to me how NASA, a group of white men, got to the moon. Where was the diversity in that one?

If you hire intelligent people, you will be able to cover your bases without hiring subhuman diversity hires.

You should kill yourself.

>bro you can’t trust yourself so trust retards instead
I still believe this argument is a parody.

yeah, and they lied about it, allowed it to spread, imprisoned doctors who tried to warn the world about it, etc.

but we can't forget

we can never forget

we must always remember

orange

man

bad

>daddy xi, rub my nipples when you cum down my throat

You're so tiresome.

Attached: 1564549124565.jpg (1200x600, 118.1K)

I'm not even white you pathetic faggot. Have fun with your team of retards, niggers, and fags - I'm sure you do lots of valuable work.

wee

If you only hire the same people you'll only ever get the same decisions.

Making the same decisions in a changing environment is suboptimal.

Big companies fail all the time for this reason.

This is an incredibly simple thing to understand that you are rejecting because of ideology.

lmao how do you really believe that all white people are the same? Are there really no other traits to select for besides race and gender? Is it true that you are that ignorant?

Name a big company right now that is failing because they didn't hire niggers, fags, and whores? Name one.

You sound just like my boss who is fucking up big time due to being driven by stupid 'diversity' propaganda rather than results and merit. Managers are always midwits, not intelligent enough to do any actual work but also not intelligent enough to start or run a company. Yeah, if more than half of your workforce aren't Somalians you're missing an important perspective, right. This is why the US can no longer create aeroplanes anymore.

don't bother, just let him lurk. he believes a kansas hick has something in common with an upper crust NY ivy league douchebag. his mind is on the simple spoonfed categories of "white" and "non-white", as if it predicts, income, voting patterns, musical taste, accent, geographical location, or anything at all (it doesn't - it's a made up category pushed by a retarded academic cult and by literal white supremacists).

>lmao how do you really believe that all white people are the same?
Are you implying that all white people aren't all white?

Of course not.

So there's at least one way in which all white people ARE the same. And that's just ONE.

Now let's go further and use the case study from the OP - the actual subject of discussion. They're only hiring high-performing business students from top universities. So now they're not just hiring only white people, they're probably hiring only white upper-middle class white people from sheltered backgrounds and so on and so on.

>Managers are always midwits
Yeah but eventually some of the better ones become senior managers and one or two of them might even become executives.

The problem is that companies filter out creativity and initiative at the bottom and so don't have it at the top, which is why they spend so much on external recruitment.

Read the case study in the OP you fucking moron. They aren't hiring Kansas hicks. They are ONLY hiring upper crust NY Ivy League douchebags, which is the problem that they are trying to solve.

>"but why do they need to hire niggers? they could just hire kansas hicks?"
Sure, and it would be nakedly racist which is what you're so desperately trying to conceal.

You're hopeless. I think your best option is suicide, but since you relax around blacks I'm sure you'll get whats coming.

Sounds like you have a chip on your shoulder - didn't picked for the highschool football team? Got to stick it to Brad still?

If you think that the majority of people at top tier MBA's are all white upper crust men you're absolutely retarded. Get real - it's 2020 and half of all incoming MBA classes are minorities, women, and fags. I'm in one right now.

>your skin color dictates who you are
You’ve devolved into nonsensical hilarity.

then why do they want to hire negroes instead of kansas hicks? you're retarded or being deliberately obtuse.

This is the most insane way I've ever heard someone defend race based hiring practices, all white people are the same so they have to hire groids and shit because they're a different species or something. That's some galaxy brained reasoning.

Attached: 7275124373274215671410015022.png (615x513, 295.66K)

>maybe on your pol reality tunnel kek
Hungary literally let their far-right prime minister become dictator just a couple days ago.

B A S E D

probably because their continent is being invaded by arabs

>morons who have never held a leadership position or been responsible for managing people attempting to lecture about groupthink
The four of you provide less value than just two people who were capable of independent thought would, because all four of you are saying the exact same shit.

That's the point.

You are the same person so therefore we only need one of you around.

Hence, diversity quotas.

Do not expect further reply.

troll. fuck your anus. i fuck your anus with the force of 20,000 cocks.

this was a diverse opinion and therefore is inherently valuable by your own definition.

Bix nood, mufugga.

>Hence we only need one of you
Dunno about you, but if that one person worked their ass off, I'd gladly hire more of them. But at the same time consider the following question:
What is the result of 2 + 2?
If you answered 4, congratulations, you're the exact same person as everyone else that answered 4. If you answered something that isn't 4, you're either genuinely retarded and bad for the company, or you're a special snowflake that ignores basic truths in favor of standing out and you will be catastrophically detrimental to the company.

PS: managers are midwits, but the smart people can play their game and get promoted and when the time is right, show their innovative and creative ideas. Only idiots and very very unlucky people get stuck at the bottom.

Attached: 1579097950414.png (636x441, 465.08K)

I agree, that is why I am sure to shit directly into your mother’s mouth every morning.

>Giving other people than whites any rights at all in America was the greatest mistake in the history of the US.
Susan B Anthony agrees with you

Tell me some other options. Does Jewish fall under "other" because usually I only see spick, chink etc. on the diversity forms. I have been fucked enough by these quotas I'm now going to do everything in my power to abuse them.
And you better learn quick if you want to have a career. Get into power first, then destroy the bastards.

Attached: serveimage.jpg (500x512, 81.82K)

>there is no such thing as racial power, look at the history of racial coalition building in the united states

Attached: 0)00000003833838.jpg (1200x1032, 253.86K)

Don't show your power level.
Facing Reality In American Education by Robert Walters.

>implying tyrone, samprete and achmed aren't also yes-men
true, except business managers are fucking idiots because all the non-technical managers i've ever worked for only hired/promoted yes-men and even worse yes-women

Absolutely do not reveal your power level by engaging in argument.
Get into power and destroy the bastards from the inside. It is the only language they understand.
They killed Mark Fisher, don't let yourself be next.
opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/exiting-vampire-castle/

>If you only hire the same people you'll only ever get the same decisions.
>implying the people aren't adaptable
humans are the most adaptable species on earth

you: hey jim what's for lunch today?
jim: pizza
you: crazy taco's is doing 2-for-1 tuesdays
jim: let's get taco's then

FUCK YEAH ADAPTABLE

>Hungary literally let their far-right prime minister become dictator just a couple days ago.
>probably because their continent is being invaded by arabs
fuck yeah the return of VLAD THE IMPALER

That's making assumptions based on stereotypes and therefore racist

If I had my way and I ran a publishing empire every submission would have the author's name stripped from it. Which is to say every submission would be anonymous in the eyes of the editor. "What's in a name?" more than you'd care to admit. Certainly there are very few white people named Liu Chong, but the second you've let someone's name influence you're choice, you've corrupted it. Filthy ideologues ought to be driven out with fire and sword. All I care about how good IT is, not who wrote it. The moment you think otherwise you have given permission to the
falling rate of intelligence" which is theorized to correlate to the "fall rate of profit" : the paradoxical favoritism of statistical repetition at the expense of true innovation in capitalism. The value-left of today is thoroughly capitalist and reactionary in that regard. Not that that is inherently wrong, but basing your values ("Market x would like to see more bisexual female antagonists based on this graph...) is false consciousness. Stop making it about who did it and make it about the thing in itself. Be OBJECTIVE. That's what's pure.

we need a convincing proposal for objective aesthetics within literary studies. don't know who's going to write that one

He's also right, so any alternative viewpoints would be entirely redundant.