do yall agree with this pic? if not, why? also i heard american education system teaches kids it was usa who bucked nazi germany in ww2.
Do yall agree with this pic? if not, why...
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
They do, Canadian schools do too
Sure if you replace the commie dinosaurs target with themselves
Yeah.
USA public school barely teaches shit desu, it's daycare.
It makes smart kids self-teach and forces them to be independent.
They do. They also try to brainwash people about the Holocaust.
Foreigners who move here can see through the bullshit though, a very small few of us Americans who have the balls to "think the unthinkable" can too.
Canada is like America’s effeminate brother
>UK is the deformed Rex from Walking with Dinosaurs
priceless
We did it boys we didn't get crushed in Belgium by the German counter attack! Therefore we won the war!
Somewhat accurate, britian and usa did pull their weight. Germany lost in russia largely due to over extension more than anything, and also an insane sacrifice by the russians to turn the tide of their invasion. Societs were very poorly equippped, only a third had a rifle on them, they would pick up the rifle of one of their comrades that died.
Without supplies from USA soviets would have lost. Lend lease was so important
They really drill hard into kids that racism is the highest form of evil. The Nazis were bloodthirsty murderers led by the most evil psychopath on the earth and that "oh no NOT THE POOR JEWSS... THEY WERE JUST MINDING THEIR OWN BUSINESS BEFORE THEY WERE THROWN MERCILESSLY INTO THE BLENDER".
I blame the flouride in the water though for dumbing down the Americans.
No. Russians were getting waxed until US saved them with lend lease. Even general Zhukov, said the war would've been lost without Lend Lease.
i love that France is a chicken
There’s no blanket “this is what every person is taught”... lots of vastly different schools in Murica. Yeah if you’re at a public school with a stressed out history teacher who does the bare minimum, the above is a possible way you’d learn the war went. But I had great history teachers who explained top to bottom left to right how it all went down
Based
America is the only nation that matters. The British's only contribution was stalling and the Soviet's dying.
We get taught that France pussied out and we had to go heroically save them, but did they really, or did they want to side with Germany but didn't want to do it officially due to alliances?
Change the commie dinosaur to dodos and this is more accurate.
We had to fight on both sides of the east coast and west coast.
It's fine if you replace the top caption with
>How Americans think WW2 was
OBJECTIVE WWII POWER RANKINGS
1. Germany
2. USA
3. USSR
4. UK
5. Japan
6. France
7. Italy
8. China
9. Netherlands
10. Canada
But, but, but, that newspaper from before Hitler was born said there were 6 million victims? There are many newspaper articles from before he could tie his own shoes that say the same. This surely cannot be a lie...
Shut the fuck up, your peasant nation is only around because daddy USA gave you tools.
Half of France wanted. It be like if Putin invaded the US. Half the Americans would be secretly glad that they can lynch gays again.
actually it's both: ruskies kicked our arses in the east and subverted the poor in our vassal regions - while we were incompetent enough to let this happen
while the murricans supported the hell out of the western allies denying us oil and important resources - and on land they basically did the same as the ruskies by throwing masses of soldiers and weapons at us
Not just the USA
The legacy of the Cold War is that people are generally ignorant of the accomplishments of the USSR
Also Japan shouldn't be that small. The same Japan absolutely embarrassed Russia in earlier conflict by sinking their fleet, and forced Russia to surrender. Completely humiliated them.
>quick quiz
guess how many hours D-day lasted before they took control of the bunkers
2 hours?
Regardless of whether you like Nazis or not. You have to be impressed how they took on 3 world superpowers and could have won.
It's neither.
France got BTFO, very hard and very quickly.
The puppet state and government in exile duality was essentially similar to pretty much every other country that was conquered.
In the US they just drone on and on about muh holocaust. Nothing else.
I'm not even joking.
It's not actually called holocaust class, but it probably should be.
I hate the teachers, and education system in this country.
America is Canada's special needs brother
Only a retard would send their own to die for another nation, retard
No, that's not how it really was either. What you really have is a bunch of white brothers fighting while a merchant rubs his hands.
I hate the "______ education" meme because the vast majority of people will never ever take the initiative to learn more than what they were instructed to learn. It's just not a favored mindset in the hivemind world we live in.
You could watch a 2 hour documentary about WW2 and learn more about it than in all of secondary school. You could read primary sources from WW2 and learn more than most people will ever know.
/thread
Canada is like a stillborn that America carries around because it has downsyndrome
Yeah, it was really a team attack. We did it together, although it was major overkill. Japan was actually a threat, Germany was just outmanned.
No, Americans became dumber sometime during WW1
sorry man, they really had no shot at all. They had enough for maybe britain, that is all.
America had too much money
Russia had too many men and too much land
Britain was too stubborn
Also the aussies dont get enough credit, they've basically deployed with us in every conflict. Aussies have always had our back.
This. Western media likes to paint Nazi Germany as some kind of unbeatable force with limitless resources and the Allies as the spirited underdog carried by bravery and friendship. (basically Star Wars Empire and Rebel Alliance)
In reality, Germany was the spirited underdog with limited resources and the Allies had to throw the might of half the world at them to win.
Russia held out only because the US was giving them free weapons.
Same with Britain.
No it promotes the myth that the Soviets where the sole power in defeating Nazi Germany and the none of the other allies took part other than defeating Japan and Italy. It also promotes the myth that the USA was the dominant force in defeating Japan and Italy, this makes the sacrifices made by the other allies (mainly Britain and commonwealth soldiers such as the Anzacs and Canadians) seem almost trivial and worthless. Then lets not get started on it's portrayal of Japan as tiny when in actual fact Japan ruled the pacific up untill a point.
So no WW2 was not actually like this. Each country sacrificed a proportionate amount, there's a saying the WW2 was won by Russian blood, British intelligence and American steel.
It made me chuckle too. In fairness they never stood a chance, they were right next to Germany and just got steamrolled. The resistance made it very uncomfortable for occupying forces though
According to Sun Tzu, bad choices that are well intended may still lead to a loss.
Neither is quite true. American artillery is underrated.
it's no wonder they're popular on Reddit
The biggest swinging dick left standing when it's all said and done writes the history books.
Agreed. Japan was an absolute force. They humiliated Russia and sank their entire fleet, which was largest in world at time, in earlier conflict. Brits and Aussies dont get enough credit in the Pacific, and American lend lease doesnt get enough credit in Europe.
>nein! how could this happen?
>sir, you took on the world's most well-connected empire, the world's greatest industrial powerhouse, and the world's largest army
>the aryan people will persevere!
>self-inflicted gunshot wound from the fuhrer.gif
The U.S. should have stayed out of it.
What they did was more in line with material support for the "allies." Being across the ocean gave us the unique advantage of un-bombed industrial output, which could transport materials and manufactured items to the war-torn nations that were doing most of the fighting. The U.S. army was sent in when the final push was about to be made, simply because we wanted in on the spoils. This is true of the European theater, anyway.
when it came to the Pacific theater, the Russians basically harassed the Japanese forces on the mainland, while Chinese forces kept up the fight, being supplied by the U.S.
They were helped immensely by the U.S. engaging the Japanese all across the pacific, requiring them to pull back troops to defend.
It was the U.S. that pushed them back into Japan, then forced them to surrender using fire-bombing & 2 nuclear strikes.
I had a relative that was in WW2 in the European theater, and he told me that by the time the U.S. had gotten over there, the Germans were mostly beat.
Have you seen the battle of Khallin Gol? Japan got absolutly shit stomped by the soviets. Fuck they even struggled against chinese partisans.
Japans small arms and cannons just were too olde to functiom against a 20th century army
>do yall agree with this pic?
No.
>if not, why?
1. Germany wasn't united. While most factions called for ceasefire once the war broke out, once it became obvious that Hitler wanted to sell us out to the ((brits)) and murder any opposition, they began to resist actively. Modern history downplays this massively to uphold the myth of the german monsters.
2. The russians weren't a homogenous people either. They were dozens if not hundreds of tribes, united under one command in name only. At least once they got into germany, they had massive inner conflicts as well, mostly between western russians (of german, scandinavian or cossack descent) and eastern russians (slavs, monogolians etc). The most well-known result of this was that the western russians convinced the party to permit executing rapists on the spot (without process or regard for rank) after the eastern russians began violating civilians.
3. Also, France wasn't that uninvolved. While they didn't get much action with the germans, the american and british warcrimes on french civilians are well-known. Even american general Patterson (or whatever he was called) aknowledged them in his memoirs.
America
>sends troops to enforce unfair trade with South American nations
Truly believes
>builds bases all over Europe
In democracy and freedom
>enforces petrodollar by installing military bases in the Middle East after waging an unjustified war
For all nations
>controls global trade with the strongest navy in the history of the world
On the planet
en.wikipedia.org
you literally were wearing burlap and threatening germany with the weather instead of rifles.
>British intelligence
WW2 intel was awful.
I agree, Canada has downs. They claimed to be progressive but re-elected a dude that wears blackface so often he can't remember how many times it was.
You can't be serious. They were out numbered 3 to 1, and the Soviets still had more casualties.
mhm, just because you didnt win the battle doesnt mean the blood spilled was pointless. In reference to american lend lease i think it gets credited for what it was (sometimes overrated) but then again i dont know too much about so maybe it was bigger of a help than i thought
>Also the aussies dont get enough credit
True, and the Fijians, as well.
It's easy to look at the number of troops killed in WW2 and agree that Soviets did the heavy lifting, but think about where the financial resources of the Third Reich went - they spent a lot more resources on the air, sea, and espionage fight with the UK and US.
You spend too much time on Yas Forums. There is not a single person in America that would tolerate being invaded.
>Russians basically harassed the Japanese forces on the mainland
We didnt interact with japs at all until we finished with germs, after which we crushed their entire mainland forces and reached korean pacific shores in two weeks, after which you decided to nukes them before we invade their shit and make hokaidsk into eastern germany 2.0
emigrate faggot
British airpower is other option, but although the intel in ww2 was awful it did aid the allied effort in d-day. Maybe British deception and subversion of German intel had a bigger impact.
of course shitty USA education lied to 3 entire generations, why would they not? Muricans believe they saved the world while it was the soviet who actually won the war and had the biggest economical impact of having a third of their male population gone. The US did little more than drop a couple nukes on japan.
>do yall agree with this pic? if not, why?
Dinosaurs didnt fight in WW2.
>also i heard american education system teaches kids it was usa who bucked nazi germany in ww2.
The US entering the war turned the tide mainly due to propaganda and morale.
Its actually the same in WW1 and WW2. The Germans knew that the USA was a source of near infinite manpower and wealth for their enemies. Once they joined they knew the war wouldnt be over quickly and the German outllook changed very quickly from optimism to a looming sense of disaster.
Isn’t your country the one with the testosterone deficiency problems due to your use of exogenous estrogen usage in your meat industry?
General Zhukov himself said the war wouldve been lost with lend lease. We basically supplied and funded their entire army. Over 800 Billion dollars worth sent in today's money.
I was just pointing out to this guy
That the US isn’t sending troops to die for the other nation, but to exploit the other nation. I’d be upset too if I was irrelevant like Canada and the US basically did whatever it wanted when it wanted.
>WW2 intel was awful.
By the end of the war we were able to read all the German military radio messages and they had no idea we were doing it.
>massive inner conflicts as well, mostly between western russians (of german, scandinavian or cossack descent) and eastern russians (slavs, monogolians etc)
Take your meds, schizo.
>ww2
>2020
fuck off snutn
kys
But let's not forget 90k Brits surrendered to 30k Japs in the battle of singapore.
That's because jewrmans are dumb and Hitla was a homo.
You couldn't have invaded them, you didn't have the equipment or the ships.
More importantly, we wouldn't have allowed it, which we didn't.
Patton was right, we should have immediately gone to war with Russia and annexed the entire region.
It would have solved so many future problems.
only simple ones. higher commands didnt use enigma
On all sides yes, but slightly less awful on the British side. See the Enigma code, operation mincemeat, gunnerside, wooden airfields and many more.
It's an allosaur you ignoramus
My school's never taught that about the US. We focused on the US WW2 history though. Also the kikes have mandatory two weeks of Holocaust shit in the US. I remember in 5th grade in 2003ish we were taken to the Holocaust museum in DC.
You know little about the Pacific theater.
Remember, Jew media emphasizes the European theater over the Pacific, simply because they claim 6 gorrillian Jews were murdered by the Germans. I'm surprised they didn't try to tell the same lie about the Japanese, but maybe they didn't want to push their luck.
The island-to-island fighting in the Pacific was particularly bloody and fierce, and the Japanese were well known for never surrendering, even when there was no hope.
American schools love to continue the lie of the "holocaust" so they concentrate on Europe & only briefly touch on Japan.
There should be a larger nasalraptor-rex chasing the soviet T-Rexxes.
Put American guns on all the Soviets and it's accurate.
Where did the mean Englishman touch you? Show me on this doll.
Russia did a lot less then people make out. Yes they won important battles but they were mostly on the defensive while Western Europe and the US was more offensive. Either way the world would be better if Germany won or if Germany didn’t ally with Japan.
It would be more accurate if you put nazi-Rex in the middle since Hitler decided to attack the Russian and split his forces.
But it’s all moot. The US had a basic nuclear arsenal at that point. Germany would have gotten erased had the ground fighting gone the other way.
>use of exogenous estrogen usage in your meat industry?
They use bovine growth hormone to push the cattle to greater size more quickly. Estrogens would do the opposite.
In any case, bovine hormones don't work on humans, and they're destroyed in the cooking process, anyway.
What did they use instead?