Hey Yas Forums, I'm writing a paper for my liberal university and I'm operating under the guise of being unbiased and bipartisan, but my hope is to change the mind of some of my peers regarding their stances on homosexuality. A lot of them really are good people and they've just been mislead into believing that this sickness is normal. I'm not terrific with words and I'm kind of passionate about this so I lack the subtly necessary to make it work. How would you, in an academic way, structure this argument?
Need academic arguments against homosexuality
its only gay if your the receiver
I said academic, retard, that argument looks like a middle schooler wrote it.
Stop sucking cock. All of you are pedophiles, and shall be thrown into the lake of fire with a milestone around your neck.
theres literally nothing wrong with gay sex...
...unless you argue from christian morals and tradition but then homosexuality is only on par with masturbation or premarital sex
or from traditional family, but then, again, on par with premarital sex
HIV, pregnancy. It should be obvious. Cum in the vagina and you make baby. Legit, that's it.
Maybe look at what EMJ has written. Academia is unlikely to accept what you write, they are too emotionally invested in egalitarian daydreams.
they fuck poop.
they literally put their penises into someone else's poop.
Could I get a link?
this too. imagine the infections in their urethras...
This shit is flaccid. Obviously this isn't going to work with their perversion of the libertarian idea that people should be left to their own devices. I need philosophical, moral, ethical arguments.
You don't need arguments. Trust the Plan. Operation STORM begins April 10 and the Internet will be shut down for 3 days while military takeover arrests pedo and celebs. It's over. New Constitution will be signed and homosex will be outlawed and faith and Q will restore the Republic.
in addition to the negative effects of sodomy, you need to "prep" for it. had a gay ""friend"" at one point that did so. that's not natural. iirc, women think that it hurts to get a penis in there. if someone can help me with debunking the "male g-spot" that would be awesome.
Go hide in a bunker you fucking nutjob.
Arsehole/rectal cancer, anal leakage, anal-induced hemorrhoids, 50% of gays have half of their sexual partners being complete strangers and usually have 100 sex partners (find the screencap on the degenerate gay sex life), higher proportion of gays were abused as children than the normal public (gays reproduce by molestation).... something to go off of to show that nothing is natural about it. A queer could still argue that they should still be allowed to destroy their arseholes in a free society but this is something you can help to bolster whatever argument you’re concocting
>archive.is
write your own.
Use the CDC statistics on the prevalence of STD's amongst homosexuals. The human body didn't evolve to have anal sex with frequent and multiple partners, and the evidence that is the rate at which HIV and other diseases like syphilis occurs in gays. That one basic safety concern alone is a pretty solid argument that deliberately practicing homosexuality is immoral. Much less encouraging others (especially kids) to do it, or actively suppressing the health risks for PR purposes.
>philosophical, moral, ethical arguments
>perversion of the libertarian idea that people should be left to their own devices
contradiction.
Bruh, they're literally liberal idols. Gay people are in the IDENTITY of liberals. No argument is going to fly your case.
You could argue HIV and trans death rates. People might argue with some retarded lesbian trans thing.
Shut up nigger kys
Nobody goes to college to listen to what other people have to say they just want their degree so they can retire and fuck around in their small house.
if you have to trick/manipulate people into believing men sticking their dicks in the asses of other men is disgusting then it's not worth talking about
pleasures pleasure bud, give me 5 minutes with my tongue up your arsehole and you'll be slipping around in your own precum guarateed
How many sexual partners do gays have on average compared to straights?
the libs did this somehow over the past 4-5 years...
In this case then you’re going to need to develop some system (think the ideal state in the republic as an example) and use this as a way to show that a normal family that isn’t fag infected is the natural law of things. Husband, wife, children. To “convince” them you need basically a thesis that is so nuanced and developed that Plato would be proud. I doubt this is worth it though. Just write about how converting white nationalists to being gay will help to improve the number of women in stem or something like that
Me like taking it into the poopoo. Try it
butts aren't for fuckin
The belief in a gay gene puts them in the genetic determism camps, right along side the mean ol' racists.
Double down and say it's wonderful population control, eventually the gay gene will be bred out instead of forcing men with the gay gene to breed or abort all gay babies.
Their is a theory that all or most homosexuals were sexually absused as children. I havent done the research but if you can make a case that we shouldnt be glorifying the psychological damage inflicted on these people
the idea of a gay gene is the most self-contradicting and absolutely RETARDED BRAIN-DEAD GARBAGE I've ever heard.
and it's still disgusting and still not worth talking about except in derision
This thread is pretty much proof that all of you are fucking retards
I 100% agree I expected better. All I got were reddit-tier arguments.
You're on Yas Forums looking for material for an academic paper dipshit. Did you honestly think you'd find something of credible value here?
Go do some actual research and stop expecting us to do your work for you
That's the fucking point. It's clear as day that it's wrong...
Existence is the only virtue and homos are on a path to non existence.
shits fucked
>I need great chess openings that I can use to checkmate pigeons
>halp, Yas Forums!
This isn't 8chad, Yas Forums is too fast right now everyone being NEETs during a happening. Not going to get serious stuff.
Debunk the gay gene dude, that shit will be easy and you can spin it to make the cucks clap.
>checkmate pigeons
?
nigger
Write down some of the things Sam Hyde is saying here. This is a good one because he tailored the arguments for his liberal audience.
>likely sexual abused at a young age.
>Behavior influenced by environmental factors and people who do not question their morals.
>Sexual aggression with gay males, leading to more partners and promiscuity.
>Contributes to decreasing birthrates
>Spreading of STDs, including parasites.
>Subversion of institutions to combat people who resist their ideas.
>A willingness to expose children to the same sexual trauma they went through.
you cannot make an academically unbiased, deductive argument against homosexuality.
You can however make an academically tolerable inductive argument.
It's not about convincing them that it's the path of least resistance to reject all homosexuals and all of homosexuality. It's about convincing them to choose to do so as a result of seeing it as a risky prospect with bad outcomes likely.
>discuss HIV prevalence
>discuss lack of sustainability (reproduction)
>discuss source of homosexuality amongst most men (child abuse)
>discuss the damage to culture homosexuality has been for the united states
Don't just say "fags are bad." Explain why. I won't write your essay for you, but those are the elements you should use to convince people. It's up to you to find the sources and counterarguments against what I said, and again, build an INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT, not some shitty synopsis of Sodom and Rome.
newnownext.com
The ethos of homosexuals is literally that of pleasure for its own sake, as well as the lack of any real perspective. They practice their lifestyle out of resentment for the society that they think oppresses them.
It is a weaponized lifestyle against what they call "hetero-normative" society that produces healthy people out of spite for that society and its healthy people, and the fact that heterosexuality exists imprints itself on their psyche, and it drives them math.
Plus they don't naturally reproduce among themselves; they have to recruit others into accepting and practicing their lifestyles. They try to bribe their mutual pride and hubris to keep themselves in a perverse sort of community whose entire existence is predicated on a perverse enjoyment of sex for its own sake, rather than using it as a tool to bring people together and create children naturally.
Just think about the fact that major pharmaceutical companies are putting advertisements on national television for Prep and similar drugs that are designed solely so that homosexuals can have anonymous sex without getting diseases that are either life-threatening or require massive taxpayer funds so that they live on welfare for the rest of their lives while they continually take expensive drugs everyday and provide nothing for society
Ew
Arent gays like 60% of the pedophile population despite the gay community only accounting for 3% of the population
It causes prolapsed rectums
They also eat poop off the dick afterwards
Homosexuality is mental insanity
Giving in and accepting homos is just as bad as accepting the crazy schizo to whom his walls are talk to
>Need academic arguments against fags
just quote the Quran and Torah, then claim islamophobia and antisemitism against the teacher for low marks!