When will we finally learn if this was real or not

lol no

>reposting every apollo bread

to prove the *manned moon landing by Popperian scientific standards evidence must

>i. independent
>ii. verifiable
>ii. repeatable

Thus the best form of evidence for the manned moon landings would be an (i) independent country e.g. Russia, China, Japan or India, sending a moon orbiter to take high definition photos of the flags, the footsteps and the apollo craft (ii) which can be repeated many times to the same result (iii)

It costs $150million for a moon orbiter approx $75 for launch and $75million for the craft, this would be the best $150million ever spend.

The best evidence we have today for Apollo is
>a) the lunar rocks
>b) the laser refractors
However they do not verify(ii) man went on the moon they couldve been collected by Rovers.


NB
*Manned landing is the key word - intelligent skeptics who request proper evidence, do not dispute the unmanned landings e.g. rovers, generally they have satisfied the Popperian test for falsification.
The manned moon landings do not have to be true to be inspiring, they saved millions of lives from a potential nuclear war, and it should be known that the Soviets also faked their first spacewalk among other things.

Attached: ApolloDisclosureSoon.jpg (600x600, 421.03K)

China's program has nothing to do with the US

It was faked, undoubtedly so; only a fool would argue differently when we have the fake footage to examine.

>The United States uses the public treasury to support a hostile foreign power's attempts to show strength.
Cool, good to know.

I came to say this.

It was incredulously expensive and all that's up there is sharp rocks.
There's plenty of sharp rocks on Earth, you can even make your own sharp rocks without a multi million dollar suit on. You don't even have to wear anything at all if you don't want to.

Allegedly the USA place an UNMANNED missile base on the moon - with modified davy crocket missiles with nuclear tip warheads.
It was destroyed in 1979, by the Soviets.
pic wikileaks.

Attached: secretUSBaseDestroyed.jpg (868x312, 51.42K)

>nothing

Attached: starfleet1.png (1020x294, 95.98K)

>hey guys lets use triangles and circles to illustrate rockets and orbits
Its literally illegal for NASA to get involved in the Chinese space program
>inb4 hurr durr they do it in secret cause da jewish deep state

The pictures are bogus.
Question the mission