ITT

One building, two pillars

You mean the Dancing Israelis?

This is a must watch.

youtube.com/watch?v=F4CX-9lkRMQ

Attached: 1547032963460.png (1680x1050, 1.26M)

Attached: explosion 1.webm (1080x732, 1.23M)

Attached: plane cgi.webm (720x480, 2.47M)

Attached: missile pent.gif (852x568, 1022.8K)

I have the weirdest boner right now but what are you trying to prove?

They were Israeli.

Attached: Christopher-Bollyn.jpg (400x457, 44.2K)

Fake

Attached: sparks.webm (550x310, 2.45M)

Attached: 911-birthday.jpg (615x712, 49.5K)

why not?

They were Middle Easterners, fren.

could be idk

Attached: tower and ash.webm (640x360, 653.49K)

WTF?! THAT BUILDING LOOKS LIKE IT WAS BLOWN UP DEMOLITION STYLE? WHY IS NOBODY TALKING ABOUT THIS?

probably obscured by the light from the sun just like on earth during daytime, retard.

Attached: watch the ash.webm (640x480, 2.94M)

It looks weird to him because he doesn't understand physics at different scales.

That's not normal...

the accusation is that the planes were CGI

Why dont you bongs use words like "peculiar" anymore?

It had a fire inside it.

Attached: 1549456959691.gif (320x180, 1.76M)

the abrahamic faiths were a mistake

Attached: F72DB763-90B1-46F9-B996-BC00475D3B9D.jpg (681x1024, 102.19K)

Ouch
>My pride

I think you meant this one.

Attached: 1497428001885.jpg (1280x720, 222.53K)

And? The building in Dubai was on fire for 72 hours and that shit didnt fall

It because it sounds a bit queer.

Why do people who believe this is relevant not talk about how the top quarter of the building angles 30 degrees. That's not how you demolish buildings.

What difference does the plane being real or not make? The real question is who did it, which glow in the darks don't want you to find out. Boomer retard conspiracy theories are glowing Astro turfing. Don't fall for the memes.

The concussive forces of two giant fucking skyscrapers falling down next to the WTC7 probably didn’t help it stay upright, along with the fires.
End of fucking story, retards.

>"I've the most peculiar errection at the moment. Is there a point to your babble?"

It also had it's foundation and central pillar cracked when building 2 fell.

Two massive skyscrapers didn’t fall down right next to the Dubai building.

post the last 3 frames where the huge gaping hole is visible

it was. one story bandied about was that the crash of the tower near it damaged the backside of it (the side you can't see) so they did a controlled demolition.
There is so much bullshit muddying the waters on this I really can't tell you for sure, but we got close up webms showing a series of rapid detonations blowing up several windows in a pattern before the entire thing collapsed, so it definitely WAS collapsed on purpose.

Wouldnt the concussive forces have been travelling outward and not downward?

shills don't want you to see this video
>9/11 Violates Laws of Physics
youtube.com/watch?v=RNKnL_j6epo

Neighboring buildings falling downward do not cause other structures to fall downward along with them

lol good thing they did a controlled demo or else it could have been a real tragedy!

that rock was covered with dirt, that why you see dirt, not debris, being shoveled. this was in construction to lay the foundations of the new structures, not the clean up.

was that what happened? I have seen pictures of the damage to the back, and I can easily believe the foundation getting cracked, but the central pillar?
Doable depending on the design and how shit hit the outside. I can see something hitting a central beam radiating out from that pillar driving force directly into the central support.

But man how lucky was Larry Silverstein for insuring that building, huh?

Well why the fuck did nobody investigate this?

This Rare photo was taken from the CNN news helicopter at the time of the attack but has been scrubbed from the internet.

The used 3D hologram technology to hide the attack and project airplanes as a distraction.

Attached: JUICE.png (700x700, 912.13K)

if anyone believed this, they deserved to be 911'd

Shows how dependent the WTCS were dependent on the exterior skeleton of the building to remain upright, something that plane impacts and fires would jeopardize.

>WTF?! THAT BUILDING LOOKS LIKE IT WAS BLOWN UP DEMOLITION STYLE? WHY IS NOBODY TALKING ABOUT THIS?
Welcome to the blackpill, zoomer.

Attached: 66C0C529-6379-4BA9-ACEE-6FF77BC4738C.gif (480x270, 2.98M)

Oy vey!

Pretty sure they used to say something like "stiffy"

the problem aint with that. not entirely.
People dug in a bit and found that those exact floors were visited and worked on by some Israelis for some "art project" involving the lighting. I believe those people, (was definitely israelis) were caught with some odd shit in their van that didn't match their story of what they were doing, but let go anyways.

As I mentioned before, there is a shit ton of muddying the waters regarding this shit.

looks like they're building a zoo

Oh I do, that is such a beautiful picture, what a marvel of architecture!
You lack any understanding of construction methods if you think this picture reveals anything controversial or debunks some "conspiratorial" claim.

Can I get a whitepill chaser for this?

Attached: jews did 911.jpg (640x405, 45.69K)

>you can see through a building made of glass when it is empty of furniture becuase its still under construction

Shamelessly low IQ

So two 100+ story buildings collapsing next to a small building wouldn’t affect that building’s foundations whatsoever?

The absolute state of American buildings. Made out of sand like in China.

>"I've the most peculiar errection at the moment. Is there a point to your stiffy?"

Because of swamp gas.

Attached: 1581981883208.webm (1280x720, 2.95M)

Attached: 4plebs.png (800x800, 998.83K)

Worst edit I’ve ever seen

How long does a controlled demolition take to set up?

So why didn't NIST use this excuse?

Fuck off milk bags.

supposedly that debris falling down damaged the back of the building. It definitely WAS hit enough to do some exterior damage, that much I am sure of, but whether it was enough to justify the controlled demolition, (a rapidly set up one at that) which is the only story that makes fucking sense, is unknown to me.

Either way we got more than enough fucking evidence to show there was a massive coverup and fuckload of bullshitting going on.
I would LOVE to get to the truth, but I will settle for merely being able to redpill people to not trust the official story, the government, etc.

If you were really going to hit the pentagon why wouldn't you dive bomb? all the videos just seem stupid and it was a missle.

>foundations
So now youre claiming it is not concussive forces and instead it was seismic forces that disturbed the foundation?

Mostly empty buildings not bringing in enough revenue?