Reminder to make sure you include "cvg" in the file name every time you post any new thread, anons. This is the only surefire way to kill that cancerous general, because this way they'll never be able to find their cancer threads in the catalog (if enough people do this, of course) and will eventually move away.
> I'm mixing up my gifts to you today. Have an Aqua. OH WOW! Very tasty. One thing: > why do nip illustrators do that "reflected white dot" on tits and thighs? Is it to give it more depth?
>> why do nip illustrators do that "reflected white dot" on tits and thighs? >Is it to give it more depth? This and to make them look shiny
Luis Cook
>who called for the infrastructure bill first- Nancy or Donald
I'm trying to figure that out...Blimpf apparently floated the idea in early 2018 after the GOP passed their tax cut bill...something like $1.5 trillion worth of infrastructure projects
I don't really know myself. I think maybe it's to attract more attention. You'd have better luck asking an actual drawfren than moi. >and here's that Smith lady from Monster Musume >I know you like her too
Bean Bag Buccaneers is a two player children's game, the object of which is to pick up your treasure chest on the central island and sail back safely.
Each player has a giant sailing ship as their main game piece. Each ship has a removable sail, two trigger-action side panels, and a huge spring-driven cannon. Players take turns moving forward along a prescribed track and shooting bean bags at their opponent's ship. A hit on one of the side panels will force it to pop off and give the player a free shot at the other side; a hit forcing the sail off becalms the ship for a turn.
To add to the pirate flavor, each player also has an eye patch. Wearing these will slightly affect depth perception and add a marginal bit of sport to the shooting.
This game retailed for the somewhat impressive sum of $16 back in 1962. With its huge plastic ships (close to a foot long), giant vinyl play mat, and the eye patches, it may well stand as one of the more overproduced games of the early 1960s. Bean Bag Buccaneers.
> who called for the infrastructure bill first- Nancy or Donald > I'm trying to figure that out...Blimpf apparently floated the idea in early 2018 user, Trump called for a 1.5T infrastructure bill in his bloody campaign and transition site
the problem of saying the US navy guarantees against defaults is that the value of the default loss is less than the benefit the navy offers. let's take china, the largest foreign holder of our debt (5.6% of it): if we default, telling them we can't pay the 1.18 trillion dollars we owe them as of a few years ago, they are going to weigh >is the benefit i get from the US navy greater than the 1.18 trillion they just robbed from me? and if the answer is ever "no," which it could very well be in their case, you just lost a creditor. every foreign nation will have to do this, and some may be willing to eat the loss, some might say up ours and depend on their own force additionally a third of the debt is owned by your own citizens, only a third owned by foreign governments. i do not think they would be happy about losing 6.289 trillion dollars as of a few years ago: the value of a lot of things would plummet, which is owned in the form of our currency and bonds and etc. that would be a massive blow to private industry: essentially it's like putting a massive tax on people, saying it's for the good of the benefit of the military's security. the government may survive, but it's at the heavy cost of the citizens (the same ones crying for the default, not realizing how much that would hurt them) the intragovernmental holdings (around the last third) might be the most "painless" debt to default on, but that's the welfare payments that anyone rational despises. i'd love to be rid of those, but how happy do you think the citizens would be if you suddenly nullified >social security >medicaid and etc.? that'd be for the best in the long run, but your current citizens will cry bloody murder - just look at how much welfare begging is going on right now. if any default were to happen though, it should be on this section of the debt: with that and no more welfare, we'd actually be running a budget surplus
Oh what a pickle for the EU, cannot say the virus is not hyped but cannot say free movement of ppl can carry on seeing as any virus renders the free movement of ppl obsolete.
For me, it's the McChicken. The best fast food sandwich. I even ask for extra McChicken sauce packets and the staff is so friendly and more than willing to oblige.
One time I asked for McChicken sauce packets and they gave me three. I said, "Wow, three for free!" and the nice friendly McDonald's worker laughed and said, "I'm going to call you 3-for-free!".
Now the staff greets me with "hey it's 3-for-free!" and ALWAYS give me three packets. It's such a fun and cool atmosphere at my local McDonald's restaurant, I go there at least 3 times a week for lunch and a large iced coffee with milk instead of cream, 1-2 times for breakfast on the weekend, and maybe once for dinner when I'm in a rush but want a great meal that is affordable, fast, and can match my daily nutritional needs.
I even dip my fries in McChicken sauce, it's delicious! What a great restaurant.
Jesus, what a terrible home in the background. Looks like soulless postmodern Judaism with a queer rainbow splashed on that one picture on the right. How do people live like that? What does that do to a man's soul?
Jaxson Myers
N-nani!?
Ethan Baker
It was taking too long for left-wing MSM to start with that
I don't like how Trump treats the FED like his own piggy bank. He's in love with low interest rates when we know that low interest rates cause market miscalculations and recessions (ABC theory).
Also, I don't like that he's in love with Israel. How do you guys cope with that?
> they are going to weigh > is the benefit i get from the US navy greater than the 1.18 trillion they just robbed from me? user, plz. Their first weighting will be on > can I renegotiate even with a haircut and stretch this through 20 years instead of 10? Again, see Argentina, Greece and Portugal. Imagine worst case scenario, China says > well US, I won't be buying any sovereign debt of yours anymore In 35 milliseconds the US would find a pretext for some intervention on Hong Kong, Taiwan and would stir up shit in that particular region of the globe greatly increasing the valuation of the US Navy
> additionally a third of the debt is owned by your own citizens That one you can escape by BRRRRR printing it away as both their own debts and their assets are denominated in US dollars.
That's all conjectures tho, to give you an example from a former superpower in that exact same position [1]: > In 1891 a financial crisis led Portugal to abandon the gold standard and partially to default by cutting interest payments on domestic and foreign debt . As a consequence, the country was banned from borrowing in international financial markets until an agreement with foreign bondholders was reached in 1902 Said agreement was a renegotiation of the outstanding debt that was finally paid in 2002 or so. Now notice, I'm not saying that's the fate of the US as they greatly outrank Portugal in natural resources, human capital and military prowess, only that even in the worstestest case scenario most creditors would rather to renegotiate than to lose everything
And there two reasons that happened. Regulations prohibiting discriminatory lending and low interest loans encouraging sub prime loans and other riskier activities
Yes, but there’s nothing wrong low interest loans. It’s going to the wrong people that the problem is. The niggers and shitskins don’t care what the interest is, they just care about getting the rims
Nathan Fisher
>tfw will never in my life experience American Fast Food joints which are supposed to be 1 Million times better than the Burger King/McD duality we have here
