About Charlemagne and Varg

I don't understand why Varg and larpagans get so butthurt because of Charlemagne, he was germanic too and he was a good king and military leader, there are no arguments against the best medieval emperor aside of larping and ignorance.

Attached: oil-Charlemagne-limewood-collection-Albrecht-Durer-Nurnberg.jpg (739x1600, 378.17K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pI6D_kgM_Zg&app=desktop
users.trytel.com/~tristan/towns/florilegium/flor00.html
sourcebooks.fordham.edu/sbook.asp
guides.nyu.edu/c.php?g=276597&p=1844929
lawlibguides.usc.edu/emld
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

probably because they're retards nostalgic for the dark ages, Charlemagne was more than a good king he brought about a golden age for europe and made it actually not shit in comparison to what it was.

Varg is a faggot

Attached: 1583876956713.jpg (607x608, 160.88K)

Charlemagne was a good dude but also retarded and was easily manipulated by the jews.

Charlemagne was Jewish

Attached: TeenageVarg.gif (320x240, 2.77M)

His Kingdom was rural, the jews never get so much power as poltards claim, in fact he needed them to get money for military campaigns and to reform the administration
>t. Varg

Attached: 91EqLmif0OL._AC_SL1500_.jpg (1500x1103, 397.12K)

>He was Germanic
Exactly, he was a traitor and ( violent ) servant of the Jews. He was actively killing Germans that didnt accept Christianity.

He's had a few things to say but the more I hear his views I am convinced he is an idiot.

Charlemagne declared it illegal for christians to charge interest on loans but jews were exempt from this. He was cucked. Also youre a memeflag kike.

He has many enemies even within the "Movement" but at the end of the day, he lives and breathes 1488. That's a lot more than most less abrasive personalities in the far right can say. Varg says things I dont agree with like being critical of Lanz von Liebenfels for having previously been a monk, but its minor disagreements in the grand scheme.

Attached: Varg_twitterimg.png (675x778, 648.13K)

Charlemagne was a fictional character. Most of England’s history was fabricated for propaganda purposes.

*barbarians that after getting conquered, were the biggest supporters of the Holy Roman Empire, yes, the Saxons were an important part of his empire.

Reminder too that he fought against the biggest threats and enemies of european societies in that age, the Islam and the Avars.

>barbarians
mutt opinion discarded

>manipulated by the jews.
Hello retard alert? I think you overestimate the jews, they were of course happy to claim greater wealth but the idea that Charlemagne was "manipulated by the jews" instead of out of an economic necessity is lunacy and why people don't take this board seriously.

People be honestly expecting medieval kings to know about central banking. They new about interest slavery, hence no Christians were allowed to commit it because of its sinful nature, but its necessity could not be denied. The jews amassed power through this but it's another stupidly held belief that every single rich jew got his wealth from Charlemagne, jews were rich already, and they were rich after, and battles continued to occur between the two; Christians and Jews.
\
Charlemagne is a Carlylian hero of history, h is a great-man, and that cannot be denied.

fuck off retard. race traitor. how is mass slaughtering thousands upon thousands for a foreskin hungry semitic jew deity from the Middle East a good thing?
massacre of Verden was one of the greatest medieval wholesale slaughters in ALL medieval fucking history. over 5,000 estimated, defenseless, surrendered Saxon Germans just killed to appease a jewish god from the Middle East. you're fucked in the head. your demon god will never be satisfied
retards like you deserve to be raped
sage

Basically the same that many roman emperors did, the jewish economic lobby started even before of christianity, he literally did the same than the emperors, kings and caliphs that preceded him and the ones from his age

>I don't understand why Varg and larpagans get so butthurt because of Charlemagne
Because he was black and a king.

Attached: nigger_delusions.jpg (973x1285, 282.21K)

Anyone who is so obsessed with any slight hint of Christian (or vice versa) is without a doubt a retard and shouldn't even be taken into consideration.

Such a plot twist

Fpbp

I think that obsession is warranted. Christians have proven themselves to be perfectly ok with miscegenation and promotion of the "equality of man" doctrine.

Attached: Wehrwolf_Jugend_9.png (659x832, 850.28K)

>why Varg and larpagans get so butthurt because of Charlemagne
jews hate strong christian men

Attached: indexi.jpg (719x715, 89.72K)

I mean, his ultimate goal for white people is also to have us hide out in the woods and shit in holes in the ground until we end up cornered Ruby Ridge style one by one so idk man, might not be the most practical philosophy to follow.

1488 is christian

Attached: pitty.jpg (480x360, 22.96K)

he killed white people for being white and not worshiping Jews.

>burning cathedrals, european artistic and cultural patrimony
Reminder that larpagans are a bunch of edgy teenagers that would be lynched by his forebears for being a bunch of heretic fedoras

From a pagan historian
youtube.com/watch?v=pI6D_kgM_Zg&app=desktop

Stop being an idiot

Attached: aa7fddb7e19553db3cda9e96ee31063e.jpg (508x772, 159.63K)

Attached: Charlemagne_CrimesAgainstGermany.png (712x301, 32.27K)

no

>I think that obsession is warranted. Christians have proven themselves to be perfectly ok with miscegenation and promotion of the "equality of man" doctrine.
>and posts a picture of a burning church
Why do you do this? Evola wasn't this retarded, and neither was Hitler; both of them would be disgusted by the burning of a church, European history and religion and art as some sort of celebration? Not to mention the idiocy of seeing Christianity as some sort of name under which every essence of supposed evil and destruction lies(though of course Evola was still anti-Christian was Hitler was not).

Even if what I have now said is wrong, the entire mental aesthetic of your post is decadent and plebeian.

Pagans seek to correct the Jewish lie that was forced on our forefathers. By being pagan we free them from their chains

>He was actively killing Germans that didnt accept Christianity.
Is that meant to be a bad thing?

>muh evil Charlemagne killed white people
>The romans killed white people, the proto-indoeuropeans killed white people, Hitler killed white people, the greeks killed white people, etc etc etc

Ok retard

I don't think STJ or the golden one are completely right themselves but it shews from intelligent the appreciation of what is evidently good. These autistic socially outcasted teenagers who try on new ideology's like clothes have no appreciation for what is true, like a suicidal muslim.

yeah its literally locking in the year the inquisition started
god I hate nufags

Attached: polT.jpg (300x100, 41.52K)

the Christian reveals his true form

>By being pagan we free them from their chains
my ancestors were white christians... they didnt wear chains jamal lol

Attached: bf2.gif (250x257, 1.89M)

Free for what? To worship phallic demons?

Attached: Frej_Rällinge.jpg (1327x2000, 157.83K)

you don't understand. He killed them because they were white. It's not some territorial dispute

>Hoberborean
>nooo how dare you wage war just leave us to be stronk men and conquer each other and fight apart from any idea of moral identity let us just fight because stronk like how it always was nooooooooooo!
A joke.

you must not have very many ancestors

free from worshiping phallic Jewish cow demons

>Charlemagne declared it illegal
Uhh no sweatie not thats a Church law from before his time. The historically illiterate bagan who needs to spew his opinions strikes again

>the Christian reveals his true form

Attached: 1583821443519s.jpg (125x96, 2.43K)

>Survive the jive
pic related.
Hitler's situation was different than now. Germany was still German, and "equality Christianity" was basically kept in check and being made obselete.

Attached: 234352.png (742x846, 102.73K)

Yeah and how many ancestors of yours were pagan, ey? Hah, oh yeah just a few hundred years back you can trace them and everything I'm sure.

Those "stronk" ancestors which you so continually parade about with pride would have banished you for your anti-Christianism.

OH NO HE FOUND ME OY VEY CALL IT OFF BACK TO ISRAEL

>you must not have very many ancestors
geee guess not moshe

The Vikings were the traitors. They spent hundreds of years murdering Whites until converting. After that they provided great Crusaders to literally kill Jews.

Which worked for everyone. Except Jews of course.

Charlamagne wasn't English.

You are thinking of Arhur.

I SHED THE BLOOD OF FOUR THOUSAND SAXON MEN

>t. History Channel

we could tell the whole time... you glow and hate jesus

>Charlemange's mom and wife were merovingians
No they fucking weren't. And they leave out that Charles had already conquered saxony and they swore allegiance. Those were fucking rebel cowards who bent the knee then chimped out the moment Charles entered spain to campaign against arabs and basques.

not once did i praise them for being 'stronk'. My ancestors that were pagan greatly outnumber those that were Christian. Know your full history. I don't hate Christians, but I do hate Christianity. I would never burn a church but i would burn a torah (bible)

>swarthoid with (((brown eyes))) like pic related
>germanic

Charlemagne wasn’t English but he was likely invented by Italians or anglos in the Middle Ages to cope with their lack of cool history. There’s no reliable record of anything before 1400.

alfred the great**

You guys are so fucking stupid. You'll grow out of your Doos Vult phase. Not everyone that doesn't worship Jews is a jew retard

Charlemagne was pretty dope

He had the irminsul destroyed

>Noooo, You can't unify Europe and stop the centuries of civil war to begin Reconquista!
-Some utter retard

He invaded Saxon lands hoping they convert to christianity and stop being savages, they "accepted" his rules amd when he left them to going to fight against muslims in north Spain, these savages killed the saxons that converted into Christianity, the priests, the governors, etc and started a guerrilla warfare against him. What Charlemagne did? The same that muh based roman pagan Augustus did to celtiberians, kill a lot of them to fright them, and it worked.
He was stronger, he have imperial projects, he unified Europe and created an entire civilization (all central Europe {iberia, France, Germany, Italy, Britain, etc} were influenced by charolingian period and ideals. Without Charlemagne, there is no european civilization aside from mediterranean societies from antiquity, without him muslims would have conquered Italy and other zones in France, he and his father and grandfather were the strong rulers of their period.

He worshiped a false Jewish religion and forced it upon Europeans.

/Thread

Attached: Screenshot_20200329-020253.png (1080x2160, 1.2M)

>"equality Christianity" was basically kept in check
No you retard it literally didn't exist, just like "equality norse paganism" only exists now because the dominant philosophical and spiritual direction of the times and some level of civilisation determinsm- just like a lizards corpse rots in such a particular way to it, as a trees equivalent does. Blaming Christianity is retarded, because 1. for almost the entire history of European Christianity the very definition of it was irrevocably intertwined with moral action and 2. the Christian religion itself shows this and any attempt to make it a self-destroying image of peace is disingenuous at best.

The whole idea of Christianity "cucking" is almost entirety a post-war creation and itself has been a product of the infestation of a conscious satanism(which of course never achieves anything or can be taken seriously) in our movement. Literally all these "national action" movements have been infested with it by autists like 09A.

There’s a plethora of medieval document from angland before 14th century

I don't think he knows who that is. He probably thinks England was ruled by Saber from the Fate series.

Without a doubt the church muddled things with edits and removing whole parts of history but its without a doubt the guy existed there mentions of him in Arab and Byzantine texts as well. And why the fuck would Anglos write about a mainland kind for their own history? Do you have any idea how fucking stupid you sound despite trying so hard to seem knowledgeable.

Attached: 1584746332481.jpg (1570x1536, 396.38K)

do you know what kike means plebbit frog faggot?

Attached: datplebbitglow.jpg (190x266, 7.21K)

Naw youll grow out of your too-edgy-for-atheism stage or become a methfiend biker like all american bagans.

>users.trytel.com/~tristan/towns/florilegium/flor00.html
>sourcebooks.fordham.edu/sbook.asp
>guides.nyu.edu/c.php?g=276597&p=1844929
>lawlibguides.usc.edu/emld

*and
*he had imperial projects
*(all central and western Europe {...})

I don't have the time to write out the entire argument against chridtianity as it will take up too many paragraphs simple as us that Christianity is an alien foreign imperialist semite religion.

Attached: 1585472445160.webm (320x240, 2.71M)

"I hate pagans it'd be cool to see them die. I rather have a brown christian Europe than a white pagan Europe."

>Christianity is Jewish and is spiritual slavery

"HES GLOWING HES JEWISH HIS A NEWFAG HES RETARDED"