Do you want total war?
Other urls found in this thread:
britannica.com
nationalvanguard.org
euromaidanpress.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
No , a spiritual war
My race is my religion.
Der totale Krieg.
Good but they lack faith
>voulez-vous une guerre totale
I have faith in my people, I will never despair.
Larp fags get the rope
>loses to based USSR
Yes, we know all about your Judaism. Lurk more.
Yes, the pajeets shall rise
Your larp rhetoric has been destroyed for years now. The only ones who are larping are antifa, except for Scalise and the failed ICE attack.
yes Boyd Rice
TOTAL WAR
The kikes days a numbered in minecraft.
>Do you want total war?
No. I want globalists treated like the mental disorder they are.
Lurk eternally, on Reddit.
>ICE raid
Wasn’t it some mentally deranged old mexishit too? Like it wasn’t some young buck and his left wing diversity squad.
Yea it was one of the more zombified boomer commies who fill the young peoples heads with their drivel, theres two kinds of antifas, larping basedboys who want to feel like they are rebelling and the hardcore ideologically and mortally committed communists. They will die for it, but there arent many of them. Most want free shit, people who want free stuff dont die for it, theyre materialists, hedonists in the end.
Fine, Basedgoys.
What you cant even fucking type s-0-y on this kiked site at all lol, god I hate cuckchan.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
OHNONONONONONO
Ilya Ehrenburg held no position in the Soviet government
When you lie so transparently it makes everything you've posted look circumspect
Youre a communist, your argument is invalid and not based in objectivity.
>logical fallacies
ok, keep dooming your own attempts at arguments
>leaftlet drop
>not endorsed by the state
>propaganda ministers dont speak in leaflet drops
Kay bud, Ill take David Dukes reputation over some admitted USSR supporter any day. Youre a Jew, Jews dont get to dictate us anything.
Look at this materialist faggot
No.
No, I just want to round up all the chinks and firebomb china until it looks like an ashtray. I dont need total war
>dictate us anything
right...
You could just not make false statements that threaten the integrity of your entire post. Don't call Ehrenburg a member of the Soviet government, just point out he was a Soviet journalist. In other words, use your brain.
Too soon.
According to the wiki Jew. Now tell me Bezmenov was a CIA agent or some bullshit and how Solzhenitsyn is a fraud, and how the holodomor never happened either. Youre a joke, nothing youve ever said is honest, youve never argued in good faith in your life. Youre what filters are made for, your words wont stop our physical opposition and youre no doubt some pencil necked faggot who will hide under a rock.
I think the lady doth protest too much.
What's your source he was a minister?
Not him. I believe you're right about Ehrenburg not being propaganda master for the Soviets, but that still doesn't dismiss his point. According to Wikipedia:
"His article "Kill" published in 1942 — when German troops were deeply within Soviet territory — became a widely publicized example of this campaign, along with the poem "Kill him!" by Simonov".
So it seems he did do propaganda for the Soviets, and he did encourage them to rape German women and women
David Duke, and that image is from a book, and I forget the one Duke got it from but he didnt invent it.
Heres Britannica.
britannica.com
>one of the most effective Soviet spokesmen to the Western world.
>spokesmen
He who speaks for the nation speaks propaganda.
>He was the top Soviet propagandist during the Second World War.
nationalvanguard.org
So no source, apparently. "Spokesmen" isn't a government position, and being a propagandist/journalist isn't either.
>Not him. I believe you're right about Ehrenburg not being propaganda master for the Soviets, but that still doesn't dismiss his point.
It damages his point when the first line is a blatant lie. Arguments need to be well-cited and secure or they fall apart. That's what I'm trying to point out to him.
Funny for somebody who accused his opponent of using fallacies to use them himself. You do know what the "fallacy fallacy" is, right?
If you actually cared for truth, you'd be able to look past the minor error (and I do mean minor, the US congress described Ehrenburg as "one of the Soviet's most prolific propagandists) and actually address the argument
And you, stop not arguing and just calling him and shill. I'm half convinced you're a lefty trying to make us look bad
Yes.
Meant for
I accept your concession. When you have a source, feel free to share it. Now so you know, the USSR's Central Committee *did* have a Agitation and Propaganda Section with a minister in charge of it. You can look up who these were.
Spoiler alert: Ehrenburg was not one of them.
Not a fallacy to point out fallacies, user. I've been addressing his poor argument for a while.
>but the Zionist US Congress says!
Wow, great source that also doesn't place him in government anyway.
I provided evidence, he ignored it, that means hes arguing just like a Jew. Weve been through this for years. The cap is from a book, it was on google, its apparently gone. Such is our existence where our books are burned by communists and they claim it never happened.
>I provided evidence, he ignored it
Actually I refuted it.
Like a Jew, you just ignore it and continue to provide no source that proves your argument.
The Chief Journalist is the title in Russia for the propaganda minister. Its semantics.
euromaidanpress.com
>Ilya Ehrenburg, A Russian Jew and “chief journalist” under Stalin as it were, urged Soviet troops to...
See cap above.
I would rather not live on half rations and have no rubber for cars or products the next 10 years.
>american
>ethnicity
youtube.com
OK Cantwerk.
DO YOU WANT THE TOTAL PREPP????
>The Chief Journalist is the title in Russia for the propaganda minister. Its semantics.
It isn't. At all. They literally had a member of the Central Committee who held that title.
You can literally read up on them. Andrei Zhdanov, for starters. Educate yourself.
>Not a fallacy to point out fallacies
But it is a fallacy to use an opponent's fallacy to ignore the meat of the argument. Yes, the picture said he was propaganda minster when he wasn't. But the argument is that the Soviet Union was giving propaganda to their soldiers which was clearly made to incite massacres. Whether or not you think Ehrenberg was a minster, it doesn't matter. You're nitpicking on a single point that's more less irrelevant to the greater discussion at hand.
Alright I take back what I said about you being a lefty
I live rather Stoicly. It is you who doesn't know what Total War is and against who is this war waged and for what cause?
The White race? The Same white race we argue on who is white?
Against the Chinese so that the Jew can stand atop us?
Against the Russian for the Jew?
Against the Jew who is landless slime that survived several erradication attempts?
Against a society of comfort that can bread and circus the masses?
>the meat of the argument
The meat of the argument, since I've never challenged what was written, was the incorrect assertion that Ehrenburg was a member of government and how making dubious claims can serve to undermine the body of text itself. Hell, what "greater discussion at hand" are you even talking about? No one has talked about massacres except him.
Try to keep up.
Heydrich to Himmler, semantics.
>Who ran the SS
Himmler
>Who also ran the SS
Heydrich.
You just said because of material reasons you wouldnt want to have a total war but you proclaim to be stoic. No.
>The White race? The Same white race we argue on who is white?
We dont, Jews do. Europeans are white, and so are Iranians.
>Against the Chinese so that the Jew can stand atop us?
Primarily against the Jew, Chinese can be deported, Jews cant be let to escape.
>Against the Russian for the Jew?
Pic related. No, not against Russians, who are white.
>Against the Jew who is landless slime that survived several erradication attempts?
Yes. The only thing Hitler did wrong was deporting Jews.
>Against a society of comfort that can bread and circus the masses?
Fuck yes. Bring it all down, de-pacify whites.
Except both of those were members of the ruling Nazi government. Not one government member and some journalist. Not a single reputable source lists Ehrenburg as part of the government. So when your claim rests on that assertion of authority, you shoot your own argument in the foot.
100% jew ape
Fuck you kike shil, exit Yas Forums now .
I got a 50 sac on some pipe hitting niggas that will push your nazi shit in faggot. Trust.
Yeah fuck having coherent arguments and proof, right?
yes
>Not a single reputable source lists Ehrenburg as part of the government.
based
the number 9 is coming to my mind...
