/TKG/ - Ted Kaczynski General #12 - Coofing Edition

To all anons involved in the FAQ:

Been trying to finish the first draft, we are really really close. However, been having some trouble or qualms about the las two questions remaining:

>8. use bitcoin ->The common person could protect themselves from tech companies micromanaging their lives

>9. Dude I'm so fucking past the whole save the world shit.

The problem with question 8 is more of a technical problem.... Bitcoin anf crypto is a highly technical thing, obviously. This fact in someway implies that the reply must be 'technically orthodox', so to speak; so, as the FAQ begins to circulate, it wil eventually reach anons who have much technical knowledge of crypto; and those crypto-minded anons may simply think 'whoever wrote this knows fuck all about crypto; fuck this FAQ, these people are a bunch of retards. Furthermore, crypto is not mentioned in ISAIF, obviously, given ISAIF is from 1995, and in any case, Ted would have known much better then to stick his nose in a highly technical matter just to prove some point.

The problem with question 9 is that it implies somehow that ted ws trying to save the world; sure, it can be inferred from his works that he may very well have been trying to do so, however, anyone who read ISAIF knows that the whole 'save the world' thing is typical of the Left. Nt sure anons want to associate themselves with anything Left related, and certainly Ted would not want that either.

Not saying the question themselves are bad, but that any possible answer to these questions might somehow 'compromise the integrity' of the rest of the FAQ.

So basically, just not really sure they should be a part of the FAQ.

What do you think, anons???

Attached: Thunabomber it is possible.jpg (1024x576, 88.19K)

thine thread shall be bumped

Attached: 1579517974191.jpg (1080x612, 66.36K)

Attached: Thunabomber not losing hope.jpg (1200x676, 1.08M)

.Filename

Thunabomber, fucking gold.

Definitely. That was a krautanon's originally, so can thank German's innate skill for propaganda for that, kek.

Attached: Thunabomber adapt and forget.jpg (1200x800, 188.39K)

Yas Forums turned so shit today that almost forgot this. Good evening you all usual suspects.

At least /mlpol/ only got better the longer time went on.

Attached: FUCK YOUR FACTORY.jpg (1080x1174, 104.06K)

Good to see you mate.

Please see when you get the chance.

Attached: Greta chopping off hands.jpg (992x558, 80.79K)

Like I was saying before. It's hard to argue in a satisfying (to them) way with people who 'know' about crypto. You begin to argue in terms of the system's own values.
Bitcoin even being an option necessitates that the infrastructure of the system is in place. As long as near-instant global communication and execution are possible, self-propagating systems WILL find a way to exploit those that are vulnerable. If you begin to argue Bitcoin's flaws, the other will simply begin to 'patch' the issues, which is tantamount to fixing technological issues with more technology.
I seriously doubt it is worth going deeper into the details of how Bitcoin works.

Attached: xOexCmTyU6OvB8YsqQaCglK570vgZOiRgoiz5x2AUSs.png (1080x817, 1000.41K)

Yeah I don't get question #8. This is maybe not a good answer but my opinion is that there's just no reason to expect them to allow cryptos to become a popular thing. Has anyone here ever heard of a country that willingly accepted a non-taxable currency not created by the State? It's a ridiculous notion that the American Dollar Empire would be powerless to do anything.

Someone certainly has a better answer to it; I just don't see how the hell cryptos would be allowed (if they started posing a serious threat).

>9. Dude I'm so fucking past the whole save the world shit.
How about save yourself and your loved ones? People that don't have healthy self-preservation interests simply are not our target demographic. We are here to convince those who love life and want to remain human. Not those who are already dead.

Attached: campfire comfy.png (638x573, 194.96K)

The last one (chopping off hands) is a quote by Linkola, not Ted.

Attached: Greta Thunabomber2.jpg (960x1280, 652.65K)

here's a Costeau quote

Attached: gretau.jpg (718x403, 38.37K)

Just today there was a thread in Yas Forums which talked about Bill Gates wanting to "tattoo" people, which should show if this person was vaccined or not. It was pretty dystopian (pic related). This was the thread:
Let's collect some dystopian implementations in TODAY'S SOCIETY , so people will see what the fuck is going on. I'll start:
-deep fake
-face recognizing cameras (some user had the name for the software, 'clear view' or something like that
-social credit system (it's still only china, soon in your country ;) )
-Merkel saying she'd use a tracking app, which would reduce the number of people getting infected (just saw that today) (link: reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-merkel-apps/merkel-will-recommend-tracking-apps-if-tests-successful-idUSKBN21J61P)

Attached: 1585736732636.png (738x778, 87.34K)

point 9.
This is too vague. Usually after saying that someone would say something like: "I just want to X"
That would be something worth tackling. People will read point 9, our response, and then immediately think of their own personal "what if I just want to X?" scenario.

This could potentially make up a great collection. It could really open the eyes of many people who are still stuck in limbo escapism. How can you not realize how bad things have gotten, when you CLEARLY see a collection of in real life already implemented dystopian technology

Attached: 1585736715062.png (692x731, 231.09K)

>You begin to argue in terms of the system's own values.
> You begin to argue in terms of the system's own values.

Agreed; the bitcoin question does not seem to have anything to do not only with the FAQ, but with Ted's body of work. Furthermore, any techie who fancies himself an 'expert' on crypto could very easily disregard th FAQ as a whole just because they didn't like the answer to what they may consider their field of expertise; not good at all for the FAQ or /TKG/.

>How about save yourself and your loved ones? People that don't have healthy self-preservation interests simply are not our target demographic. We are here to convince those who love life and want to remain human. Not those who are already dead.

OK, but getting trying to get people 'riled up' to obtain some goal inspired on some sense of compassion is THE main characteristic of the Left.

>Save the whales, user!
>Go vegan!
>muh minorities, muh immigrants, muh working class, muh LGBTQ, etc.

All of these self-deluded virtue-signalling fucks think they are 'saving the world', when in reality anyone who has read ISAIF with attention knows they are only making shit worse in the mid- and long-run.

The point is that question 9 might appeal to those people; it certainly appeals to that mindset/psychological make-up.... Not good.

I other words, there is no way of answering that question without at least partially appealing to the Left.

Might potentially make for good raw meme-making material.

Attached: Pepbbels Meme war.jpg (783x1096, 65.61K)

This also; minds are not that easy to shift from their set-course.

Here's one:
Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder–decoder framework (paper in Nature can't link for some reason)

>-deep fake
>-face recognizing cameras
>-social credit system
What's so maddening about these is that people always assume ''this is the peak of badness'' as if the trend isn't obvious. That means; less and less privacy. NEVER more. More control to central powers. Technology concentrates power. This is dangerous if you're not the one in power.

> 'clear view' or something like that
Clearview AI is a software that harvests faces from social media pictures and the software is used by law enforcement agencies.

>That means; less and less privacy. NEVER more.

But user, there are privacy laws enforced by the State to protect your privacy!

>This is dangerous if you're not the one in power.

But user, in western democracies, WE the people have the power! After all, there are different political parties, and we get to vote!

>-face recognizing cameras
>-social credit system

What do you have to hide, user? You're not some kid of criminal now, are you? This will help the Police catch bad guys! You don't want bad guys on the loose, do you user?

>-Merkel saying she'd use a tracking app, which would reduce the number of people getting infected (just saw that today) (link: reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-merkel-apps/merkel-will-recommend-tracking-apps-if-tests-successful-idUSKBN21J61P)

They're pushing this shit in 'the land of the free', too.

Based, thanks for sharing! Keep up these great threads! It’s one of the few threads on Yas Forums actually worth reading these days.

Neuralink - Symbiosis with Artificial Intelligence (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuralink)

>filename
Top kek

Sorry for being late anons. What did I miss?

Attached: Wojak Ted.jpg (1859x1070, 156.68K)

>OK, but getting trying to get people 'riled up' to obtain some goal inspire
Yeah someone more empathetic might be able to answer this. Not really a sensitive mood right not so can't give a passionate take on how ''one should try and save the world''. Someone else will surely be able to do it.

>there are privacy laws enforced by the State to protect your privacy!
I know you're doing the devils advocate, let me come back with: not even Merkel was able to hide from the All-Seeing Eye of Western intelligence agencies. Laws have never before stopped intel agencies or tech corporations from doing shady stuff and there's little reason to believe that the future is any different.

>in western democracies, WE the people have the power!
I wish this was a strawman but this is what the average person actually thinks. I don't know a good rebuttal to that.

I remember from somewhere that Google is able to track pretty much any kind of info (as in what you're currently doing) about you, as long as your phone is with you. Scary af.

Your welcome; you are always wlcome to come by and participate in /TKG/ user.

Here, source: youtube.com/watch?v=A7apzf-8jqU

youtube.com/watch?v=_kEJWoOVLtg

Europe can not be primitive if it will not import muslims.

almost missed the ted thread

>Yeah someone more empathetic might be able to answer this. Not really a sensitive mood right not so can't give a passionate take on how ''one should try and save the world''. Someone else will surely be able to do it.

It is too problematic a quetion to be in th FAQ. It will poison it, no matter who or how it gets answered. This user made a good point regarding the 'save the world' question.

>not even Merkel was able to hide from the All-Seeing Eye of Western intelligence agencies.

kek, that was really funny when that happened. And Obama in his typically sociopathic and diplomatic way politely telling her to go fuck herself was even funnier.

>I wish this was a strawman but this is what the average person actually thinks. I don't know a good rebuttal to that.

It is EXACTLY how they think. Fucking clown world, man.The only really good rebuttals against (((democracy))) imo come from Anarchism, (The old guys, Bakunin, etc.) NOT the current year gay-ass comped globohomo-serving version of Anarchism; two very different things, lol...... and NatSoc to some extent as well.

Nothing is as blackpilling as having someone respond along the lines of ''why does it matter? It's only more security''. How does one even respond to that. I've only had this conversation once IRL and got badly thunderstruck, as it didn't even occur to me that you could ''not care'' about privacy.

Attached: 1584069116831.jpg (255x171, 12.42K)

Hello b&hanon, you almost missed this:

Haven't keked this hard in a long time

Does /tkg/ advocate for arming the people?
Thoughts on weapon ownership in general?

Part of it is that normies have no idea what the fuck the word 'metadata' means; they have no idea what an all-powerful tool it is; and they are too propagandized to even begin care. It is very much a blackpill.

Paraphrasing here:

''He who exchanges liberty for safety, deserves neither.''

-Ben Franklin

>The only really good rebuttals against (((democracy)))
I feel our actual roots for anti-democratic thought come from being in touch with current events. It's a lived experience. We see who the people are that move the levers, we see how predictable media ''spin'' is in forming the opinions of the masses, we see who are the people actually profiting from policies and decisions. People who truly believe in democracy just don't follow stuff.

is there a discord

Can't speak for /tkg/ but I've nothing against it.

I don't know what you mean by ''arming the people'', but one should obviously own a gun if they can legally obtain it. /TKG/ is solidly behind self-sufficiency and the capability for self-defence.

Yeah.

new meme

Attached: terribleplace.png (1200x2000, 616.32K)

fixed typo

Attached: terribleplace.png (1200x2000, 616.29K)

Instantly saved

I suggest using meme panels to replace speech bubbles

Who the hell knows what /TKG/ advocates for, if anything... not sure any one user can really know or give a written-in-stone answer to this question.....

Possibly self-sufficiency; independence; not submitting the mind to mindless-propaganda (or at least attempting to).....

Many other corolary things could be inferred from these loosely-formed principles, if in fact they had anything to do with /TKG/......

----------

In any case user, there is a rough draft of the /TKG/ FAQ available at pastebin.com/ewvudniz

A first draft will be made available very shortly in future /TKG/ breads.

Attached: Ted innabeauty.jpg (500x392, 98.11K)

Those who have eyes, will see....

Attached: Eyes will see.jpg (520x520, 32.92K)

vox.com/science-and-health/2020/1/7/21003272/space-x-starlink-astronomy-light-pollution
Elon Musk is allowed to launch up to 30,000 satellites, he launched around 300 and they are visible right now, here's a simulation of the sky with 12,000 satellites.
youtube.com/watch?v=LGBuk2BTvJE
Astronomers are losing their minds, because taking footages of the sky became impossible, pic related.
The purpose is to provide satellite Internet access, but it will cost around 80 dollars a month. What does it mean? It means he is going to destroy our night sky to get more money, and people are praising him.

>In the near future, there could be 50,000 or more small satellites encircling the Earth, and for purposes other than delivering internet. Could some company arrange bright satellites in the sky to spell out the name of a popular soda? Maybe. There’s no global ban on space advertising.

How do you feel about that?

Attached: ann19035a.jpg (1280x971, 193.79K)

Astronomers are getting BTFO with this sat. constellation. lol

This is positive acceleration. Tens of thousands of Astronomers going to get TEDPILLED in an instant.

so do you guys do anything other than shill teds books and post memes

If we told you...

Really good meme user....

There are a just couple of typos though:

Second bubble:

'....terrible places ONE tiny step....'

'....going to encroach right UP to the point....'

'....encroach again, right UP to the point....'

Third bubble:

'....back 3 miles....'

Not a native English speaker obviously, BUT, perhaps it should read:

'....3 miles back....'

.... pretty sure that is the proper grammar; it would be great if angloanons could confirm. NOT SURE though.....

Solid meme, mate.

For now, no. We're still a new general, user. We gotta start with small steps.

YOU HAVE MY BUS

Attached: Into-the-Wild-Bus-.jpg (960x638, 106.34K)