While I’ve been lurking on the Chan since ‘09, I usually used slower boards like /x/ or /lit/ so the opinions on here about Jews is new to me. Anytime I try to search info about why facts about the Holocaust were not true, I find white supremacy and mainstream stuff.
Where can I find good information about why pol sees Jewish conspiracy’s everywhere?
archive.is/UqlNe >"Jewish women were a prominent presence in the radical wing of the feminist movement of the 1960s, 70s, and 80s—only no one knew it."
This is the ONLY source of all of those who claim that "__women fantasize about rape__". An article written by a JEW sexual psychologist.
(((Michael Castleman))) >Women's Rape Fantasies: How Common? What Do They Mean? archive.is/lujYZ
This same jew they use as a source has also written other articles like these just to name a few. archive.is/5PpAT >Guess What May Help Change Conservatives’ Minds About Sex >Porn viewing by conservatives is associated with more liberalsexual beliefs.
archive.is/G5Woa >Does Viewing Porn Corrupt Teens? >More reasons that teen porn exposure is no cause for alarm:
archive.is/BFJRL >Evidence Mounts: More Porn, Less Sexual Assault
The actual study itself makes the following points which are not included in the (((article))).
>Taken as a whole, current literature on the content of rape fantasies is incomplete and contradictory. There is agreement that mental imagery of realistic violent rape is almost never an erotic experience (Bond & Mosher, 1986) and that nearly all women have no interest in acting out a realistic fantasy of rape (Gold et al., 1991).
Important points of note >The "fantasy" included intrusive thoughts driven by situational circumstances (walking alone at night and thinking if someone comes from behind etc)
>The sample including 21% women who had previously been raped.
>Identity of perpetrators against those who had intrusive thoughts about rape. >46% their partner >21% strangers of which only 11% of all who said they had intrusive thoughts were "completely erotic".
The key point is that the 21% of former rape victims account for the majority of intrusive thoughts with strangers of which only 11% is in an erotic "fantasy".
Adrian Lewis
wasted digis do you know what the barque of st peter is? do you know why they call them waves?
((())) Yes. Q is a CIA operation to keep the old white demographic engaged in politics. The government knows which demographic is most likely to vote. Voting is a tool of jews by which their puppet politicians gain legitimacy.
Trump is a subhuman puppet of jews. All politicians are puppets of special interest groups, namely jews and corporations.
Yes obviously. My point is that the same JEW who wrote that article is also the same JEW who took a 30 year old study if college girls, purposely distorted the findings to suggest that women "fantasize about rape".
Additionally there are now subversive white guys (wignats) who are pushing the same lies as that jew.
Luke Russell
yeah bud sure isn’t obviously autocorrect or anything
Jaxson Jones
so why make up these false studies? to make people ill?
Yes think! Jews subverted feminists so they could redirect their genuine concerns towards destructive ideas.
Jews always enter well meaning groups and assume control over them in order to use them as a weapon while also having the cover of that group's identity not their own (jews).
They are literally parasites.
Notice how people always bitch about "feminists" ..not JEWS who cloak themselves as "feminists" which is the appropriate criticism.
Hunter White
right, I get the hive mind aspect but who benefits from thinking shit like that? how would that benefit anyone?
Nolan Perry
>to make people ill? yes, if you build an evil hive and the bees make poison honey, those who consume it become ill the first thing a mason will do, is hire you and ask you to write the recipt in such a way as to avoid taxes. small tiny, incremental corruptions eventually add up to fucking dead kids and other crazy degenerate shit we dont even know about
so Jews redirected feminists from shit like voting and independence to the “sexual liberation” shit we see now?
Logan Perez
huh so what about shit like the holocaust? i get that getting the world to believe in it would give them a lot of leverage and power but did it happen at all then?
Jacob Baker
to observe is to change it corrupts your innocence but also theosophy.wiki/en/Egregore hegel has a similar theory that goes back to spinoza and then the lurianic kabbalah
Daniel Jackson
this is quite the rabbit hole innit?
Levi Thompson
250965428
this thread
Gavin Reyes
they care about that only as a second issue the holocaust was about fulfilling prophecy, settling a 200 year old grudge, creating and filling israel, and bringing forth their messiah en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome_and_Jerusalem
how do you avoid conforming to what they want out of you?
Daniel Hall
Yes. Democracy in a non homogeneous country is no longer a viable civic order for genuine government. It is very easy to divide and control people along race, gender and socioeconomic status with democracy in such a country. They do it through economic stressors. That is how they made it necessary for women to work instead of getting married young and having a family. That is how they make whites move every few years, constantly having to buy more and more expensive property to escape the non white criminals and issues. That is how they terrorize the average person into thinking that if they don't vote that their future will be made significantly worse.
Notice that they no longer suggest you're voting for an improvement, but terrorizing you into compliance with the prospect of their "opponent" winning. A system like that is obviously illegitimate.
If they use fear and threats to make you participate in a Civic process (democracy) which they directly benefit from (legitimacy) then you know it's time for a Revolution.
You can't have Nationalism without Socialism. You can't have Socialism without Nationalism (ethnic and cultural homogeneity) You can't have National Socialism without Revolution.
James Scott
>According to classical Jewish sources, the Hebrew year 6000 (from sunset of 29 September 2239[2] until nightfall of 16 September 2240[3] on the Gregorian calendar) marks the latest time for the initiation of the Messianic Age. The Talmud,[4] Midrash,[5] and the Kabbalistic work, the Zohar,[6] state that the 'deadline' by which the Messiah must appear is 6,000 years from creation. According to tradition, the Hebrew calendar started at the time of Creation, placed at 3761 BCE.[7] The current (2019/2020) Hebrew year is 5780. and because of this we are very likly to see them do this again only with nukes this time en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses_of_Crete
Jack Garcia
how do we cause change in a system like that?
Christian Sullivan
they want to destroy us so by living Its hard to explain, but once you learn what chabad and the jews in general want to have happen, its all very obvious in your position, learn as much as you can and unironically pray to Jesus to guide you and for a metanoia and do it with earnist and you will be surprised with how fast it falls into place for you rome is eternal, the jew isnt that will help you figure out some shit when you get there
Generally yes. It served as multiple purposes. They (jews) wanted to break apart the bond between men and women. They knew that first wave feminists had some legitimate grievances when presented in good faith, could bring men and women together. That would make it difficult for jews and corporations to implement their many other plans.
If men and women have a symbiotic relationship then jews can't them destruction as a coping mechanism. Men will not be watching porn if they had a natural relationship with their wife. Women would not be consuming jewish media, products and tv shows if they had families and the reassurance of a loving husband. Kids would not be open for subversive school lessons if they had intact families and present parents.
Jews infest everything in order to cause destruction, especially if it has the potential for good. The more important and critical an issue the more potential for jews to do damage.
Feminism had and could still have potential for good and progression. Women at the time, currently and in the future will have feminine needs and issues which requires sincere dialogue.
Blake Walker
Good. *Agnostic National Socialism (Revolutionary) is the only logical conclusion and path.
I don't understand which system you're referring to (a system like *that)?
If you're referring to this current system. It will self-destruct on its own but you should still do as much as possible to accelerate that. Do not vote for anyone, under any circumstance or for any reason (strategy or to "teach them a lesson). You should however, tell everyone about why you're not voting and that they shouldn't either. Prepare your loved ones for chaotic times and most importantly help them reconnect with their identity. They need to understand who they are and how they became that. They need to understand the significance of obligation, to themselves and their own.
If you're referring to a National Socialist State. It depends on how far along it is. If it has completed its Revolution then it would require minimal readjustments. People would already be very familiar with subversive elements and how to respond. People would give and do out of abundance.
These threads are just bait so they can catalogue and censor everything.
Lincoln Roberts
im not a Jew?
Luke Hernandez
I think the positive and perpetually present need of feminine ideals would be the feminism of the future.
Where women recognize their invaluable roles and abilities unique to them. While especially cognizant of what has, is and could destroy that. In a way, feminism of the future would focus on their health, their family, their relationship with men, their relationship with each other and their obligation as role models for the young women who will fill their position in the perpetual need for vigilance against subversive elements in society.
Feminists of the future ultimately would have an incredibly symbiotic relationship with strong men. They would reference each other in order to have a catalytic effect where men solve problems with men and women solve problems within their own.
Hudson Davis
Identity is the starting point of everything. What is your point?
Jason Gonzalez
so women simply being equal to men and there being no real difference to how the sexes treat their own and opposite sex?
One of the best books you can read, Kevin MacDonald is an extremely well written author who developed his views through research The book is third in a series of 3, the first being incredible in regards to evolutionary theory, how jews have collectively evolved and gandled themselves vis a vis other groups
His website is Occidental Observer
Joshua Peterson
((())) >Hitler was x What were the tens of millions of those who fought for an ideal?! Bitch, my great grandparents fought for the Axis because of what it stood for and who stood against them (jews / neo liberal globalists / communists / capitalists) not because Hitler had a twinkle in his eye. Don't even reply. You're a subversive rat.